Issue

Vol. 30 No. 2 (2018): Vol 30 Issue 2

Copyright (c) 2018 AJC

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Computational Study on Optoelectronic Property Tuning of Oligothiophenes via Chemical Modifications for Solar Cell Applications

https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2018.20948
Francisco C. Franco
Chemistry Department and Computational Materials Design Research Unit, Center for Natural Sciences and Ecological Research, De La Salle University, 2401 Taft Avenue, 0922 Manila, Philippines

Corresponding Author(s) : Francisco C. Franco

francisco.franco@dlsu.edu.ph

Asian Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 30 No. 2 (2018): Vol 30 Issue 2

Abstract

Chemical modifications in conjugated polymers offers the possibility of tuning its optoelectronic properties for various applications. In this report, the optoelectronic properties of chemically modified oligomers based on poly(3-hexylthiophene-2,5-diyl) (P3HT) were investigated via DFT and TDDFT. The study was carried out by replacing the hydrogen in the 3’-position of the bithiophene monomer unit with several substituents. The polymer properties were predicted via oligomer approach where n, was varied from 1 to 10. Various electronic and optical properties were calculated: EHOMO, ELUMO, EGap, first singlet excitation energy (EOpt) and exciton binding energy (EB). Several substituents: -CN and -F were observed to have significantly lower EHOMO/ELUMO values while having similar EGap compared to P3HT. Relevant solar cell characteristics were predicted and show that P3HT-CN and P3HT-F have significantly improved open-circuit voltage (VOC). The results suggest that P3HT-CN and P3HT-F may have overall better solar cell characteristics than P3HT.

Keywords

Density functional theory Organic solar cells Conjugated polymers Computational chemistry Optoelectronic properties
Franco, F. C. (2017). Computational Study on Optoelectronic Property Tuning of Oligothiophenes via Chemical Modifications for Solar Cell Applications. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 30(2), 329–332. https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2018.20948
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. R. Roesch, K.R. Eberhardt, S. Engmann, G. Gobsch and H. Hoppe, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, 117, 59 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2013.05.013.
  2. E. Zhou, K. Hashimoto and K. Tajima, Polymer, 54, 6501 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2013.09.058.
  3. T. Ameri, P. Khoram, J. Min and C.J. Brabec, Adv. Mater., 25, 4245 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201300623.
  4. A. Blakers, N. Zin, K. McIntosh and K. Fong, Energy Procedia, 33, 1 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.05.033.
  5. P.J. Cousins, D.D. Smith, H.C. Luan, J. Manning, T.D. Dennis, A. Waldhauer, K.E. Wilson, G. Harley and W.P. Mulligan, Proceedings of 33rd IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, p. 275 (2010).
  6. H. Heliated Gmb, Heliatek Sets New Organic Photovoltaic World Record Efficiency of 13.2, (http://www.heliatek.com/en/press/pressreleases/details/heliated-sets-new-organic-photovoltaic-world-recordefficiency-of-13-2).
  7. J. Zhao, Y. Li, G. Yang, K. Jiang, H. Lin, H. Ade, W. Ma and H. Yan, Nat. Energy, 1, 15027 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2015.27.
  8. W.S. Yang, J.H. Noh, N.J. Jeon, Y.C. Kim, S. Ryu, J. Seo and S.I. Seok, Science, 348, 1234 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa9272.
  9. J. You, Z. Hong, Y. Yang, Q. Chen, M. Cai, T.B. Song, C.C. Chen, S. Lu, Y. Liu, H. Zhou and Y. Yang, ACS Nano, 8, 1674 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1021/nn406020d.
  10. T.P. Kaloni, M. Upadhyay Kahaly, R. Faccio and U. Schwingenschlogl, Carbon, 64, 281 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2013.07.062.
  11. Y.C. Cheng, T.P. Kaloni, Z.Y. Zhu and U. Schwingenschlogl, Appl. Phys. Lett., 101, 73110 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4746261.
  12. Q. Zhang, B. Kan, F. Liu, G. Long, X. Wan, X. Chen, Y. Zuo, W. Ni, H. Zhang, M. Li, Z. Hu, F. Huang, Y. Cao, Z. Liang, M. Zhang, T.P. Russell and Y. Chen, Nat. Photonics, 9, 35 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2014.269.
  13. F. Franco Jr. and A.A. Padama, Polymer, 97, 55 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2016.05.025.
  14. E.F. Oliveira and F.C. Lavarda, Mater. Chem. Phys., 148, 923 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2014.09.002.
  15. H. Ullah, A.-H.A. Shah, S. Bilal and K. Ayub, J. Phys. Chem. C, 118, 17819 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1021/jp505626d.
  16. H. Sahu and A. Panda, Macromolecules, 46, 844 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1021/ma3024409.
  17. L. Zhang, K. Pei, M. Yu, Y. Huang, H. Zhao, M. Zeng, Y. Wang and J. Gao, J. Phys. Chem. C, 116, 26154 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1021/jp306656c.
  18. M. Qiu, R.G. Brandt, Y. Niu, X. Bao, D. Yu, N. Wang, L. Han, L. Yu, S. Xia and R. Yang, J. Phys. Chem. C, 119, 8501 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b01071.
  19. R.A. Street, S.A. Hawks, P.P. Khlyabich, G. Li, B.J. Schwartz, B.C. Thompson and Y. Yang, J. Phys. Chem. C, 118, 21873 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1021/jp507097h.
  20. A. Dkhissi, Synth. Met., 161, 1441 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.synthmet.2011.04.003.
  21. M.C. Scharber, D. Muhlbacher, M. Koppe, P. Denk, C. Waldauf, A.J. Heeger and C.J. Brabec, Adv. Mater., 18, 789 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200501717.
  22. G.R. Hutchison, M.A. Ratner and T.J. Marks, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 127, 2339 (2005); https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0461421.
  23. L. Pandey, C. Risko, J.E. Norton and J.L. Bredas, Macromolecules, 45, 6405 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1021/ma301164e.
  24. M. Moral, A. Garzon, G. Garcia, J.M. Granadino-Roldan and M. Fernandez-Gomez, J. Phys. Chem. C, 119, 4588 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1021/jp5120948.
  25. J. Wojtkiewicz, A. Iwan, M. Pilch, B. Boharewicz, K. Wójcik, I. Tazbir and M. Kaminska, Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc., 181, 208 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2017.03.046.
  26. X.-H. Xie, W. Shen, R.-X. He and M. Li, Bull. Korean Chem. Soc., 34, 2995 (2013); https://doi.org/10.5012/bkcs.2013.34.10.2995.
  27. F. Franco Jr., Mol. Simul., 43, 222 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1080/08927022.2016.1250267.
  28. J.J.P. Stewart, MOPAC2016, Computational Chemistry, Colorado Springs, CO, USA (2016).
  29. A.A. Granovsky, GAMESS/Firefly version 8.1 (2013); http://classic.chem.msu.su/gran/gamess/index.html.
  30. M.W. Schmidt, K.K. Baldridge, J.A. Boatz, S.T. Elbert, M.S. Gordon, J.H. Jensen, S. Koseki, N. Matsunaga, K.A. Nguyen, S. Su, T.L. Windus, M. Dupuis and J.A. Montgomery, J. Comput. Chem., 14, 1347 (1993); https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.540141112.
  31. J. Luo, Z.Q. Xue, W.M. Liu, J.L. Wu and Z.Q. Yang, J. Phys. Chem. A, 110, 12005 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1021/jp063669m.
  32. J.M. Toussaint and J.L. Bredas, Synth. Met., 61, 103 (1993); https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-6779(93)91205-G.
  33. F. Wu, L. Chen, H. Wang and Y. Chen, J. Phys. Chem. C, 117, 9581 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1021/jp401552f.
  34. T.M. Pappenfus, J.A. Schmidt, R.E. Koehn and J.D. Alia, Macromolecules, 44, 2354 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1021/ma1026498.
  35. J. Roncali, Macromol. Rapid Commun., 28, 1761 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.200700345.
  36. F.A. Carey and R.J. Sundberg, Advanced Organic Chemistry: Part A: Structure and Mechanisms, Springer, New York, edn 5, p. 339 (2007).
  37. F. Franco Jr. and A.A. Padama, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn., 86, 064802 (2017); https://doi.org/10.7566/JPSJ.86.064802.
  38. M. Reyes-Reyes, K. Kim and D.L. Carroll, Appl. Phys. Lett., 87, 83506 (2005); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2006986.
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0