Issue

Vol. 25 No. 7 (2013): Vol 25 Issue 7

Copyright (c) 2013 AJC

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Molecularly Imprinted Membrane Possessing Selectivity and Adsorption Behaviour to Targeted (-)-Epigallocatechin-3-gallate Molecule

https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2013.13727
Haihui Zhang
School of Food and Biological Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, P.R. China
Yu Qin
School of Food and Biological Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, P.R. China
Yuqing Duan
School of Food and Biological Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, P.R. China
Feifei Xu
School of Food and Biological Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, P.R. China
Can Zhang
School of Food and Biological Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, P.R. China
Yongsheng Yan
School of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, P.R. China
Haile Ma
School of Food and Biological Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, P.R. China
Yanhong Wang
School of Food and Biological Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, P.R. China

Corresponding Author(s) : Yuqing Duan

dyq101@ujs.edu.cn

Asian Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 25 No. 7 (2013): Vol 25 Issue 7

Abstract

An efficient molecular imprinted membrane (MIM) was prepared and successfully used for selective absorbing (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) from the solution of tea. The MIM obtained was characterized by FT-IR and scanning electron microscopy. Kinetics, binding and selectivity experiment were used to study the adsorption properties of MIM in EGCG solution. The results showed that the template molecule had been incorporated into the support membrane by physical measure, the kinetics of MIM followed the pseudo-second-order kinetic model and the process of equilibrium adsorption could be simulated by Langmuir model. Molecular imprinted membrane exhibited better selectivity for EGCG from the extract of tea polyphenol than non-molecularly imprinted membrane (NIM) and the relative selectivity coefficients of MIM for EGCG/(-)-epigallocatechin, EGCG/(+)-catechin, EGCG/(-)-gallocatechin gallate and EGCG/(-)-epicatechin-3-gallate were 3.22, 1.34, 1.33 and 1.59, respectively. These findings indicated that the MIM had a good selectivity and could be used to separate EGCG from the real sample.

Keywords

Molecularly imprinted membrane (-)-Epigallocatechin-3-gallate Selectivity Separation
Zhang, H., Qin, Y., Duan, Y., Xu, F., Zhang, C., Yan, Y., … Wang, Y. (2013). Molecularly Imprinted Membrane Possessing Selectivity and Adsorption Behaviour to Targeted (-)-Epigallocatechin-3-gallate Molecule. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 25(7), 3711–3718. https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2013.13727
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. S. Bettuzzi, M. Brausi, F. Rizzi, G. Castagnetti, G. Peracchia and A. Corti, Cancer Res., 66, 1234 (2006).
  2. S.A. Wiseman, D.A. Balentine and B. Frei, Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr., 37, 693 (1997).
  3. N. Salah, N.J. Miller, G. Paganga, L. Tijburg, G.P. Bolwell, C. Rice-Evans, Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 322, 339 (1995).
  4. I.E. Dreosti, Nutr. Rev., 54, S51 (1996).
  5. Y. Kuroda and Y. Hara, Mutat. Res., 436, 69 (1999).
  6. H. Nakane and K. Ono, Biochemistry, 286, 83 (1991).
  7. S. Sakanaka, N. Shimura, M. Aizawa, M. Kim and T. Yamamoto, Biochemistry, 56, 592 (1992).
  8. L.B.M. Tijburg, T. Mattern, J.D. Folts, U.M. Weisgerber and M.B. Katan, Food Sci. Nutr., 37, 771 (1997).
  9. F. Hashimoto, G. I. Nonaka and I. Nishiki, Chem. Pharm. Bull., 37, 77 (1989).
  10. L. Yao, Y. Jiang, N. Datta, R. Singanusong, X. Liu, J. Duan, K. Raymont, A. Lisle and Y. Xu, Food Chem., 84, 253 (2004).
  11. T.Y. Guo, Y.Q. Xia, J. Wang, M.D. Song and B.H. Zhang, Biomaterials, 26, 5737 (2005).
  12. D. Kriz and K. Mosbach, Anal. Chim. Acta, 300, 71 (1995).
  13. A.G. Mayes and K. Mosbach, Trends Anal. Chem., 16, 321 (1997).
  14. P.K. Owens, L. Karlsson, E.S.M. Lutz, L.I. Andersson, Trends Anal. Chem., 18, 146 (1999).
  15. G. Vlatakis, L.I. Andersson, R. Muller, K. Mosbach, Nature, 361, 645 (1993).
  16. T.A. Sergeyeva, S.A. Piletsky, A.A. Brovko, L.A. Slinchenko, L.M. Sergeeva, T.L. Panasyuk and A.V. El'skaya, Analyst, 124, 331 (1999).
  17. M.C. Hennion, J. Chromatogr. A, 856, 3 (1999).
  18. M. Komiyama, T. Takeuchi, T. Mukawa and H. Asanuma, Molecular Imprinting, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA (2003).
  19. M.N. Han, R. Kane, M. Goto and G. Belfort, Macromolecules, 36, 4472 (2003).
  20. X.L. Zhu, Q.D. Su, J.B. Cai, J. Yang and Y. Gao, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 101, 4468 (2006).
  21. R. Kielczynski and M. Bryjak, Sep. Purif. Technol., 41, 231 (2005).
  22. S.H. Son and J. Jegal, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 104, 1866 (2007).
  23. C. Cristallini, G. Ciardelli, N. Barbani and P. Giusti, Macromal. Biosci., 4, 31 (2004).
  24. F. Liu, C.H. Du, B.K. Zhu and Y.Y. Xu, Polymer, 48, 2910 (2007).
  25. N.C. Bing, Z.L. Xu, X.J. Wang, Z.G. Yang and H. Yang, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 106, 71 (2007).
  26. E. Birlik, A. Ersöz, E. Açíkkalp, A. Denizli and R. Say, J. Hazard Mater., 140, 110 (2007).
  27. J.M. Wang, C.P. Huang, H.E. Allen, L.R. Takiyama, I. Poesponegoro, H. Poesponegoro and D. Pirestani, Water Environ. Res., 70, 1041 (1998).
  28. H. Wu, Y.Y. Zhao, M.C. Nie and Z.Y. Jiang, Sep. Purif. Technol., 68, 97 (2009).
  29. W.S.W. Ngah, C.S. Endud and R. Mayanar, React. Funct. Polym., 50, 181 (2002).
  30. P.P. Xu, W.Z. Xu, X.J. Zhang and Y.S. Yan, Microchim. Acta, 171, 441 (2010).
  31. P. Li, Y.H. Wang, R.Y. Ma and X.L. Zhang, J. Food Eng., 67, 253 (2005)
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 2 Download : 0