Issue

Vol. 25 No. 7 (2013): Vol 25 Issue 7

Copyright (c) 2013 AJC

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Comparison of Crystal Structure Between Carbonated Hydroxyapatite and Natural Bone Apatite with Theoretical Calculation

https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2013.13709
W.H. Yang
College of Bioengineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing, P.R. China ; Key Laboratory of Biorheological Science and Technology for Ministry of Education, Chongqing University, Chongqing, P.R. China
X.F. Xi
College of Bioengineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing, P.R. China ; Key Laboratory of Biorheological Science and Technology for Ministry of Education, Chongqing University, Chongqing, P.R. China
J.F. Li
College of Bioengineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing, P.R. China ; Key Laboratory of Biorheological Science and Technology for Ministry of Education, Chongqing University, Chongqing, P.R. China
K.Y. Cai
College of Bioengineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing, P.R. China ; Key Laboratory of Biorheological Science and Technology for Ministry of Education, Chongqing University, Chongqing, P.R. China

Corresponding Author(s) : W.H. Yang

yangweihu@cqu.edu.cn

Asian Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 25 No. 7 (2013): Vol 25 Issue 7

Abstract

In this study, nanosized carbonated hydroxyapatite and stoichiometric hydroxyapatite were synthesized. Chemical analyses, as well as infrared spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction, were applied to investigate the composition, structure and chemical groups of all the samples. Furthermore, the structure and the crystal energy of all samples were analyzed by software and the mathematic methods. The results show that when CO32- is added into the solution after the reaction, the carbonated hydroxyapatite samples and natural bone apatite are similar in crystal structure, composition and crystallite size. Chemical analyses suggest that natural bone apatite and all synthetic carbonated hydroxyapatite samples have the same molecular formula. Meanwhile, the computed crystal energy indicates that the carbonated hydroxyapatite type-B substitution has lower crystal energy and better stability. Moreover, the fitting FTIR spectra prove that there is more type-B substitution than type-A substitution in all samples.

Keywords

Hydroxyapatite Carbonate substitution Structure simulation Energy calculation
Yang, W., Xi, X., Li, J., & Cai, K. (2013). Comparison of Crystal Structure Between Carbonated Hydroxyapatite and Natural Bone Apatite with Theoretical Calculation. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 25(7), 3673–3678. https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2013.13709
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. A. Antonakos and E. Liarokapis, Biomaterials, 28, 3043 (2007).
  2. R. Murugan, S. Ramakrishna and K.P. Rao, Mater. Lett., 60, 2844 (2006).
  3. Lan Wu, Dissertation, Sichuan University, Sichuan, China (2006).
  4. M. Wakamura, K. Kandori and T. Ishikawa, Colloid. Surf. A,164, 297 (2000).
  5. M.H. Fathi, A. Hanifi and V. Mortazavi, J. Mater. Proc. Technol., 202, 536 (2008).
  6. R. Murugan and S. Ramakrishna, Acta Biomed., 2, 201 (2006).
  7. F. Miyaji, Y. Kono and Y. Suyama, Mater. Res. Bull., 40, 209 (2005).
  8. M. Iafisco and J.G. Morales, Adv. Eng. Mater., 12, B218 (2010).
  9. I.R. Gibson and W. Bonfield, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 59, 697 (2009).
  10. S. Peroos, Z.M. Du and N.H. de Leeuw, Biomaterials, 27, 2150 (2006).
  11. K. Kawabata and T. Yamamoto, J. Ceram. Soc. (Japan), 118, 548 (2010).
  12. K. Matsunaga and H. Murata, J. Phys. Chem. B, 113, 3584 (2009).
  13. T. Ikoma and A. Yamazaki, J. Solid State Chem., 144, 272 (1999).
  14. L. Lv, L.H. Guo and Y.X. Zhang, J. Chin. Ceram. Soc., 32, 177 (2004).
  15. D.D. Heslop, Y. Bi and A.A. Baig, J. Colloids Interf. Sci., 289, 14 (2005).
  16. M.E. Fleet and Xi Liu, Biomaterials, 28, 916 (2007).
  17. M.E. Fleet and X.Y. Liu, Biomaterials, 26, 7548 (2008).
  18. M.E. Fleet and X.Y. Liu, J. Solid State Chem., 177, 3174 (2005).
  19. R.M. Wilson, S.E.P. Dowker and J.C. Elliott, Biomaterials, 27, 4682 (2006).
  20. N.Y. Mostafa and P.W. Brown, J. Phys. Chem. Solid., 68, 431 (2007).
  21. R. Astala and M.J. Stott, Chem. Mater., 17, 4125 (2005).
  22. H.R. Low, C. Ritter and T.J. White, Dalton Trans., 6488 (2010).
  23. S. Cai, Y.W. Wang and H. Lv, Ceram Int., 31, 135 (2005).
  24. L. Müller, E. Conforto and D. Caillard, Biomed. Eng., 24, 462 (2007).
  25. Q.J. He, Z.L. Huang and X.K. Cheng, Mater. Lett., 62, 539 (2008).
  26. J.C. Elliot, Calc. Tiss. Res., 3, 293 (1969).
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 1 Download : 0