Issue

Vol. 27 No. 7 (2015): Vol 27 Issue 7, 2015

Copyright (c) 2015 AJC

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Kinetics of Degradation of Bisphenol A by Ozonization in Aqueous Solution

https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2015.17904
Jiacai Hou
College of Chemistry and Material Science, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian 271018, Shandong Province, P.R. China
Yanan Ge
College of Chemistry and Material Science, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian 271018, Shandong Province, P.R. China
Yue Li
College of Chemistry and Material Science, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian 271018, Shandong Province, P.R. China
Aihua Yuan
College of Chemistry and Material Science, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian 271018, Shandong Province, P.R. China
Qinghua Zhao
College of Chemistry and Material Science, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian 271018, Shandong Province, P.R. China
Shouhua Jia
College of Chemistry and Material Science, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian 271018, Shandong Province, P.R. China

Corresponding Author(s) : Shouhua Jia

shjia@sdau.edu.cn

Asian Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 27 No. 7 (2015): Vol 27 Issue 7, 2015

Abstract

The degradation of bisphenol A in aqueous solution by ozonization was investigated at the laboratory scale. The primary factors that influenced the removal efficiency of bisphenol A were investigated, including the pH, the initial concentration of bisphenol A, the ozone gas concentration and the reaction temperature. Ozone enabled the efficient removal of bisphenol A and the maximum removal efficiency was achieved at pH 7. An accurate kinetic model of the chemical reaction and mass transfer was described by an exponential relationship between the pseudo-first-order rate constant and the operational parameters. The intrinsic kinetic constants for the reaction of bisphenol A with ozone were also determined using a competitive kinetics method with phenol as a reference compound. The results revealed that the pH exerted a strong influence on the kinetic constants and that the rate constants increased exponentially from 3.27 × 103 M-1 s-1 to 1.23 × 109 M-1 s-1 as the pH was increased from 3 to 11, respectively.

Keywords

Bisphenol A Ozonation Influencing factors Removal efficiency Kinetics model
Hou, J., Ge, Y., Li, Y., Yuan, A., Zhao, Q., & Jia, S. (2015). Kinetics of Degradation of Bisphenol A by Ozonization in Aqueous Solution. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 27(7), 2437–2444. https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2015.17904
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. T.T. Schug, A. Janesick, B. Blumberg and J.J. Heindel, J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol., 127, 204 (2011); doi:10.1016/j.jsbmb.2011.08.007.
  2. N. Benachour and A. Aris, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 241, 322 (2009); doi:10.1016/j.taap.2009.09.005.
  3. M. Sugiura-Ogasawara, Y. Ozaki, S.-i. Sonta, T. Makino and K. Suzumori, Hum. Reprod., 20, 2325 (2005); doi:10.1093/humrep/deh888.
  4. N. Olea, R. Pulgar, P. Pérez, F. Olea-Serrano, A. Rivas, A. Novillo-Fertrell, V. Pedraza, A.M. Soto and C. Sonnenschein, Environ. Health Perspect., 104, 298 (1996); doi:10.1289/ehp.96104298.
  5. C. Gupta, Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med., 224, 61 (2000); doi:10.1046/j.1525-1373.2000.22402.x.
  6. J.-H. Kang, D. Aasi and Y. Katayama, Crit. Rev. Toxicol., 37, 607 (2007); doi:10.1080/10408440701493103.
  7. V. Bindhumol, K. Chitra and P. Mathur, Toxicology, 188, 117 (2003); doi:10.1016/S0300-483X(03)00056-8.
  8. R.R. Newbold, E. Padilla-Banks, W.N. Jefferson and J.J. Heindel, Int. J. Androl., 31, 201 (2008); doi:10.1111/j.1365-2605.2007.00858.x.
  9. A. Ropero, P. Alonso-Magdalena, E. García-García, C. Ripoll, E. Fuentes and A. Nadal, Int. J. Androl., 31, 194 (2008); doi:10.1111/j.1365-2605.2007.00832.x.
  10. K. Moriyama, T. Tagami, T. Akamizu, T. Usui, M. Saijo, N. Kanamoto, Y. Hataya, A. Shimatsu, H. Kuzuya and K. Nakao, J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 87, 5185 (2002); doi:10.1210/jc.2002-020209.
  11. T. Garoma and S. Matsumoto, J. Hazard. Mater., 167, 1185 (2009); doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.01.133.
  12. C.A. Staples, P.B. Dome, G.M. Klecka, S.T. Oblock and L.R. Harris, Chemosphere, 36, 2149 (1998); doi:10.1016/S0045-6535(97)10133-3.
  13. M.F.L. Lemos, C.A.M. Gestel and A.M.V.M. Soares, J. Soils Sediments, 9, 492 (2009); doi:10.1007/s11368-009-0104-y.
  14. L.N. Vandenberg, R. Hauser, M. Marcus, N. Olea and W.V. Welshons, Reprod. Toxicol., 24, 139 (2007); doi:10.1016/j.reprotox.2007.07.010.
  15. S. Jayashree, D. Indumathi, N. Akilavalli, S. Sathish, J. Selvaraj and K. Balasubramanian, Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol., 35, 300 (2013); doi:10.1016/j.etap.2012.12.016.
  16. Z. Qiang, H. Dong, B. Zhu, J. Qu and Y. Nie, Chemosphere, 92, 986 (2013); doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.03.019.
  17. B. Gözmen, M.A. Oturan, N. Oturan and O. Erbatur, Environ. Sci. Technol., 37, 3716 (2003); doi:10.1021/es034011e.
  18. Z. Frontistis, V.M. Daskalaki, A. Katsaounis, I. Poulios and D. Mantzavinos, Water Res., 45, 2996 (2011); doi:10.1016/j.watres.2011.03.030.
  19. Z. Peng, F. Wu and N. Deng, Environ. Pollut., 144, 840 (2006); doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2006.02.006.
  20. C. Wang, H. Zhang, F. Li and L. Zhu, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 6843 (2010); doi:10.1021/es101890w.
  21. J. Zhang, B. Sun and X. Guan, Sep. Purif. Technol., 107, 48 (2013); doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2013.01.023.
  22. D. Bing-zhi, W. Lin and G. Nai-yun, Desalination, 221, 312 (2008); doi:10.1016/j.desal.2007.01.088.
  23. G. Xiao, L. Fu and A. Li, Chem. Eng. J., 191, 171 (2012); doi:10.1016/j.cej.2012.02.092.
  24. M. Deborde, S. Rabouan, P. Mazellier, J.-P. Duguet and B. Legube, Water Res., 42, 4299 (2008); doi:10.1016/j.watres.2008.07.015.
  25. T. Garoma, S. Matsumoto, Y. Wu and R. Klinger, Ozone Sci. Eng., 32, 338 (2010); doi:10.1080/01919512.2010.508484.
  26. M. Deborde, S. Rabouan, J.-P. Duguet and B. Legube, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 6086 (2005); doi:10.1021/es0501619.
  27. J. Lee, H. Park and J. Yoon, Environ. Technol., 24, 241 (2003); doi:10.1080/09593330309385555.
  28. A. Alvares, C. Diaper and S. Parsons, Environ. Technol., 22, 409 (2001); doi:10.1080/09593332208618273.
  29. K.S. Tay, N.A. Rahman and M.R.B. Abas, Maejo Int. J. Sci. Technol., 6, 77 (2012).
  30. I. Arslan-Alaton and A.E. Caglayan, Chemosphere, 59, 31 (2005); doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.10.014.
  31. R. Keykavoos, R. Mankidy, H. Ma, P. Jones and J. Soltan, Sep. Purif. Technol., 107, 310 (2013); doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2013.01.050.
  32. F. Wang, Y. Wang and M. Ji, J. Hazard. Mater., 123, 145 (2005); doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.03.033.
  33. C.-H. Ko, C.-Y. Guan, P.-J. Lu and J.-M. Chern, Chem. Eng. J., 171, 1045 (2011); doi:10.1016/j.cej.2011.04.059.
  34. J. Hoigné and H. Bader, Water Res., 17, 173 (1983); doi:10.1016/0043-1354(83)90098-2.
  35. R. Broséus, S. Vincent, K. Aboulfadl, A. Daneshvar, S. Sauvé, B. Barbeau and M. Prévost, Water Res., 43, 4707 (2009); doi:10.1016/j.watres.2009.07.031.
  36. J. Staehelin and J. Hoigne, Environ. Sci. Technol., 19, 1206 (1985); doi:10.1021/es00142a012.
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 1 Download : 0