Issue

Vol. 38 No. 9 (2026): Vol 38 Issue 9 Year 2026

Copyright (c) 2026 Nikita Satish Gupta Gupta

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Comparative Photocatalytic Degradation of Alizarin Red S Dye using Cobalt-Doped TiO2 under UV, Visible and Solar Light Irradiation

https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2026.36471
Nikita S. Gupta
Department of Chemistry, Lady Amritbai Daga College & Smt. Ratnidevi Purohit College, Nagpur-440010, India; Department of Chemistry, Rashtrasant Tukadoji Maharaj Nagpur University, Nagpur-440033, India
https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2085-5608
Susmita A. Mandavgane
Department of Chemistry, DRB Sindhu Mahavidyalaya, Nagpur-440017, India
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5982-1810

Corresponding Author(s) : Nikita S. Gupta

nikitag7496@gmail.com

Asian Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 38 No. 9 (2026): Vol 38 Issue 9 Year 2026

Abstract

Titanium dioxide (TiO2) is a widely studied photocatalyst, although its broad band gap restricts its response mainly to the ultraviolet region. This study investigates the effect of cobalt doping on the optical properties and photocatalytic activity of TiO2 under ultraviolet (UV), visible and solar irradiation. Co-doped TiO2 containing 0.5 mol% Co was synthesized by the sol–gel method. The crystal structure, morphology, particle size and elemental composition were examined by X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), selected-area electron diffraction (SAED) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). Optical absorption characteristics were evaluated by UV-visible diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) and the band gap energy was estimated from Tauc plots. The photocatalytic activity of the materials was evaluated using Alizarin dye as a model pollutant under UV, visible and solar irradiation, with the degradation kinetics analyzed using a pseudo-first-order model. XRD analysis confirmed the formation of highly crystalline, single-phase anatase TiO2. TEM images revealed nearly spherical nanoparticles with particle sizes of approximately 30-40 nm, while SAED patterns were consistent with the crystalline anatase structure. EDX analysis confirmed the presence of Co and TiO2 constituents without detectable extraneous elements. Co doping reduced the optical band gap from 3.2 eV for pristine TiO2 to 2.0 eV for Co-doped TiO2, extending the light absorption toward the visible region. After 60 min of irradiation, Alizarin red S (ARS) degradation reached 73.53%, 48.44% and 63.46% under UV, visible and solar light, respectively, with corresponding pseudo-first-order rate constants of 0.01819, 0.01073 and 0.01608 min–1. The reduced band gap and enhanced reaction kinetics under visible and solar irradiation establish Co-doped TiO2 as an effective photocatalyst for light-assisted wastewater treatment.

Keywords

Alizarin dye Degradation Band gap reduction Doped TiO2 Photocatalysis Sol gel synthesis UV–Vis DRS
(1)
Gupta, N. S.; Mandavgane, S. A. Comparative Photocatalytic Degradation of Alizarin Red S Dye Using Cobalt-Doped TiO2 under UV, Visible and Solar Light Irradiation. ajc 2026, 38, 2314-2322.
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. S. Dutta, S. Adhikary, S. Bhattacharya, S. Chatterjee, A. Chakraborty, D. Roy, D. Banerjee, A. Ganguly, S. Nanda and P. Rajak, J. Environ. Manage., 353, 120103 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120103
  2. D. Jiang, T.A. Otitoju, Y. Ouyang, N.F. Shoparwe, S. Wang, A. Zhang and S. Li, Catalysts, 11, 1039 (2021); https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11091039
  3. R. Daghrir, P. Drogui and D. Robert, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 52, 3581 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1021/ie303468t
  4. P. Srivastava, S.A. Al-Obaidi, G. Webster, A.J. Weightman and D.J. Sapsford, J. Environ. Manage., 317, 115332 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115332
  5. T. Del Giacco, R. Germani, F. Saracino and M. Stradiotto, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem., 332, 546 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2016.10.002
  6. P. Jiang, W. Xiang, J. Kuang, W. Liu and W. Cao, Solid State Sci., 46, 27 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2015.05.007
  7. U. Jabeen, S.M. Shah and S.U. Khan, Surf. Interfaces, 6, 40 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2016.11.002
  8. N. Klueb-arb, S. Chuangchote, K. Roongraung, N. Laosiripojana and T. Sagawa, J. Sustain. Energy Environ., 9, 11 (2018); 9. A. Ajmal, I. Majeed, R.N. Malik, H. Idriss and M.A. Nadeem, RSC Adv., 4, 37003 (2014);
  9. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA06658H
  10. M.C. Collivignarelli, A. Abbà, M. Carnevale Miino and S. Damiani, J. Environ. Manage., 236, 727 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.094
  11. M.D. Khan, A. Singh, M.Z. Khan, S. Tabraiz and J. Sheikh, J. Water Process Eng., 53, 103579 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.103579
  12. D. Chen, Y. Cheng, N. Zhou, P. Chen, Y. Wang, K. Li, S. Huo, P. Cheng, P. Peng, R. Zhang, L. Wang, H. Liu, Y. Liu and R. Ruan, J. Clean. Prod., 268, 121725 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121725
  13. Y. Shi, J. Chen, S. Xiao, Y. Zhang and X. Zhou, ACS ES&T Water, 3, 3449 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestwater.3c00523
  14. S.J. Armaković, M.M. Savanović and S. Armaković, Catalysts, 13, 26 (2023); https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13010026
  15. Y. Nosaka and A.Y. Nosaka, Chem. Rev., 117, 11302 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00161
  16. R. Acharya and P. Pani, Mater. Today: Proc., 67, 1276 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.09.037
  17. B. Roose, S. Pathak and U. Steiner, Chem. Soc. Rev., 44, 8326 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CS00352K
  18. B. Choudhury and A. Choudhury, J. Luminescence, 132, 178 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlumin.2011.08.020
  19. A. Safeen, K. Safeen, Zulfqar, W.H. Shah, Q. Zaman, K. Althubeiti, R. Ullah, S. Al Otaibi, N. Rahman, S. Iqbal, A. Khan, A. Khan and R. Khan, RSC Adv., 12, 15767 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1039/D2RA01948
  20. R. Noonuruk and C. Wattanawikkam, Curr. Appl. Sci. Technol., 20, 43 (2020).
  21. N. Thakur, N. Thakur, K. Kumar and A. Kumar, Mater. Today: Proc., (2023); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.01.253
  22. P.W. Koh, L. Yuliati and S.L. Lee, Malaysian J. Fundament. Appl. Sci., 11, 126 (2015); https://doi.org/10.11113/mjfas.v11n3.382
  23. M.M. Ahmad, S. Mushtaq, H.S. Al Qahtani, A. Sedky and M.W. Alam, Crystals, 11, 1456 (2021); https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11121456
  24. P. Pardhi, K.L. Patle, K.S. Morla, J.D. Ekhe and A. Banerjee, Energy Fuels, 40, 7458 (2026); https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c06238
  25. K. Safeen, R. Ullah, A. Safeen, Zulfiqar, M. Kabeer, R. Khan, H. Ullah, A. Zaman, K. Shafique Ahmad, M.Z. Ullah Shah, H.O. Elansary, I. Mohamed Moussa, R. Casini and E.A. Mahmoud, J. Saudi Chem. Soc., 27, 101711 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscs.2023.101711
  26. S. Akel, R. Boughaled, R. Dillert, M. El Azzouzi and D.W. Bahnemann, Molecules, 25, 249 (2020); https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25020249
  27. C. Byrne, L. Moran, D. Hermosilla, N. Merayo, Á. Blanco, S. Rhatigan, S. Hinder, P. Ganguly, M. Nolan and S.C. Pillai, Appl. Catal. B, 246, 266 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.01.058
  28. Y. Wang, R. Zhang, J. Li, L. Li and S. Lin, Nanoscale Res. Lett., 9, 46 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1186/1556-276X-9-46
  29. T. Umebayashi, T. Yamaki, H. Itoh and K. Asai, J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 63, no. 10, pp. 1909 (2002); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3697(02)00177-4
  30. M. Saini, M. Kumar and T. Som, Appl. Surf. Sci., 418, 302 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.01.262
  31. A. Hussain, A. Rauf, E. Ahmed, M. S. Khan, S. A. Mian and J. Jang, Molecules, 28, 3252 (2023); https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28073252
  32. S. Sood, S.K. Mehta, A. Umar and S.K. Kansal, New J. Chem., 38, 3127 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1039/C4NJ00179F
  33. A. Gul, J. Sun, R. Ullah, T. Munir and S. Bai, ChemistrySelect, 6, 6816 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.202100813
  34. J. Zhu, W. Zheng, B. He, J. Zhang and M. Anpo, J. Mol. Catal. Chem., 216, 35 (2004); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcata.2004.01.008
  35. T. Tong, J. Zhang, B. Tian, F. Chen and D. He, J. Hazard. Mater., 155, 572 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.11.106
  36. M. Huang, C. Xu, Z. Wu, Y. Huang, J. Lin and J. Wu, Dyes Pigments, 77, 327 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2007.01.026
  37. M. Hamadanian, A. Reisi-Vanani and A. Majedi, Appl. Surf. Sci., 256, 1837 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.10.016
  38. S. Sakthivel, M.V. Shankar, M. Palanichamy, B. Arabindoo, D.W. Bahnemann and V. Murugesan, Water Res., 38, 3001 (2004); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2004.04.046
  39. Y. Yu, H. Ming, D. He, J. Li, Y. Jin, H. Sun, M. Ahmad and X. Wang, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 11, 111243 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2023.111243
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 1 Download : 0
PlumX