Copyright (c) 2026 Sweta D. Patel, Hiren R. Chaudhary, Shital Dhiren Faldu, Ujashkumar A. Shah, Sohilkhan Dolatkhan Chauhan, Ishvarchandra Parmar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Indazole Ring Containing Diaryl Urea Derivatives Inducing Activities in Human Breast Cancer MCF-7 Cells
Corresponding Author(s) : Sweta D. Patel
Asian Journal of Chemistry,
Vol. 38 No. 5 (2026): Vol 38, Issue 5, 2026
Abstract
In this study, a series of twelve novel indazole-diaryl urea hybrids (R1-R12) was designed, synthesised and structurally characterised with the aim of developing new breast cancer therapeutics. The synthetic strategy employed a multistep route starting from 5-bromo-1H-indazole and afforded the desired derivatives in good yields. The chemical structures of all final products were confirmed using 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy, FTIR and mass spectrometry, ensuring high purity and structural integrity. In vitro cytotoxic activity was assessed against the MCF-7 human breast cancer cell line using the MTT assay. Among the synthesised molecules, compounds R7, R8 and R11 emerged as the most active, with IC50 values of 13.15, 12.71 and 11.48 µM, respectively. Notably, these values represent a significant improvement compared to the reference drug sorafenib (IC50 = 29.3 µM). Structure–activity relationship (SAR) analysis suggested that electron-withdrawing substituents such as fluorine and chlorine, as well as di-substituted aromatic rings, enhanced cytotoxic potency. Molecular docking studies were performed on the histone deacetylase crystal structure (HDAC, PDB ID: 4LXZ) to provide structural insights into binding affinity. The most potent compounds displayed favourable docking scores (R7 = -10.1 kcal/mol and R11 = -9.5 kcal/mol) and established key hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interactions with active site residues, validating the experimental data. In addition, in silico ADME profiling using SwissADME demonstrated compliance with Lipinski’s rule of five, favourable log P values and suitable topological polar surface area (TPSA), indicating good oral bioavailability and drug-likeness. Taken together, these results demonstrate that indazole-diaryl urea hybrids, particularly compounds R7, R8 and R11, possess significant cytotoxic potential against breast cancer cells and outperform sorafenib in vitro. The combined experimental and computational data highlight these compounds as promising lead scaffolds for further optimisation and development of next-generation anticancer therapeutics.
Keywords
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)BibTeX
- S.A. Ahmed, A.S. Chopde, A.B. Yamnaji and N.S. Pinjari, J. Pharma Insights Res., 3, 394 (2025); https://doi.org/10.69613/yj37ha36
- I. Pibiri, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 25, 9503 (2024); https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25179503
- T. Gallavardin and X. Franck, Org. Biomol. Chem., 24, 767 (2026); https://doi.org/10.1039/D5OB01732G
- S. Kheirkhahnia, M. Khodi, P. Ahmadfila, S. Ziaei and M. Pordel, Inorg. Chem. Commun., 182, 115460 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2025.115460
- J. Dong, Q. Zhang, Z. Wang, G. Huang and S. Li, ChemMedChem, 13, 1490 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1002/cmdc.201800253
- X. Mo, D.P. Rao, K. Kaur, R. Hassan, A.S. Abdel-Samea, S.M. Farhan, S. Bräse and H. Hashem, Molecules, 29, 4770 (2024); https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29194770
- R. Nath, S. Ashique, B. Nehra, I. Debnath, S. Ghosh, P.A. Chawla, F. M. Al-Salem, S. Yasmin, M.S. Hussain, A. Chakraborty, A. Chakraborty, L. Das, S.B. Sridhar, J. Das, B. Debnath and M.Y. Ansari, Mol Divers., (2026); https://doi.org/10.1007/s11030-026-11499-1
- A. Catalano, D. Iacopetta, M. S. Sinicropi and C. Franchini, Appl. Sci., 11, 374 (2021); https://doi.org/10.3390/app11010374
- S. Sadeghian-Rizi, G.A. Khodarahmi, A. Sakhteman, A. Jahanian-Najafabadi, M. Rostami, M. Mirzaei and F. Hassanzadeh, Res. Pharm. Sci., 12, 500 (2017); https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-5362.217430
- D. Chen, M. Zhao, W. Tan, Y. Li, X. Li, Y. Li and X. Fan, Eur. J. Pharm. Sci., 130, 100 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2019.01.020
- C.E. DeSantis, M. Ma, M.M. Gaudet, L.A. Newman, K.D. Miller, A. Goding Sauer, R.L. Siegel and A. Jemal, CA: Cancer J. Clin., 69, 438 (2019); https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21583
- H. Sung, J. Ferlay, R.L. Siegel, M. Laversanne, I. Soerjomataram, A. Jemal and F. Bray, CA: Cancer J. Clin., 71, 209 (2021); https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660
- C.-R. Zhao, R.-Q. Wang, G. Li, X.-X. Xue, C.-J. Sun, X.-J. Qu and W.-B. Li, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 23, 1989 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2013.02.034
- X. Zhai, Q. Huang, N. Jiang, D. Wu, H. Zhou and P. Gong, Molecules, 18, 2904 (2013); https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules18032904
- M. Priyadarshini and N.A.N. Raj, Photodiagnosis Photodynam. Ther., 50, 104411 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2024.104411
- A. Janem, G. Omar, O. Hamed, S. Jodeh, A. Deghles, A. Berisha, W. Mansour, S.A. Jabal, O. Fares, A. Jaser, A. Amireh and G. Adwan, Heliyon, 10, e33808 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33808
- F.O.A. Frejat, H. Zhai, Y. Cao, L. Wang, Y.A. Mostafa, H.A.M. Gomaa, B.G.M. Youssif and C. Wu, Bioorg. Chem., 126, 105922 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2022.105922
References
S.A. Ahmed, A.S. Chopde, A.B. Yamnaji and N.S. Pinjari, J. Pharma Insights Res., 3, 394 (2025); https://doi.org/10.69613/yj37ha36
I. Pibiri, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 25, 9503 (2024); https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25179503
T. Gallavardin and X. Franck, Org. Biomol. Chem., 24, 767 (2026); https://doi.org/10.1039/D5OB01732G
S. Kheirkhahnia, M. Khodi, P. Ahmadfila, S. Ziaei and M. Pordel, Inorg. Chem. Commun., 182, 115460 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2025.115460
J. Dong, Q. Zhang, Z. Wang, G. Huang and S. Li, ChemMedChem, 13, 1490 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1002/cmdc.201800253
X. Mo, D.P. Rao, K. Kaur, R. Hassan, A.S. Abdel-Samea, S.M. Farhan, S. Bräse and H. Hashem, Molecules, 29, 4770 (2024); https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29194770
R. Nath, S. Ashique, B. Nehra, I. Debnath, S. Ghosh, P.A. Chawla, F. M. Al-Salem, S. Yasmin, M.S. Hussain, A. Chakraborty, A. Chakraborty, L. Das, S.B. Sridhar, J. Das, B. Debnath and M.Y. Ansari, Mol Divers., (2026); https://doi.org/10.1007/s11030-026-11499-1
A. Catalano, D. Iacopetta, M. S. Sinicropi and C. Franchini, Appl. Sci., 11, 374 (2021); https://doi.org/10.3390/app11010374
S. Sadeghian-Rizi, G.A. Khodarahmi, A. Sakhteman, A. Jahanian-Najafabadi, M. Rostami, M. Mirzaei and F. Hassanzadeh, Res. Pharm. Sci., 12, 500 (2017); https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-5362.217430
D. Chen, M. Zhao, W. Tan, Y. Li, X. Li, Y. Li and X. Fan, Eur. J. Pharm. Sci., 130, 100 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2019.01.020
C.E. DeSantis, M. Ma, M.M. Gaudet, L.A. Newman, K.D. Miller, A. Goding Sauer, R.L. Siegel and A. Jemal, CA: Cancer J. Clin., 69, 438 (2019); https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21583
H. Sung, J. Ferlay, R.L. Siegel, M. Laversanne, I. Soerjomataram, A. Jemal and F. Bray, CA: Cancer J. Clin., 71, 209 (2021); https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660
C.-R. Zhao, R.-Q. Wang, G. Li, X.-X. Xue, C.-J. Sun, X.-J. Qu and W.-B. Li, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 23, 1989 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2013.02.034
X. Zhai, Q. Huang, N. Jiang, D. Wu, H. Zhou and P. Gong, Molecules, 18, 2904 (2013); https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules18032904
M. Priyadarshini and N.A.N. Raj, Photodiagnosis Photodynam. Ther., 50, 104411 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2024.104411
A. Janem, G. Omar, O. Hamed, S. Jodeh, A. Deghles, A. Berisha, W. Mansour, S.A. Jabal, O. Fares, A. Jaser, A. Amireh and G. Adwan, Heliyon, 10, e33808 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33808
F.O.A. Frejat, H. Zhai, Y. Cao, L. Wang, Y.A. Mostafa, H.A.M. Gomaa, B.G.M. Youssif and C. Wu, Bioorg. Chem., 126, 105922 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2022.105922