Issue

Vol. 37 No. 9 (2025): Vol 37 Issue 9, 2025

Copyright (c) 2025 Arvind Kumar

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Anticorrosivity of Electroless Ni-P-TiO2 Nanoplatings against Hydrogen Peroxide Solution

https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2025.34377
Arvind Kumar
Department of Physics, Graphic Era Deemed to be University, Dehradun-248001, India
https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0117-7447
Abhishek Gupta
Department of Chemistry, D.B.S. (PG) College, Dehradun-248001, India
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6850-0982
Prashant Singh
Department of Chemistry, D.A.V. (PG) College, Dehradun-248001, India
https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0146-5285
Sulaxna Sharma
Department of Applied Science & Humanities, THDC Institute of Hydropower Engineering and Technology, Bhagirathi Puram, Tehri- 249001, India
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3960-5694
Awanish Sharma
Department of Physics, Graphic Era Deemed to be University, Dehradun-248001, India
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4715-917X

Corresponding Author(s) : Arvind Kumar

arvindkumardbsphy@gmail.com

Asian Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 37 No. 9 (2025): Vol 37 Issue 9, 2025

Abstract

The pollution regulator measurements have resulted replacement of chlorine/chlorine dioxide through hydrogen peroxides as bleaching chemicals specially in paper, dye and textile industries. Adaptation of changed chemicals, generally affects the corrosion aspects, suitability of existing plant metallurgy, materials of construction of equipment and environmental conditions. The surface platings besides non-sactrificial, recently have acted as an obstacle between steel substrates and corrosive environments. Accordingly, a long-term immersion and electrochemical corrosion tests were conducted on steels (MS, SS 316L) and electroless plated Ni-P and Ni-P-TiO2 nanomaterials in hydrogen peroxide solutions at pH 9.1 ± 0.1 and an E-pH was diagram drawn for H2O-H2O2 system alongside Shannon entropy values were calculated by MATLAB software and are used to understand the corrosivity of the peroxide media and protection mechanism of tested materials. On the basis of long-term immersion corrosion test, electrochemical corrosion tests, an H2O-H2O2 E-pH diagram, Shannon entropy values and cost to mechanical properties; the different tested materials may be graded in terms of their resistance against uniform/localized type corrosion for handling peroxide test media in following manner: Ni-P-TiO2 as-plated > Ni-P-TiO2 heated > Ni-P as-plated > Ni-P heated ~SS316L > MS. The better cost/strength ratio of Ni-P-TiO2 platings make these materials as more suitable for handling peroxide media with/without Cl content.

Keywords

Steels Electroless nickel E-pH Hydrogen peroxide Shannon entropy Corrosion
(1)
Kumar, A.; Gupta, A.; Singh, P.; Sharma, S.; Sharma, A. Anticorrosivity of Electroless Ni-P-TiO2 Nanoplatings Against Hydrogen Peroxide Solution. ajc 2025, 37, 2313-2321.
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. R. Aslam, M. Mobin, S. Zehra and J. Aslam, J. Mol. Liq., 364, 119992 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2022.119992
  2. B. Fotovvati, N. Namdari and A. Dehghanghadikolaei, J. Manuf. Mater. Process., 3, 28 (2019); https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp3010028
  3. A. Al-Azzawi and P. Baumli, Mater. Sci. Eng., 40, 26 (2015).
  4. J. Jeevanandam, A. Barhoum, Y.S. Chan, A. Dufresne and M.K. Danquah, Beilstein J. Nanotechnol., 9, 1050 (2018); https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.9.98
  5. J. Sudagar, J. Lian and W. Sha, J. Alloys Compd., 571, 183 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.03.107
  6. D. Seifzadeh and Z. Rajabalizadeh, Surf. Coat. Technol., 218, 119 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.12.039
  7. Y. De Hazan, F. Knies, D. Burnat, T. Graule, Y. Yamada-Pittini, C. Aneziris and M. Kraak, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 365, 163 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2011.09.032
  8. M. Ram, S. Sharma, A. Ansari and A.K. Sharma, AIP Conf. Proc. 2335, 080010 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043715
  9. H. Luo, M. Leitch, H. Zeng and J.-L. Luo, Mater. Today Phys., 4, 36 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtphys.2018.03.001
  10. D.R. Dhakal, G. Gyawali, Y.K. Kshetri, J.-H. Choi and S.W. Lee, Surf. Coat. Technol., 381, 125135 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.125135
  11. A. Mukhopadhyay, T.K. Barman and P. Sahoo, Tribol. Trans., 61, 41 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1080/10402004.2016.1271929
  12. D.H. Xia, C. Deng, D. Macdonald, S. Jamali, D. Mills, J.L. Luo, M.G. Strebl, M. Amiri, W. Jin, S. Song and W. Hu, J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 112, 151 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2021.11.004
  13. U.D. Bagale, S.H. Sonawane, B.A. Bhanvase, R.D. Kulkarni and P.R. Gogate, Green Process Synth., 7, 147 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1515/gps-2016-0160
  14. T. Chen, B. Wang, Z. Qi, Z. Guo, Y. Tian and F. Meng, ACS Appl. Nano Mater., 5, 9780 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.2c01993
  15. Y. Li, N. Kawashima, J. Li, A.P. Chandra and A.R. Gerson, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 1, 197-198 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2013.03.004
  16. H. Nazari, G.B. Darband and R. Arefinia, J. Mater. Sci., 58, 4292 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-023-08281-1
  17. M.A. Shoeib, M.M. Kamel, S.M. Rashwan and O.M. Hafez, Surf. Interface Anal., 47, 672 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1002/sia.5764
  18. J. Novakovic, P. Vassiliou, K.L. Samara and T. Argyropoulos, Surf. Coat. Tech., 201, 895 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.01.005
  19. H. Chakhtouna, H. Benzeid, N. Zari, A. Qaiss and R. Bouhfid, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int., 28, 44638 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14996-y
  20. Y. Nosaka, Catalysts, 12, 1557 (2022); https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12121557
  21. M.T. Noman, M.A. Ashraf and A. Ali, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int., 26, 3262 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3884-z
  22. Q. Zhao, C. Liu, X. Su, S. Zhang, W. Song, S. Wang, G. Ning, J. Ye, Y. Lin and W. Gong, Appl. Surf. Sci., 274, 101 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.02.112
  23. W. Chen, W. Gao and Y. He, Surf. Coat. Technol., 204, 2493 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.01.032
  24. M.S. Hasan, F. Zemajtis, M. Nosonovsky and K. Sobolev, J. Tribol., 144, 081402 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4053777
  25. S. Akhtar, K. Shahzad, S. Mushtaq, I. Ali, M.H. Rafe and S.M. Fazal Ul-Karim, Mater. Res. Express, 6, 105409 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab3b27
  26. A. Bachvarova-Nedelcheva, R. Iordanova, A. Naydenov, A. Stoyanova, N. Georgieva, V. Nemska and T. Foteva, Catalysts, 13, 257 (2023); https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13020257
  27. P.M. Kallel, Z. Anther, M. Masseoud, S. Vesco, M. Barletta and k. Elleuch, Ceramics Int., 47, 10 (202 1); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.02.023
  28. G. John, M.E. Sahayaraj, J.T.W. Jappes and S.J. Leon, Period. Mineral., 92, 67 (2023); https://doi.org/10.37896/pd92.2/9224
  29. I. Vranken, J. Baudry, M. Aubinet, M. Visser and J. Bogaert, Landsc. Ecol., 30, 51 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-014-0105-0
  30. X. Zhang, X. Dai, L. Gao, D. Xu, H. Wan, Y. Wang and L. Yan, Chem. Soc. Rev., 52, 6806 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1039/D3CS00347G
  31. J.L. Braun, C.M. Rost, M. Lim, A. Giri, D.H. Olson, G.N. Kotsonis, G. Stan, D.W. Brenner, J.-P. Maria and P.E. Hopkins, Adv. Mater., 30, 1805004 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201805004
  32. A. Sharma, Ph.D. Thesis, Corrosion Investigations in Pulping and Bleaching Media, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, India (2006).
  33. J. Kisel, Ph.D. Thesis, Study of Tin(II)/Tin(IV)/Anhydrous Hydro-chloric Acid based Sensitizers for Electroless Deposition, University of Windsor, Canada, National Library of Canada (1989).
  34. B.D. Cullity, Elements of X-Rays Diffraction., Addison-Wesley Publishing Co. Inc., Reading Mass, USA (1956).
  35. Powder Diffraction File, Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards (JCPDS-File) (1978).
  36. S. Sharma and A. Kumar, J. Mol. Liq., 322, 114862 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2020.114862
  37. A.I. Vogel, Quantitative Inorganic Analysis, 296, London, Longman, Green & Co. (1964).
  38. ASTM G1-05, Standard Practice for Preparing, Cleaning and Evaluating Corrosion Test Specimens, 3(2) (2025).
  39. M. Pourbaix, Atlas of Electrochemical Equilibria in Aqueous Solutions, Houston, NACE, p. 256 (1974).
  40. ASTM G78, Standard Guide for Crevice Corrosion Testing of Iron Base and Nickel Base Stainless alloys in Sea water and other chloride containing aqueous Environments., 3(2) (1991).
  41. S. Raji, A. Popoola and O. Akanji, J. Mol. Struct., 1312, 138414 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2024.138414
  42. Y. Fujimori, M. Shimizu, T. Kurashina, and S. Arai, Mater. Lett., 350, 134869 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2023.134869
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 177 Download : 108
PlumX