Issue

Vol. 37 No. 4 (2025): Vol 37 Issue 4, 2025

Copyright (c) 2025 Aditya Gupta, Indu Saxena, Syed Mohammed Ejaz, Divyanshi Mishra, Preeti Yadav

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Investigations on the Synergistic Effects of Ionic Surfactants on Atenolol using Ultrasonics, Molecular Docking and ADMET Techniques

https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2025.33337
Aditya Gupta
Department of Chemistry, University of Lucknow, Lucknow-226007, India
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5736-8098
Indu Saxena
Department of Chemistry, University of Lucknow, Lucknow-226007, India
https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5767-2401
Syed Mohammed Ejaz
Department of Chemistry, University of Lucknow, Lucknow-226007, India
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1866-6225
Divyanshi Mishra
Department of Chemistry, University of Lucknow, Lucknow-226007, India
https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6518-6523
Preeti Yadav
Department of Chemistry, University of Lucknow, Lucknow-226007, India
https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9154-380X

Corresponding Author(s) : Indu Saxena

indu_lu@yahoo.com

Asian Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 37 No. 4 (2025): Vol 37 Issue 4, 2025

Abstract

Among the various ailments, cardiovascular diseases are particularly notable, requiring complex medication procedures that frequently come with unwanted side effects. β-Blockers cardiovascular drugs are in high usage due to cardiovascular diseases. Therefore, the present investigation explores an encouraging approach to improve the solubilization, drug delivery and excretion characteristics of the β-blocker drugs atenolol through a strategy derived from surfactants. The investigation focuses on the interaction between sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) with atenolol. Employing a multifaceted approach, both physical and acoustic parameters across various solutions were explored. The relative density, viscosity, ultrasonic velocity of sound and specific conductance were determined as physical parameters. Physical findings reveal the increase in critical micelle concentration (CMC) value of SDS from 8.0-13.9 mmol. This synergistic molecular interactions between SDS and atenolol as depicted from physical, acoustical and computational (molecular docking and ADMET) analysis. Moreover, the enhanced solubilization of atenolol in the presence of SDS as supported by CMC values, underscores the potential of surfactant in drug delivery and excretion applications. Furthermore, the acoustic parameters such as adiabatic compressibility, acoustic impedance, viscous relaxation time and intermolecular free length support the findings.

Keywords

Cardiovascular drugs Ionic surfactants Acoustic parameters Drug delivery Molecular docking ADMET analysis
(1)
Gupta, A.; Saxena, I.; Ejaz, S. M.; Mishra, D.; Yadav, P. Investigations on the Synergistic Effects of Ionic Surfactants on Atenolol Using Ultrasonics, Molecular Docking and ADMET Techniques. ajc 2025, 37, 779-788.
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. R.E. Baker, A.S. Mahmud, I.F. Miller, M. Rajeev, F. Rasambainarivo, B.L. Rice, S. Takahashi, A.J. Tatem, C.E. Wagner, L.-F. Wang, A. Wesolowski and C.J.E. Metcalf, Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 20, 193 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-021-00639-z
  2. C. Andersson and R.S. Vasan, Nat. Rev. Cardiol., 15, 230 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2017.154
  3. D.R. Jacobs Jr., J.G. Woo, A.R. Sinaiko, S.R. Daniels, J. Ikonen, M. Juonala, N. Kartiosuo, T. Lehtimäki, C.G. Magnussen, J.S.A. Viikari, N. Zhang, L.A. Bazzano, T.L. Burns, R.J. Prineas, J. Steinberger, E.M. Urbina, A.J. Venn, O.T. Raitakari and T. Dwyer, N. Engl. J. Med., 386, 1877 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2109191
  4. S.P. Moulik, A.K. Rakshit and B. Naskar, J. Surf. Deterg., 27, 895 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1002/jsde.12757
  5. L.M. Moreira and J.P. Lyonb, Pubvet, 16, 1 (2022); https://doi.org/10.31533/pubvet.v16n04a1083.1-6
  6. A. Casandra, R.-Y. Tsay, B.A. Noskov, L. Liggieri and S.-Y. Lin, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng., 92, 2 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2018.01.042
  7. S. Chakraborty, A. Chakraborty and S.K. Saha, RSC Adv., 4, 32579 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA03937H
  8. B. Tah, P. Pal, M. Mahato and G.B. Talapatra, J. Phys. Chem. B, 115, 8493 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1021/jp202578s
  9. G.-G. Ying, Environ. Int., 32, 417 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2005.07.004
  10. A. Mukhija and N. Kishore, J. Mol. Liq., 265, 1 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2018.05.107
  11. B.B. Herlofson and P. Barkvoll, Acta Odontol. Scand., 54, 150 (1996); https://doi.org/10.3109/00016359609003515
  12. J.B. Dressman, G.L. Amidon, C. Reppas and V.P. Shah, Pharm. Res., 15, 11 (1998); https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011984216775
  13. S.M. Shaban, J. Kang and D.-H. Kim, Composites Commun., 22, 100537 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coco.2020.100537
  14. N. Yekeen, M.A. Manan, A.K. Idris and A.M. Samin, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng., 149, 612 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2016.11.018
  15. C. Vakh and S. Koronkiewicz, Trends Analyt. Chem., 165, 117143 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2023.117143
  16. C. Healy, M. Paterson, S. JoystonBechal, D. Williams and M. Thornhill, Oral Dis., 5, 39 (1999); https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-0825.1999.tb00062.x
  17. B.S. Gupta, C.-R. Shen and M.-J. Lee, Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp., 529, 64 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2017.05.066
  18. Y. Fan, Y. Liu, J. Xi and R. Guo, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 360, 148 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2011.04.009
  19. L.Y. Zakharova et al., Organic Materials as Smart Nanocarriers for Drug Delivery; Elsevier, 2018; pp 601–618; https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813663-8.00014-2
  20. C. Zhang, F. Cui, G. Zeng, M. Jiang, Z. Yang, Z. Yu, M. Zhu and L. Shen, Sci. Total Environ., 518–519, 352 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.03.007
  21. S.E. Jørgensen and B. Halling-Sørensen, Chemosphere, 40, 691 (2000); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(99)00438-5
  22. H.A. Navare, R.F. Frye, R.M. Cooper-DeHoff, J.J. Shuster, K. Hall, S.O.F. Schmidt, S.T. Turner and J.A. Johnson, Pharmacotherapy, 30, 872 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1592/phco.30.9.872
  23. H. Al-Hamidi, A.A. Edwards, M.A. Mohammad and A. Nokhodchi, Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces, 76, 170 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.10.030
  24. S. Gupta, R. Kesarla and A. Omri, ISRN Pharm., 2013, 848043 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/848043
  25. S. Chauhan, M.S. Chauhan, D. Kaushal, V.K. Syal and J. Jyoti, J. Solution Chem., 39, 622 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10953-010-9534-9
  26. J. Ramyasree, A.A. Hindustan, H. Chinthaguinjala, T. Reshma, H.V.C. Venkata and K.Y. Bharath, Int. J. Pharma Bio Sci., 10, (2020); https://doi.org/10.22376/ijpbs/lpr.2020.10.5.P11-16
  27. S. Sarkar, G. Chakraborty and H. Pal, Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces, 237, 113839 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2024.113839
  28. G. Pifferi, P. Santoro and M. Pedrani, Farmaco, 54, 1 (1999); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-827X(98)00101-3
  29. A. Delmonte, F.F. Visentini, J.L. Fernández, L.G. Santiago and A.A. Perez, Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces, 235, 113783 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2024.113783
  30. A. Singh, K.R. Ansari, I.H. Ali, N. Raj Sharma, A. Bansal, A.K. Alanazi, M. Younas, A.H. Alamri, Y. Lin and A. Noureldeen, J. Mol. Liq., 391, 123305 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2023.123305
  31. M. Rahman, A. Hussain, M.S. Hussain, M.A. Mirza and Z. Iqbal, Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm., 39, 1 (2013); https://doi.org/10.3109/03639045.2012.660949
  32. C. Das and B. Das, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 54, 559 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1021/je8005024
  33. J. Fan, A. Fu and L. Zhang, Quant. Biol., 7, 83 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1007/s40484-019-0172-y
  34. L.H. Blanco and E.F. Vargas, Instrum. Sci. Technol., 32, 13 (2004); https://doi.org/10.1081/CI-120027343
  35. I. Saxena, R.N. Pathak, V. Kumar and R. Devi, Int. J. Appl. Res., 1, 562 (2018); https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.35801.83044
  36. M.A. ZielinskaPisklak, D.M. Pisklak and I. Wawer, Magn. Reson. Chem., 49, 284 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1002/mrc.2742
  37. M. Dzida, M. Chorazewski, M. Geppert-Rybczynska, E. Zorebski, M. Zorebski, M. Zarska and B. Czech, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 58, 1571 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1021/je301192s
  38. D.F. Veber, S.R. Johnson, H.-Y. Cheng, B.R. Smith, K.W. Ward and K.D. Kopple, J. Med. Chem., 45, 2615 (2002); https://doi.org/10.1021/jm020017n
  39. A.K. Ghose, V.N. Viswanadhan and J.J. Wendoloski, J. Comb. Chem., 1, 55 (1999); https://doi.org/10.1021/cc9800071
  40. J.S. Delaney, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 44, 1000 (2004); https://doi.org/10.1021/ci034243x
  41. B. Iskandar, H.-C. Mei, T.-W. Liu, H.-M. Lin and C.-K. Lee, Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces, 234, 113692 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2023.113692
  42. R.J. Fort and W.R. Moore, Trans. Faraday Soc., 61, 2102 (1965); https://doi.org/10.1039/tf9656102102
  43. W. Marczak, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 41, 1462 (1996); https://doi.org/10.1021/je960185i
  44. S. Hoche, M.A. Hussein and T. Becker, Ultrasonics, 57, 65 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2014.10.017
  45. K. Ito, K. Yoshida, H. Maruyama, J. Mamou and T. Yamaguchi, Ultrasound Med. Biol., 43, 700 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2016.11.011
  46. K. Saravanakumar, R. Baskaran and T.R. Kubendran, Russ. J. Phys. Chem. A. Focus Chem., 86, 1947 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036024412130195
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 242 Download : 137
PlumX