Issue

Vol. 36 No. 8 (2024): Vol 36 Issue 8, 2024

Copyright (c) 2024 MD NURUL ISLAM SIDDIQUE

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Kinetic Modeling of Sodium Bicarbonate Pre-treatment of Corn Stalks for Increased Biogas Generation during Anaerobic Digestion: Viability and Fertilizer Potential

Kinetic modeling of sodium bicarbonate pre-treatment of corn stalks for increased biogas generation during anaerobic digestion: Viability and fertilizer potential
https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2024.31820
Md. Nurul Islam Siddique
Faculty of Ocean Engineering Technology, University Malaysia Terengganu, 21030 Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysia
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1480-5988
Zaied Bin Khalid
Faculty of Engineering Technology, University Malaysia Pahang, 26030 Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2762-2101
Mohd. Zamri Bin Ibrahim
Faculty of Ocean Engineering Technology, University Malaysia Terengganu, 21030 Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysia
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9439-8552
Nora'aini Binti Ali
Faculty of Engineering Technology, University Malaysia Pahang, 26030 Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia; Institute of Tropical Aquaculture & Fisheries, University Malaysia Terengganu, Kuala Nerus, Malaysia
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1391-2757
Nazaitulshila Rasit
Faculty of Ocean Engineering Technology, University Malaysia Terengganu, 21030 Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysia
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0751-0954
Muhammad Syarifuddin Yahya
Faculty of Ocean Engineering Technology, University Malaysia Terengganu, 21030 Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysia
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6364-0636
Sajal Kumar Adhikary
Department of Civil Engineering, Khulna University Engineering & Technology, Khulna-9203, Bangladesh
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9899-8531

Corresponding Author(s) : Md. Nurul Islam Siddique

m.nurul@umt.edu.my

Asian Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 36 No. 8 (2024): Vol 36 Issue 8, 2024

Abstract

Sustainability in terms of the economy and the environment is severely hampered by poor waste management in the industrial sectors and a lack of renewable energy sources to meet expanding energy demands. To address this issue, the influences of sodium bicarbonate treatment on biogas generation during the anaerobic fermentation of corn stalks were analyzed. The application of sodium bicarbonate (9%, w/w) resulted in a significantly higher generation of 14692 mL biogas with a production of 223 mL/g, which was 30% higher than the untreated sample biogas generation. Surprisingly, chemical oxygen demand elimination was boosted by a factor of ten. In addition, sodium bicarbonate stabilized the pH of fermented corn stalks. The Gompertz modeling, according to the findings, had a significant correlation coefficient (> 0.995) and fit the accumulative biogas production trends well. Sludge recapture from the fermented effluent was 0.08 m3 sludge/m3 wastewater. Sodium bicarbonate added to corn stalks may increased the cumulative methane production while lowering chemical oxygen demand (COD) levels.

Keywords

Anaerobic digestion Cornstalk Methane Sodium bicarbonate Pre-treatment
Siddique, M. N. I., Khalid, Z. B., Ibrahim, M. Z. B., Ali, N. B., Rasit, N., Yahya, M. S., & Adhikary, S. K. (2024). Kinetic Modeling of Sodium Bicarbonate Pre-treatment of Corn Stalks for Increased Biogas Generation during Anaerobic Digestion: Viability and Fertilizer Potential: Kinetic modeling of sodium bicarbonate pre-treatment of corn stalks for increased biogas generation during anaerobic digestion: Viability and fertilizer potential. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 36(8), 1889–1894. https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2024.31820
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. J. Malinauskaite, H. Jouhara, D. Czajczynska, P. Stanchev, E. Katsou, P. Rostkowski, R.J. Thorne, J. Colón, S. Ponsá, F. Al-Mansour, L. Anguilano, R. Krzyzynska, I.C. López, A.Vlasopoulos and N. Spencer, Energy, 141, 2013 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.11.128
  2. M. Balali-Mood, K. Naseri, Z. Tahergorabi, M.R. Khazdair and M. Sadeghi, Front. Pharmacol., 12, 643972 (2021); https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.643972
  3. M. Zaynab, R. Al-Yahyai, A. Ameen, Y. Sharif, L. Ali, M. Fatima, K.A. Khan and S. Li, J. King Saud Univ. Sci., 34, 101653 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2021.101653
  4. B.K. Zaied, M. Nasrullah, M.N.I. Siddique, A.W. Zularisam, L. Singh and S. Krishnan, Sci. Total Environ., 706, 136095 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136095
  5. B.K. Zaied, M. Nasrullah, M.N. Islam Siddique, A.W. Zularisam, L. Singh and S. Krishnan, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 8, 103551 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2019.103551
  6. F.M. Liew, M.E. Martin, R.C. Tappel, B.D. Heijstra, C. Mihalcea and M. Köpke, Front. Microbiol., 7, 694 (2016); https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00694
  7. T. Nevzorova and V. Kutcherov, Energy Strategy Rev., 26, 100414 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.100414
  8. K.H. Hama Aziz, F.S. Mustafa, K.M. Omer, S. Hama, R.F. Hamarawf and K.O. Rahman, RSC Adv., 13, 17595 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1039/D3RA00723E
  9. N.A.A. Qasem, R.H. Mohammed and D.U. Lawal, NPJ Clean Water, 4, 36 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1038/s41545-021-00127-0
  10. Z.B. Khalid, M.N.I. Siddique, A. Nayeem, T.M. Adyel, S.B. Ismail and M.Z. Ibrahim, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 9, 105489 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.105489
  11. K.K. Sodhi, L.C. Mishra, C.K. Singh and M. Kumar, Curr. Res. Microb. Sci., 3, 100166 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crmicr.2022.100166
  12. M. Nasrullah, M.N.I. Siddique and A.W. Zularisam, Asian J. Chem., 26, 4281 (2014); https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2014.16134
  13. M. Ahmaruzzaman and V.K. Gupta, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 50, 13589 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1021/ie201477c
  14. Z. Shamsollahi and A. Partovinia, J. Environ. Manage., 246, 314 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.145
  15. J.K. Sahoo, A. Hota, C. Singh, S. Barik, N. Sahu, S.K. Sahoo, M.K. Sahu and H. Sahoo, Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem., 103, 9131 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2021.2003349
  16. B.K. Zaied, M.N.I. Siddique, A.W. Zularisam, M.F. Ahmad and Y.M. Salih, Asian J. Chem., 31, 2413 (2019); https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2019.22196
  17. T. Mitra, N. Bar and S.K. Das, SN Appl. Sci., 1, 486 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-0513-5
  18. Z.B. Khalid, M.N.I. Siddique, A. Nayeem, T.M. Adyel, S.B. Ismail and M.Z. Ibrahim, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 9, 105489 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.105489
  19. S. Krishnan, L. Singh, P. Mishra, M. Nasrullah, M. Sakinah, S. Thakur, N.I. Siddique and Z.A. Wahid, Environ. Technol. Innov., 8, 360 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2017.08.005
  20. Z.B. Khalid, M.N.I. Siddique, M. Nasrullah, L. Singh, Z.B.A. Wahid and M.F. Ahmad, Environ. Technol. Innov., 16, 100446 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2019.100446
  21. S. He, Z. Li, X. Shi, H. Yang, L. Gong and X. Cheng, Adv. Powder Technol., 26, 537 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2015.01.002
  22. (47) P.N.Y. Yek, C. Li, W. Peng, C.S. Wong, R.K. Liew, W.A. Wan Mahari, C. Sonne and S.S. Lam, Chem. Eng. J., 425, 131886 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.131886
  23. Q. Yang, S. Ravnskov, J.W.M. Pullens and M.N. Andersen, Sci. Total Environ., 816, 151649 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151649
  24. Z. Shi, M. Usman, J. He, H. Chen, S. Zhang and G. Luo, Water Res., 205, 117679 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2021.117679
  25. A. González-González, F. Cuadros, A. Ruiz-Celma and F. López-Rodríguez, Bioresour. Technol., 136, 109 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.02.031
  26. A. Pant and J.P.N. Rai, Environmental Challenges, 5, 100262 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2021.100262
  27. G. Kaur, D. Johnravindar and J.W.C. Wong, Bioresour. Technol., 308, 123250 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123250
  28. D. Johnravindar, J.W.C. Wong, D. Chakraborty, G. Bodedla and G. Kaur, J. Environ. Manage., 290, 112457 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112457
  29. Z. Yang, Z. Wang, G. Liang, X. Zhang and X. Xie, Chem. Eng. J., 426, 131777 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.131777
  30. F. Zheng, J. Fang, F. Guo, X. Yang, T. Liu, M. Chen, M. Nie and Y. Chen, Chem. Eng. J., 432, 134377 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.134377
  31. S. Chou, C. Huang and Y.-H. Huang, Chemosphere, 39, 1997 (1999); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(99)00089-2
  32. I. Carra, J.A. Sánchez Pérez, S. Malato, O. Autin, B. Jefferson and P. Jarvis, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 91, 72 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.4577
  33. M.O. Saeed, K. Azizli, M.H. Isa, M.J. Bashir and J. Water, Protein Eng., 8, e7 (2015).
  34. K.H. Ng and C.K. Cheng, Chem. Eng. J., 300, 127 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.04.105
  35. C.A. Henard, H.K. Smith and M.T. Guarnieri, Metab. Eng., 41, 152 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2017.03.007
  36. G. Oh, L. Zhang and D. Jahng, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 83, 1204 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.1923
  37. N. Anwar, W. Wang, J. Zhang, Y. Li, C. Chen, G. Liu and R. Zhang, Water Sci. Technol., 73, 1865 (2016); https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2016.035
  38. K. Hagos, J. Zong, D. Li, C. Liu and X. Lu, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 76, 1485 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.184
  39. S. Xie, F.I. Hai, X. Zhan, W. Guo, H.H. Ngo, W.E. Price and L.D. Nghiem, Bioresour. Technol., 222, 498 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.10.015
  40. M.K. Lam and K.T. Lee, Biotechnol. Adv., 29, 124 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.10.001
  41. K. Le Van and T.T. Luong Thi, Prog. Nat. Sci., 24, 191 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnsc.2014.05.012
  42. Environmental Quality (Pollution Control From Solid Waste Transfer Stations and Landfills) Regulations 2009 – P.U. (A) 433/2009; https://www.doe.gov.my/en/environmental-quality-pollution-control-from-solid-waste-transfer-stations-and-landfills-regulations-2009-p-u-a-433-2009/
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0