Issue

Vol. 36 No. 10 (2024): Vol 36 Issue 10, 2024

Copyright (c) 2024 Shallu Saini, Hardeep Singh Tuli, Ritu Chauhan, Ujjawal Sharma, Poonam Bansal

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Ethyl Oleate, Hexadecenoic Acid, Phytol Profiling of Onosma bracteatum: Antibacterial, Anticancer and Molecular Docking Studies

https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2024.32310
Shallu Saini
Department of Bio-Sciences and Technology, Maharishi Markandeshwar Engineering College, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to Be University), Mullana, Ambala-133207, India
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3207-8251
Hardeep Singh Tuli
Department of Bio-Sciences and Technology, Maharishi Markandeshwar Engineering College, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to Be University), Mullana, Ambala-133207, India
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1155-0094
Ritu Chauhan
Department of Biotechnology, Graphic Era Deemed to Be University, Dehradun-248002, India
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9056-6619
Ujjawal Sharma
Department of Human Genetics and Molecular Medicine, School of Health Sciences, Central University of Punjab, Bathinda-151401, India
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2087-080X
Poonam Bansal
Department of Bio-Sciences and Technology, Maharishi Markandeshwar Engineering College, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to Be University), Mullana, Ambala-133207, India
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5756-1034

Corresponding Author(s) : Shallu Saini

shalucool37@gmail.com

Asian Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 36 No. 10 (2024): Vol 36 Issue 10, 2024

Abstract

Research studies on phytochemicals and antibiotics utilizing extracts from medicinal plants have proliferated in the past few years. The phytochemicals profiling, antioxidant capacity, antibacterial properties, antiproliferative potential and molecular docking studies of ethanolic extract of Onosma bracteatum was examined in this study. The extract prepared into ethanol (80%) and identify the presence of phytochemical compounds using GC-MS profiling. The antibacterial potential was investigated in relation to Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. Further to evaluate the anticancer potential of ethanolic extract of O. bracteatum, the antiproliferative assay (MTT cytotoxicity assay) was performed against Ln-18 (human malignant glioma cell line) and A-549 (Human lung cancer cell line) cells. Ethyl oleate, hexadecenoic acid and phytol were highest in GC-MS and docked against DNA gyrase B (E. coli), β-lactamase (S. aureus) and BCL-2 (apoptosis inhibitor). In antioxidant assay, 78% maximum inhibition of free radical scavenging activity was observed. The zone of inhibition was in the ranges from 9 mm (E. coli) to 20 mm (S. aureus). Furthermore, the ethanolic extract of O. bracteatum demonstrated antiproliferative activity against the cancer cell lines LN-18 and A-549 with growth inhibitions of 84% and 81%. The ethyl oleate was found to be best compound with -8.4 (kcal/mol) binding score in the molecular docking studies. The results showed that O. bracteatum is a good source of phytochemicals and antibacterial compounds with promising anticancerous potential.

Keywords

Onosma bracteatum Phytochemical compounds Antibacterial activity Anticancer activity Docking studies
Saini, S., Tuli, H. S., Chauhan, R., Sharma, U., & Bansal, P. (2024). Ethyl Oleate, Hexadecenoic Acid, Phytol Profiling of Onosma bracteatum: Antibacterial, Anticancer and Molecular Docking Studies. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 36(10), 2300–2306. https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2024.32310
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. I. Jahan and A. Onay, Turk. J. Biol., 44, 228 (2020); https://doi.org/10.3906/biy-2005-114
  2. M. Masoumian and M. Zandi, Zahedan J. Res. Med. Sci., 19, (2017); https://doi.org/10.5812/zjrms.10080
  3. A.N. Garmana, E.Y. Sukandar and I. Fidrianny, Procedia Chem., 13, 164 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proche.2014.12.021
  4. J.F. López-Sáez, C. De la Torre, J. Pincheira and G.G. Martín, Histol. Histopathol., 13, 1197 (1998); https://doi.org/10.14670/HH-13.1197
  5. N. Khomarlou, P. Aberoomand-Azar, A.P. Lashgari, H. Tebyanian, A. Hakakian, R. Ranjbar and S.A. Ayatollahi, Acta Biol. Hung., 69, 144 (2018).
  6. F.J. Álvarez-Martínez, E. Barrajón-Catalán, M. Herranz-López and V. Micol, Phytomedicine, 90, 153626 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2021.153626
  7. A.C. Abreu, A.J. McBain and M. Simões, Nat. Prod. Rep., 29, 1007 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1039/c2np20035j
  8. H. Yang, L. Sun, W. Li, G. Liu and Y. Tang, Front Chem., 6, 30 (2018); https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2018.00030
  9. Y. Pan, Y. Liu, R. Fujii, U. Farooq, L. Cheng, A. Matsuura, J. Qi and L. Xiang, Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev., 2021, 5469849 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5469849
  10. A. Kumar, V. Kaur, K. Pandit, H.S. Tuli, K. Sak, S.K. Jain and S. Kaur, Front. Pharmacol., 11, 1301 (2020); https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.01301
  11. K. Saravanakumar, C. Sarikurkcu, S.S. Sahinler, R.B. Sarikurkcu and M.H. Wang, Plants, 10, 1373 (2021); https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10071373
  12. N. Phuyal, P.K. Jha, P.P. Raturi and S. Rajbhandary, Scientific World J., 2020, 8780704 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8780704
  13. K. Nithianantham, M. Shyamala, Y. Chen, L.Y. Latha, S.L. Jothy and S. Sasidharan, Molecules, 16, 10134 (2011); https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules161210134
  14. G. Mickisch, S. Fajta, G. Keilhauer, E. Schlick, R. Tschada and P. Alken, Urol. Res., 18, 131 (1990); https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302474
  15. J. Lan, J. Ge, J. Yu, S. Shan, H. Zhou, S. Fan, Q. Zhang, X. Shi, Q. Wang, L. Zhang and X. Wang, Nature, 581, 215 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2180-5
  16. O. Trott and A.J. Olson, J. Comput. Chem., 31, 455 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21334
  17. A.M. Rajapara, V.P. Bhatt and M.B. Shah, Asian J. Biol. Life Sci., 10, 141 (2021); https://doi.org/10.5530/ajbls.2021.10.21
  18. Z. Liu, Z. Ren, C.C. Chuang, E. Kandaswamy, T. Zhou and L. Zuo, Front. Physiol., 9, 360203 (2018); https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.00477
  19. S. Naz, S. Ahmad, S. Ajaz Rasool, S. Asad Sayeed and R. Siddiqi, Microbiol. Res., 161, 43 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2005.05.001
  20. M.A. Khan, S. Ahmad, S. Ayaz and I. Ahamd, Pharmacologica, 4, 525 (2013); https://doi.org/10.5567/pharmacologia.2013.525.528
  21. H. Imran, A.U. Rahman, T. Sohail, S.I.H. Taqvi and Z. Yaqeen, Bangladesh J. Med. Sci., 17, 36 (2018); https://doi.org/10.3329/bjms.v17i1.35276
  22. A. Yasmin, K. Kousar, N. Anjum, O. Farooq and S. Ghafoor, Khyber J. Med. Sci., 11, 451 (2018).
  23. M.M. Rahman, M.B. Islam, M. Biswas and A.H.M. Khurshid Alam, BMC Res. Notes, 8, 621 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1618-6
  24. N. Kumar, R. Kumar and K. Kishore, Pharmacogn. Rev., 7, 140 (2013); https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-7847.120513
  25. C.B. Akin-Osanaiye, A.F. Gabriel and R.A. Alebiosu, Ann. Biol. Res., 2, 298 (2011).
  26. D. Sheela and F. Uthayakumari, Biosci. Discov., 4, 47 (2013).
  27. S. Sujatha, S. Anand, K.N. Sangeetha, K. Shilpa, J. Lakshmi, A. Balakrishnan and B.S. Lakshmi, Int. J. Diabetes Mellit., 2, 101 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdm.2009.12.013
  28. R.O. Silva, F.B.M. Sousa, S.R.B. Damasceno, N.S. Carvalho, V.G. Silva, F.R.M.A. Oliveira, D.P. Sousa, K.S. Aragão, A.L.R. Barbosa, R.M. Freitas and J.V.R. Medeiros, Fundam. Clin. Pharmacol., 28, 455 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1111/fcp.12049
  29. P.Z. Moghaddam, M. Mazandarani, M.R. Zolfaghari, M.T. Badeleh and E.A. Ghaemi, Afr. J. Microbiol. Res., 6, 1776 (2012); https://doi.org/10.5897/AJMR11.1225
  30. E.C. Jeyaseelan and P.J. Jashothan, Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed., 2, 717 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1016/S2221-1691(12)60216-0
  31. O.A. Kamaly, A.S. Alanazi, O. Noman and H. Imtara, J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents, 37, 6411 (2023); https://doi.org/10.23812/j.biol.regul.homeost.agents.20233711.608
  32. F. Etminani, A. Etminani, S.O. Hasson, H.K. Judi, S. Akter and M. Saki, Inform. Med. Unlocked, 37, 101186 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imu.2023.101186
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0