Issue

Vol. 26 No. 22 (2014): Vol 26 Issue 22

Copyright (c) 2014 AJC

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Theoretical Study on Surfactant Adsorption of Glycine Betaine on Gas-Liquid Interface

https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2014.17667
Pingping Zhang
Shandong Wanjie Medical College, Zibo 255213, P.R. China
Xue Zhang
Environment Research Institute, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, P.R. China
Mingbo Wang
Shandong Wanjie Medical College, Zibo 255213, P.R. China
Xiaomin Sun
Environment Research Institute, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, P.R. China

Corresponding Author(s) : Xiaomin Sun

sxmwch@sdu.edu.cn

Asian Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 26 No. 22 (2014): Vol 26 Issue 22

Abstract

Glycine betaine is known as an excellent surfactant and osmolyte from organisms. To investigate the mechanism of glycine betaine, dodecyl hydroxypropyl sulfo betaine is chosen as an example to simulate its adsorption with water on gas-liquid interface by quantum chemistry. With the methods of B3LYP, highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) are figured out and we find that LUMO of dodecyl hydroxypropyl sulfo betaine is more likely to gather to the positive charge center. Information of hydrogen bonds, charge change and bonding energy are listed, with the suggestion that number and postion of water impacts adsorption obviously.

Keywords

Glycine betaine Surfactant adsorption Gas-liquid interface Theoretical study
Zhang, P., Zhang, X., Wang, M., & Sun, X. (2014). Theoretical Study on Surfactant Adsorption of Glycine Betaine on Gas-Liquid Interface. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 26(22), 7731–7733. https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2014.17667
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. A. Sakamoto and N. Murata, Plant Cell Environ., 25, 163 (2002); doi:10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00790.x.
  2. P. Yancey, M. Clark, S. Hand, R. Bowlus and G. Somero, Science, 217, 1214 (1982); doi:10.1126/science.7112124.
  3. I. Degtyarenko, K.J. Jalkanen, A.A. Gurtovenko and R.M. Nieminen, J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci., 5, 277 (2008); doi:10.1166/jctn.2008.003.
  4. R. Ahmad, C.J. Lim and S.-Y. Kwon, Plant Biotechnol. Rep., 7, 49 (2013); doi:10.1007/s11816-012-0266-8.
  5. H.J. Bohnert, D.E. Nelson and R.G. Jensen, Plant Cell, 7, 1099 (1995); doi:10.1105/tpc.7.7.1099.
  6. D. Rhodes and A.D. Hanson, Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol., 44, 357 (1993); doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.44.060193.002041.
  7. T.H. Chen and N. Murata, Trends Plant Sci., 13, 499 (2008); doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2008.06.007.
  8. T.H. Chen and N. Murata, Plant Cell Environ., 34, 1 (2011); doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02232.x.
  9. E.-J. Park, Z. Jeknic´, T.H.H. Chen and N. Murata, Plant Biotechnol. J., 5, 422 (2007a); doi:10.1111/j.1467-7652.2007.00251.x.
  10. N. Von Weymarn, A. Nyyssola, T. Reinikainen, M. Leisola and H. Ojamo, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 55, 214 (2001); doi:10.1007/s002530000515.
  11. T. van der Heide and B. Poolman, J. Bacteriol., 182, 203 (2000); doi:10.1128/JB.182.1.203-206.2000.
  12. E.S. Courtenay, M.W. Capp, C.F. Anderson and M.T. Record, Biochemistry, 39, 4455 (2000); doi:10.1021/bi992887l.
  13. A. Di Michele, M. Freda, G. Onori, M. Paolantoni, A. Santucci and P. Sassi, J. Phys. Chem. B, 110, 21077 (2006); doi:10.1021/jp068055w.
  14. H.J.V. Tyrrell and M. Kennerley, J. Chem. Soc. A, 2724 (1968); doi:10.1039/j19680002724.
  15. M. Civera, A. Fornili, M. Sironi and S.L. Fornili, Chem. Phys. Lett., 367, 238 (2003); doi:10.1016/S0009-2614(02)01707-4.
  16. S. Venkatesan and S.-L. Lee, J. Mol. Model., 18, 5017 (2012); doi:10.1007/s00894-012-1501-5.
  17. P.P. Misra and N. Kishore, J. Chem. Thermodyn., 54, 453 (2012); doi:10.1016/j.jct.2012.05.031.
  18. M.J. Frisch, G.W. Trucks, H.B. Schlegel, J.A. Pople et al., Gaussian 03, Revision B. 03. Gaussian, Inc, Pittsburgh PA (2003).
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 1 Download : 0