Issue

Vol. 35 No. 9 (2023): Vol 35 Issue 9, 2023

Copyright (c) 2023 S. KHAMKON

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Preparation and Characterization of Cattail Cellulose Films as Environmentally Friendly for Drug-Controlled Release System

https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2023.28125
P. SRIHANAM
The Center of Excellence in Chemistry (PERCH-CIC) and Creative and Innovation Chemistry Research Unit, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Mahasarakham University, Kantharawichai District, Maha Sarakham 44150, Thailand
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4098-7148
S. KHAMKON
The Center of Excellence in Chemistry (PERCH-CIC) and Creative and Innovation Chemistry Research Unit, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Mahasarakham University, Kantharawichai District, Maha Sarakham 44150, Thailand
https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8682-696X

Corresponding Author(s) : S. KHAMKON

supaksiri.k@msu.ac.th

Asian Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 35 No. 9 (2023): Vol 35 Issue 9, 2023

Abstract

The objective of this work was to extract cellulose from cattail plants by treatment with 10 % (w/v) sodium hydroxide for 3 h at 80 ºC and bleached with 2% (v/v) sodium hypochlorite for 1 h. The sample was cut with 1% (v/v) sulfuric acid for 1 h to obtain 27.88% cellulose. The extracted cellulose was then prepared as films by casting method in a petri dish. The cellulose films were light brown and transparent with random direction of an orientation. The cellulose film increased transparency and flexibility by adding glycerol. The FTIR results clearly revealed the cellulose functional groups and some peaks being shifted when mixed glycerol. The cellulose films have a maximum decomposition temperature (Td,max) of 310-340 ºC and the decomposition temperature decreases slightly when mixed with glycerol. Mixing methylene blue, a sample hydrophilic drug, the cellulose films have increased their texture brittle and found micro-porous on surfaces. In addition, the differences in peaks of the cellulose functional groups were also observed. These might be caused by the interaction formation of methylene blue functional groups and cellulose. The interaction resulted in an increase in the Td,max of the films. The release of the methylene blue pattern concerned the amount of mixed methylene blue. These results can be used as a basis for extracting cellulose from cattail plants and preparing cellulose films for specific applications such as drug-controlled release system. 

Keywords

Cattail Cellulose extract Film Drug-controlled release system
SRIHANAM, P., & KHAMKON, S. (2023). Preparation and Characterization of Cattail Cellulose Films as Environmentally Friendly for Drug-Controlled Release System. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 35(9), 2241–2246. https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2023.28125
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. V. Cebrián-Lloret, M. Metz, A. Martínez-Abad, S.H. Knutsen, S. Ballance, A. López-Rubio and M. Martínez-Sanz, Algal Res., 61, 102576 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2021.102576
  2. M. Lassoued, F. Crispino and E. Loranger, Carbohydr. Polym., 254, 117411 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117411
  3. L. Lebreton and A. Andrady, Palgrave Commun., 5, 6 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0212-7
  4. D. Pasquini, E.M. Teixeira, A.A.S. Curvelo, M.N. Belgacem and A. Dufresne, Ind. Crops Prod., 32, 4860 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2010.06.022
  5. J. Bian, F. Peng, X.-P. Peng, F. Xu, R.-C. Sun and J.F. Kennedy, Carbohydr. Polym., 88, 638 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.01.010
  6. H. Nadji, P.N. Diouf, A. Benaboura, Y. Bedard, B. Riedl and T. Stevanovic, Bioresour. Technol., 100, 3585 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.01.074
  7. D. Trache, M.H. Hussin, C.T. Hui Chuin, S. Sabar, M.R.N. Fazita, O.F.A. Taiwo, T.M. Hassan and M.K.M. Haafiz, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 93, 789 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.09.056
  8. A. Rangan, M.V. Manchiganti, R.M. Thilaividankan, S.G. Kestur and R. Menon, Ind. Crops Prod., 103, 152 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.03.037
  9. M. El Achaby, Z. Kassab, A. Barakat and A. Aboulkas, Ind. Crops Prod., 112, 499 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.12.049
  10. A. Takegawa, M. Murakami, Y. Kaneko and J. Kadokawa, Carbohydr. Polym., 79, 85 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.07.030
  11. M. Ul-Islam, T. Khan and J.K. Park, Carbohydr. Polym., 88, 596 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.01.006
  12. J.S. Lee, B. Parameswaran, J.P. Lee and S.C. Park, J. Sci. Ind. Res., 67, 865 (2008); http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2430
  13. C. Felgueiras, N.G. Azoia, C. Gonçalves, M. Gama and F. Dourado, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 9, 608826 (2021); https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.608826
  14. K.L. Pickering, M.G.A. Efendy and T.M. Le, Compos., Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf., 83, 98 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.038
  15. D. Klemm, B. Heublein, H.P. Fink and A. Bohn, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 44, 3358 (2005); https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200460587
  16. K.R. Ningtyas, T.N. Agassi and P.G. Putri, IOP Conf. Series: Earth Environ. Sci., 1012, 012091 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1012/1/012091
  17. H. Seddiqi, E. Oliaei, H. Honarkar, J. Jin, L.C. Geonzon, R.G. Bacabac and J. Klein-Nulend, Cellulose, 28, 1893 (2021): https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03674-w
  18. B. Peng, Z. Yao, X. Wang, M. Crombeen, D. Gsweene and K.C. Tam, Green Energy Environ., 5, 37 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gee.2019.09.003
  19. F. Braun, W. Back and M. Krottenthaler, Brewing Sci., 62, 33 (2009); https://doi.org/10.23763/BRSC09-04BRAUN
  20. A. Rajeswari, E.J.S. Christy, E. Swathi and A. Pius, J. Environ. Chem. Ecotoxicol., 2, 107 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enceco.2020.07.003
  21. Y. Shi, Z. Yuan, T. Xu, R. Qu, J. Yuan, F. Cai, Y. Wang and X. Wang, Ind. Crops Prod., 134, 160 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.03.054
  22. R. Chandra and S. Yadav, Ecol. Eng., 36, 1277 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.06.003
  23. Y.-L. Chen, X.-Q. Hong, H. He, H.-W. Luo, T.-T. Qian, R.-Z. Li, H. Jiang and H.-Q. Yu, Bioresour. Technol., 160, 89 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.01.022
  24. F.E. Matheson and J.P. Sukias, Ecol. Eng., 36, 1260 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.05.005
  25. N.D. O’Luanaigh, R. Goodhue and L.W. Gill, Ecol. Eng., 36, 1266 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.06.002
  26. G. Wuzella, A.R. Mahendran, T. Bätge, S. Jury and A. Kandelbauer, Ind. Crops Prod., 33, 683 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.01.008
  27. H. Wissel, C. Mayr and A. Lücke, Org. Geochem., 39, 1545 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2008.07.014
  28. Y. Baimark, N. Niamsa, N. Morakot, J. Threeprom and Y. Srisuwan, Int. J. Polym. Anal. Charact., 12, 457 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1080/10236660701636108
  29. C.Y. Wang, K.L. Xia, Y.Y. Zhang and D.L. Kaplan, Acc. Chem. Res., 52, 2916 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00333
  30. R.K. Pal, A.A. Farghaly, M.M. Collinson, S.C. Kundu and V.K. Yadavalli, Adv. Mater., 28, 1406 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201504736
  31. N. Ramakrishnan, S. Sharma, A. Gupta and B.Y. Alashwal, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 111, 352 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.01.037
  32. M.S. Lee, C.-S. Hung, D.A. Phillips, C.C. Buck, M.K. Gupta and M.W. Lux, Synth. Syst. Biotechnol., 5, 145 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.synbio.2020.06.004
  33. S. Biswas, T. Rahaman, P. Gupta, R. Mitra, S. Dutta, E. Kharlyngdoh, S. Guha, J. Ganguly, A. Pal and M. Das, Biomass Bioenergy, 158, 106362 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2022.106362
  34. Y.H. Xu, X. Liu, X.L. Liu, J.L. Tan and H.L. Zhu, Carbohydr. Polym., 111, 955 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.05.029
  35. L. Wang, Q. Cui, S. Pan, Y. Li, Y. Jin, H. Yang, T. Li and Q. Zhang, Carbohydr. Polym. Technol. Appl., 2, 100172 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carpta.2021.100172
  36. R.G. Candido and A.R. Gonçalves, Ind. Crops Prod., 142, 111616 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111616
  37. M. Ilangovan, V. Guna, B. Prajwal, Q. Jiang and N. Reddy, Carbohydr. Polym., 236, 115996 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.115996
  38. T. Wang and Y. Zhao, Carbohydr. Polym., 253, 117225 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117225
  39. B. Shabanpour, M. Kazemi, S.M. Ojagh and P. Pourashouri, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 117, 742 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.05.038
  40. E. Sogut, Food Packag. Shelf Life, 23, 100430 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2019.100430
  41. P. Sukyai, P. Anongjanya, N. Bunyahwuthakul, N. Harnkarnsujarit, K. Kongsin, U. Sukatta, R. Sothornvit and R. Chollakup, Food Res. Int., 107, 528 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.02.052
  42. S. Acharya, Y. Hu, H. Moussa and N. Abidi, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 134, 44871 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1002/app.44871
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0