Issue

Vol. 35 No. 7 (2023): Vol 35 Issue 7 (2023)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Synthesis of Tartaric Acid based Polymer Nanocomposite Incorporated with Copper Oxide Nanoparticles with Antibacterial Activity

https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2023.27949
K. Subashini
Department of Chemistry, Applied Sciences, New Horizon College of Engineering, Bangalore-560103, India
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6842-7199
V. Sujatha
Department of Chemistry, Periyar University, Salem-636011, India Present address: DST-Mobility Fellow, Department of Chemistry, Pondicherry University, Puducherry-605014, India
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7663-7129
S. Prakash
Department of Chemistry, Periyar University, Salem-636011, India P.G. Department of Chemistry, Vivekanandha Arts and Science College for Women, Sankari-637303, India
https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3541-9635

Corresponding Author(s) : V. Sujatha

chemsujatha888@gmail.com

Asian Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 35 No. 7 (2023): Vol 35 Issue 7 (2023)

Abstract

The copper oxide nanoparticles were synthesized using Brassaia actinophylla (B. actinophylla) flower extract by solution combustion method. The poly(tartaric acid-co-diethylene glycol-co-acrylic acid (TDA) hydrogel was prepared using tartaric acid (T), diethylene glycol (D) and acrylic acid (A). The synthesized CuO nanoparticles were introduced into TDA hydrogel and the polymer nanocomposite TDA-CuO was obtained. The UV-peak was observed at 270 nm for TDA-CuO nanocomposite and for TDA no peak found. Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) peak obtained at 432 cm-1 confirmed the presence of CuO nanoparticles in the hydrogel. The nanoparticles size 25-35 nm was confirmed by transmission electron microscope (TEM) and the morphology was examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis. The percentage of copper and oxygen was analyzed by energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDAX) spectrum where the percentage of copper is 2.4%. The thermal stability of TDA and TDA-CuO hydrogel was confirmed by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The antibacterial activity was performed against two Gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis and two Gram-negative Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumonia bacterial strains at various concentrations 25, 50, 75 and 100 μL by agar well diffusion method. The Gram-positive bacterial strains showed highest antibacterial activity than Gram-negative bacterial strain at highest concentration 100 μg/mL.

Keywords

Nanoparticles Hydrogel Polymer composite Antibacterial activity
Subashini, K., Sujatha, V., & Prakash, S. (2023). Synthesis of Tartaric Acid based Polymer Nanocomposite Incorporated with Copper Oxide Nanoparticles with Antibacterial Activity. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 35(7), 1659–1664. https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2023.27949
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. D. Frank, C. Tyagi, L. Tomar, Y.E. Choonara, L.C. du Toit, P. Kumar, C. Penny and V. Pillay, Int. J. Nanomedicine, 9, 589 (2014); https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S50941
  2. P.P.N. Kumar, U. Shameem, P. Kollu, R.L. Kalyani and S.V.N. Pammi, Bionanoscience, 5, 135 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1007/s12668-015-0171-z
  3. Y. Wang, F.-A. Khan, M. Siddiqui, M. Aamer, C. Lu, Atta-Ur-Rahman, Atia-Tul-Wahab and M.I. Choudhary, J. Ethnopharmacol., 279, 113675 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2020.113675
  4. S. Banerjee, A. Das, P. Chakraborty, K. Suthindhiran and M.A. Jayasri, Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 17, 715 (2014); https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2014.715.719
  5. Y. Shi, D. Pu, X. Zhou and Y. Zhang, Foods, 11, 3408 (2022); https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11213408
  6. M.V. Hormaiztegui, M.I. Aranguren and V.L. Mucci, Eur. Polym. J., 102, 151 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2018.03.020
  7. E. Golestani, M. Javanbakht, H. Ghafarian-Zahmatkesh, H. Beydaghi and M. Ghaemi, Electrochim. Acta, 259, 903 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2017.10.123
  8. S. Ören, T. Çaykara, Ö. Kantoglu and O. Güven, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 78, 2219 (2000); https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4628(20001213)78:12<2219::AID-APP200>3.0.CO;2-X
  9. G. Chitra, D.S. Franklin, S. Sudarsan, M. Sakthivel and S. Guhanathan, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 95, 363 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.11.068
  10. X. Xu, J. Lin and P. Cen, Chin. J. Chem. Eng., 14, 419 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1016/S1004-9541(06)60094-3
  11. T. Plisko, K. Burts, A. Penkova, M. Dmitrenko, A. Kuzminova, S. Ermakov and A. Bildyukevich, Polymers, 15, 1664 (2023); https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15071664
  12. K.K. Ajekwene, Properties and Applications of Acrylates, IntechOpen (2020).
  13. J.E. Glass, J. Coatings Technology, 73, 79 (2001); https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02698434
  14. R. Brighenti, Y. Li and F.J. Vernerey, Front. Mater., 7, 196 (2020); https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2020.00196
  15. E. Kostansek, J. Coat. Technol. Res., 4, 375 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1007/s11998-007-9037-9
  16. R. Oliva, M.A. Ortenzi, A. Salvini, A. Papacchini and D. Giomi, RSC Adv., 7, 12054 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA00676D
  17. S. Lin-Gibson, S. Bencherif, J.A. Cooper, S.J. Wetzel, J.M. Antonucci, B.M. Vogel, F. Horkay and N.R. Washburn, Biomacromolecules, 5, 1280 (2004); https://doi.org/10.1021/bm0498777
  18. R.S. Tomar, I. Gupta, R. Singhal and A.K. Nagpal, Des. Monomers Polym., 10, 49 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1163/156855507779763685
  19. S. Fang, G. Wang, P. Li, R. Xing, S. Liu, Y. Qin, H. Yu, X. Chen and K. Li, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 115, 754 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.04.072
  20. D.S. Franklin and S. Guhanathan, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 132, (2015); https://doi.org/10.1002/app.41921
  21. S.J. Peighambardoust, S.H. Peighambardoust, N. Pournasir and P.M. Pakdel, Food Packag. Shelf Life, 22, 100420 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2019.100420
  22. S. Shankar, L.F. Wang and J.W. Rhim, Carbohydr. Polym., 169, 264 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.04.025
  23. F. Zhang, Z. Xu, S. Dong, L. Feng, A. Song, C.H. Tung and J. Hao, Soft Matter, 10, 4855 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1039/c4sm00479e
  24. Z.Q. Zhu, H.X. Sun, X.J. Qin, L. Jiang, C.J. Pei, L. Wang, Y.Q. Zeng, S.H. Wen, P.Q. La, A. Li and W.Q. Deng, J. Mater. Chem., 22, 4811 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1039/c2jm14210d
  25. Y. Ma, L. Lv, Y. Guo, Y. Fu, Q. Shao, T. Wu, S. Guo, K. Sun, X. Guo, E.K. Wujcik and Z. Guo, Polymer, 128, 12 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2017.09.009
  26. Y. Huang, M. Zeng, J. Ren, J. Wang, L. Fan and Q. Xu, Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp., 401, 97 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2012.03.031
  27. G. Kowalski, K. Kijowska, M. Witczak, L. Kuterasiñski and M. Lukasiewicz, Polymers, 11, 114 (2019); https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11010114
  28. A. Altinisik and K. Yurdakoc, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 122, 1556 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1002/app.34278
  29. K. Ghanbari and Z. Babaei, Anal. Biochem., 498, 37 (2016); mhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2016.01.006
  30. A. Lavin, R. Sivasamy, E. Mosquera and M.J. Morel, Surf. Interfaces, 17, 100367 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2019.100367
  31. S. Gandhi, R.H.H. Subramani, T. Ramakrishnan, A. Sivabalan, M.G. Nair, V. Dhanalakshmi and R. Anbarasan, J. Mater. Sci., 45, 1688 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-009-4158-4
  32. Z. Zhou, C. Lu, X. Wu and X. Zhang, RSC Adv., 3, 26066 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ra43006e
  33. M. Yadollahi, I. Gholamali, H. Namazi and M. Aghazadeh, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 73, 109 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.10.063
  34. R.J. Pinto, S. Daina, P. Sadocco, C.P. Neto and T. Trindade, BioMed Res. Int., 2013, 280512 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/280512
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download
AJC-35-7-15
Statistic
Read Counter : 1 Download : 1