Issue

Vol. 35 No. 6 (2023): Vol 35 Issue 6, 2023

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Fluid Hyperthermia and Ultrasonic Studies on Nickel Ferrite Magnetic Nanoparticles

https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2023.27577
V. Beula Shanthi Ammani Ammal
Department of Physics, Jerusalem College of Engineering, Narayanapuram, Chennai-600100, India
https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7682-0210
N. John Jebarathinam
Department of Chemistry, Jerusalem College of Engineering, Narayanapuram, Chennai-600100, India
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1590-8148

Corresponding Author(s) : N. John Jebarathinam

johnjebarathinamn@jerusalemengg.ac.in

Asian Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 35 No. 6 (2023): Vol 35 Issue 6, 2023

Abstract

Superparamagnetic nickel ferrite (NiFe2O4) nanoparticles were synthesized by low temperature hydrothermal method using EDTA as templating agent. The synthesized nanoparticles were characterized by FTIR, XRD, FESEM and TEM analysis. The XRD analysis shows the presence of cubic spinel phase with crystallite size of 26.42 nm. The morphology analyzed by FESEM and TEM techniques indicate the presence of cubical shape particles having average particle size of 28.44 nm with no agglomeration. The VSM analysis gives “S” shape curve with zero coercivity and saturation magnetization (Ms) of 30 emu/g indicating the presence of small magnetic particles exhibiting the superparamagnetic behaviour. Nickel ferrite nanofluids were prepared by mixing carrier fluid water with varying amounts of nickel ferrite nanopowder. Zeta potential measurements of dilute solution of nickel ferrite show the formation of stable nickel ferrite nanofluids. Hyperthermia and ultrasonic studies were carried out on various concentrations of nickel ferrite nanofluids. The SAR values and ultrasonic parameters were calculated. Less concentrated nickel ferrite nanofluids quickly attain threshold hyperthermia temperature of 43 °C when exposed to lower applied AC magnetic field of range 5 mT to 20 mT. Ultrasonic studies show at lower concentrations nickel nanoparticles interact with carrier fluid water through cohesive forces mainly hydrogen bonding and keep the particles in an isolated state there by continue to exhibit superparamagnetic characteristics. At higher concentrations, particle-particle interaction predominantly occurs leading to increase in particle size beyond 30 nm, so that the magnetic characteristics of nickel ferrite nanoparticles changes from superparamagnetic to ferromagnetic nature. At low concentrations induction heating occurs through Neel and Brownian relaxation mechanism whereas at high concentrations hysteresis loss mechanism operate to attain the threshold temperature of 43 ºC.

Keywords

Nanoparticles Superparamagnetic Hydrothermal Hyperthermia Nanofluids Ultrasonic velocity
Ammani Ammal, V. B. S., & Jebarathinam, N. J. (2023). Fluid Hyperthermia and Ultrasonic Studies on Nickel Ferrite Magnetic Nanoparticles. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 35(6), 1449–1457. https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2023.27577
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. M. Auffan, J. Rose, J.-Y. Bottero, G.V. Lowry, J.-P. Jolivet and M.R. Wiesner, Nat. Nanotechnol., 4, 634 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2009.242
  2. X. Gao, Y. Cui, R.M. Levenson, L.W.K. Chung and S. Nie, Nat. Biotechnol., 22, 969 (2004); https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt994
  3. M.E. Akerman, W.C.W. Chan, P. Laakkonen, S.N. Bhatia and E. Ruoslahti, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 99, 12617 (2002); https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.152463399
  4. S. Lanone and J. Boczkowski, Curr. Mol. Med., 6, 651 (2006); https://doi.org/10.2174/156652406778195026
  5. O. Hosu, M. Tertis and C. Cristea, Magnetochemistry, 5, 55 (2019); https://doi.org/10.3390/magnetochemistry5040055
  6. F. Schlachetzki, Y. Zhang, R.J. Boado and W.M. Pardridge, Neurology, 62, 1275 (2004); https://doi.org/10.1212/01.WNL.0000120551.38463.D9
  7. T.M. Allen and P.R. Cullis, Science, 303, 1818 (2004); https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1095833
  8. A.H. Faraji and P. Wipf, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 17, 2950 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2009.02.043
  9. J. Nicolas, S. Mura, D. Brambilla, N. Mackiewicz and P. Couvreur, Chem. Soc. Rev., 42, 1147 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1039/C2CS35265F
  10. A.E. John, N.W. Lukacs, A.A. Berlin, A. Palecanda, R.F. Bargatze, L.M. Stoolman and J.O. Nagy, FASEB J., 17, 2296 (2003); https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.03-0166fje
  11. M. Kumar, X. Kong, A.K. Behera, G.R. Hellermann, R.F. Lockey and S.S. Mohapatra, Genet. Vaccines Ther., 1, 3 (2003); https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-0556-1-3
  12. F.A. Jaffer and R. Weissleder, JAMA, 293, 855 (2005); https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.293.7.855
  13. D.L. Thorek, A.K. Chen, J. Czupryna and A. Tsourkas, Ann. Biomed. Eng., 34, 23 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-005-9002-7
  14. H. Lee, E. Lee, D.K. Kim, N.K. Jang, Y.Y. Jeong and S. Jon, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 128, 7383 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1021/ja061529k
  15. T.V. Sreekumar, A. Das, L. Chandra, A. Srivastava and B.K.U. Rao, J. Biomed. Nanotechnol., 5, 115 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1166/jbn.2009.040
  16. K.D. Miller, R.L. Siegel, C.C. Lin, A.B. Mariotto, J.L. Kramer, J.H. Rowland, K.D. Stein, R. Alteri and A. Jemal, CA Cancer J. Clin., 66, 271 (2016); https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21349
  17. Y. Du, L. Xia, A. Jo, R.M. Davis, P. Bissel, M.F. Ehrich and D.G.I. Kingston, Bioconjug. Chem., 29, 420 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.7b00756
  18. S. Kalimuthu, P. Gangadaran, R.L. Rajendran, L. Zhu, J.M. Oh, H.W. Lee, A. Gopal, S.H. Baek, S.Y. Jeong, S.-W. Lee, J. Lee and B.-C. Ahn, Front. Pharmacol., 9, 1116 (2018); https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.01116
  19. V.V. Gwenin, C.D. Gwenin and M. Kalaji, Langmuir, 27, 14300 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1021/la202951p
  20. I.M. Obaidat, B. Issa and Y. Haik, Nanomaterials, 5, 63 (2015); https://doi.org/10.3390/nano5010063
  21. E. Ahilandeswari, R. Rajesh Kanna and K. Sakthipandi, Physica B, 599, 412425 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2020.412425
  22. G. Rana, P. Dhiman, A. Kumar, D.-V.N. Vo, G. Sharma, S. Sharma and M. Naushad, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 175, 182 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2021.08.040
  23. P. Caetano, N. Simões, P. Pinto, L. Fernandez-Outon, A. Albuquerque, W. Macedo and J. Ardisson, J. Braz. Chem. Soc., 31, 2452 (2020); https://doi.org/10.21577/0103-5053.20200120
  24. K. Nejati and R. Zabihi, Chem. Cent. J., 6, 23 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-153X-6-23
  25. S. Bae, S.W. Lee and Y. Takemura, Appl. Phys. Lett., 89, 252503 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2420769
  26. M. Nabeel Rashin and J. Hemalatha, Ultrasonics, 52, 1024 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2012.08.005
  27. S. Chakraborty, J. Mukherjee, M. Manna, P. Ghosh, S. Das and M.B. Denys, Ultrason. Sonochem., 19, 1044 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2012.01.016
  28. I. Hilger, K. Fruhauf, W. Andra, R. Hiergeist, R. Hergt and W.A. Kaiser, Acad. Radiol., 9, 198 (2002); https://doi.org/10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80171-X
  29. N.J. Jebarathinam, M. Eswaramoorthy and V. Krishnasamy, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 67, 3334 (1994); https://doi.org/10.1246/bcsj.67.3334
  30. Y.C. Wang, J. Ding, J.H. Yin, B.H. Liu, J.B. Yi and S. Yu, J. Appl. Phys., 98, 124306 (2005); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2148632
  31. A. Lassoued, M.S. Lassoued, B. Dkhil, S. Ammar and A. Gadri, Physica E, 101, 212 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physe.2018.04.009
  32. X. Wang, X. Xu and S.U.S. Choi, J. Thermophys. Heat Trans., 13, 474 (1999); https://doi.org/10.2514/2.6486
  33. E.L. Verde, G.T. Landi, M.S. Carrião, A.L. Drummond, J.A. Gomes, E.D. Vieira, M.H. Sousa and A.F. Bakuzis, AIP Adv., 2, 032120 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4739533
  34. S. Larumbe, J.I. Pérez-Landazábal, J.M. Pastor and C. Gómez-Polo, J. Appl. Phys., 111, 103911 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4720079
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download
AJC-35-6-21
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0