Issue

Vol. 35 No. 5 (2023): Vol 35 Issue 5, 2023

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

CuO-Rice Starch Nanocomposites: Synthesis, Characterization and Antibacterial Properties

https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2023.27739
Jagdish Prasad
Department of Chemistry, H.S.B. Government PG College, Someshwar-263637, India
Vinod Kumar
Department of Chemistry, Uttarakhand Open University, Haldwani-263139, India
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0516-3656
Bhuwan Chandra
Department of Chemistry, Kumaun University, S.S.J. Campus, Almora-263601, India
Anshu Tamta
Department of Chemistry, Kumaun University, S.S.J. Campus, Almora-263601, India
Rashmi Khulbe
Rashmi Khulbe
N.D. Kandpal
Department of Chemistry, Kumaun University, S.S.J. Campus, Almora-263601, India

Corresponding Author(s) : Vinod Kumar

drvkumar85@gmail.com

Asian Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 35 No. 5 (2023): Vol 35 Issue 5, 2023

Abstract

In current study, the copper oxide-rice starch nanocomposites has been synthesized from the different salts of copper and rice starch. The synthesized nanocomposites were characterized by FT-IR, XRD, SEM, TGA and DSC spectroscopic methods. The spectroscopic analysis showed that the CuO-starch nanocomposite was formed and CuO nanoparticles (CuONPs) were uniformly dispersed in the starch network with relatively smooth surfaces in the CuO-starch nanocomposite. The average crystalline size of CuO-starch nanocomposites from different precursors viz. copper acetate, copper chloride and equimolar mixture of copper acetate and copper chloride were calculated as 3.13 nm, 6.46 nm and 17.42 nm, respectively, while average particle size were 1421, 1504 and 1796 nm, respectively. The TGA and DSC data showed that the CuO-starch nanocomposites were thermally stable. The nanocomposites were scrutinized by antibacterial activity against two tested bacterial strain Serratia marcescens (17.67 ± 0.90 mm) and Escherichia coli (16.3 ± 0.30). It was concluded that, CuO-starch nanocomposites were thermally stable and exhibited significant antibacterial activity.

Keywords

Copper oxide Rice-starch CuO-starch nanocomposites Antibacterial activity
Prasad, J., Kumar, V., Chandra, B., Tamta, A., Khulbe, R., & Kandpal, N. (2023). CuO-Rice Starch Nanocomposites: Synthesis, Characterization and Antibacterial Properties. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 35(5), 1169–1177. https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2023.27739
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. A. Ujcic, S. Krejcikova, M. Nevoralova, A. Zhigunov, J. Dybal, Z. Krulis, P. Fulin, O. Nyc and M. Slouf, Front. Mater., 7, 9 (2020); https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2020.00009
  2. S. Liu, X. Li, L. Chen, L. Li, B. Li and J. Zhu, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 104, 1330 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.05.174
  3. T. Jiang, Q. Duan, J. Zhu, H. Liu and L. Yu, Adv. Ind. Eng. Polym. Res., 3, 8 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiepr.2019.11.003
  4. C.I. Idumah and C.M. Obele, Surfaces Interfaces, 22, 100879 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2020.100879
  5. A.M. Nafchi, A.K. Alias, S. Mahmud and M. Robal, J. Food Eng., 113, 511 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2012.07.017
  6. M.B. Gawande, A. Goswami, F.X. Felpin, T. Asefa, X. Huang, R. Silva, X. Zou, R. Zboril and R.S. Varma, Chem. Rev., 116, 3722 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00482
  7. S. Saran, G. Sharma, M. Kumar and M.I. Ali, Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Res., 8, 3887 (2017); https://doi.org/10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.8(9).3887-92
  8. G. Sharma, N.D. Jasuja, M. Kumar and M.I. Ali, J. Nanotechnol., 2015, 132675 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/132675
  9. A.K. Chatterjee, R.K. Sarkar, A.P. Chattopadhyay, R. Chakraborty, P. Aich and T. Basu, Nanotechnology, 23, 085103 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/23/8/085103
  10. S.V.P. Ramaswamy, S. Narendhran and R. Sivaraj, Bull. Mater. Sci., 39, 361 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-016-1173-3
  11. J. Chen, B. Karmakar, M.A. Salem, A.Y. Alzahrani, M.Z. Bani-Fwaz, M.M. Abdel-Daim and A.F. El-Kott, Arab. J. Chem., 15, 103681 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2021.103681
  12. V.C. Verma, A. Kumar, M.G.H. Zaidi, A.K. Verma, J.P. Jaiswal, D.K. Singh, A. Singh and S. Agrawal, Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci., 7, 211 (2018);
  13. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.710.022
  14. J. Ma, W. Zhu, Y. Tian and Z. Wang, Nanoscale Res. Lett., 11, 200 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-016-1404-y
  15. K. Dasila and M. Singh, S. Afr. J. Bot., 145, 177 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2021.07.020
  16. I. Govindaraju, G.Y. Zhuo, I. Chakraborty, S.K. Melanthota, S.S. Mal, B. Sarmah, V.J. Baruah, K.K. Mahato and N. Mazumder, Food Hydrocoll., 122, 107093 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.107093
  17. A. Musa, K. Hakan, K. Suuml leyman and S.K. Derya, Afr. J. Biotechnol., 10, 2867 (2011); https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB10.1567
  18. P.V. Kowsik and N. Mazumder, Microsc. Res. Tech., 81, 1533 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.23160
  19. J.M. Fang, P.A. Fowler, J. Tomkinson and C.A.S. Hill, Carbohydr, Polym., 47, 245 (2002); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8617(01)00187-4
  20. R. Kizil, J. Irudayaraj and K. Seetharaman, J. Agric. Food Chem., 50, 3912 (2002); https://doi.org/10.1021/jf011652p
  21. A. Lopez-Rubio, J.M. Clarke, Ben Scherer, D.L. Topping and E.P. Gilbert, Food Hydrocoll., 23, 1940 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2009.01.003
  22. D. Fan, W. Ma, L. Wang, J. Huang, J. Zhao, H. Zhang and W. Chen, Stärke, 64, 598 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1002/star.201100200
  23. A. Hebeish, M.H. El-Rafie, M.A. El-Sheikh and M.E. El-Naggar, J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater., 24, 515 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10904-013-0004-x
  24. M. Kacurakova and M. Mathlouthi, Carbohydr. Res., 284, 145 (1996); https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6215(95)00412-2
  25. M. Ahmad, A. Gani, I. Hassan, Q. Huang and H. Shabbir, Sci. Rep., 10, 3533 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60380-0
  26. T.Y. Liu, Y. Ma, S.F. Yu, J. Shi and S. Xue, Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol., 12, 586 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2011.06.009
  27. K. Piyada, S. Waranyou and W. Thawien, Int. Food Res. J., 20, 439 (2013).
  28. W.-T. Yao, S.-H. Yu, Y. Zhou, J. Jiang, Q.-S. Wu, L. Zhang and J. Jiang, J. Phys. Chem. B, 109, 14011 (2005); https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0517605
  29. J. Prasad, V. Kumar, B. Chandra and N.D. Kandpal, Rasayan J. Chem., 15, 72 (2022); https://doi.org/10.31788/RJC.2022.1516579
  30. B. Schafer, M. Hecht, J. Harting and H. Nirschl, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 349, 186 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2010.05.025
  31. S. Estevez-Areco, L. Guz, R. Candal and S. Goyanes, Food Hydrocoll., 108, 106054 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.106054
  32. K. Charoensri, C. Rodwihok, D. Wongratanaphisan, J.A. Ko, J.S. Chung and H.J. Park, Polymers, 13, 425 (2021); https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13030425
  33. A. Ananth, S. Dharaneedharan, M.S. Heo and Y.S. Mok, Chem. Eng. J., 262, 179 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.09.083
  34. O. Mahapatra, M. Bhagat, C. Gopalakrishnan and K.D. Arunachalam, J. Exp. Nanosci., 3, 185 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1080/17458080802395460
  35. A. Azam, A.S. Ahmed, M. Oves, M.S. Khan, S.S. Habib and A. Memic, Int. J. Nanomedicine, 7, 6003 (2011); https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S35347
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download
AJC-35-5-17
Statistic
Read Counter : 1 Download : 1