Issue

Vol. 35 No. 5 (2023): Vol 35 Issue 5, 2023

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Response Surface Methodology (RSM) Approach for Optimization of Parameters for Synthesis of Organic Compounds and Evaluation of Biological Activity with Molecular Docking

https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2023.27593
Vikas D. Jadhav
Department of Chemistry, KRT Arts, BH Commerce and AM Science (KTHM) College, Nashik-422002, India
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9446-5671
Vishwas B. Gaikwad
Department of Chemistry, KRT Arts, BH Commerce and AM Science (KTHM) College, Nashik-422002, India
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1292-529X
Ghanshyam B. Jadhav
Department of Pharmacology, Maratha Vidya Prasarak Samaj’s College of Pharmacy, Nashik-422002, India
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7677-1141
Ganesh S. Phad
Department of Statistics, KRT Arts, BH Commerce and AM Science (KTHM) College, Nashik-422002, India
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0409-9266
Pritam A. Shete
Department of Chemistry, RNC Arts, JDB Commerce and NSC Science College, Nashik Road, Nashik-422101, India
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7388-7912
Vikesh V. Kukade
Delonix Society Baramati College of Pharmacy, Baramati-413133, India
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4858-9550
Digambar B. Uphade
Department of Statistics, KRT Arts, BH Commerce and AM Science (KTHM) College, Nashik-422002, India
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2510-0860

Corresponding Author(s) : Ganesh S. Phad

ganeshphad@kthmcollege.ac.in

Asian Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 35 No. 5 (2023): Vol 35 Issue 5, 2023

Abstract

The triazolidine derivatives were synthesized by green and sustainable chemistry approach. The response surface methodology (RSM) was applied to optimize the reaction parameters during the synthesis. Reaction parameter which affect the yield of product were studied, which includes the temperature and time of the reaction. Various statistical RSM with different central composite designs (CCD) such as circumscribed (CCC), face-centered (CCF) and inscribed (CCI) were used to find the maximum yield of the product (%) of reaction at the given parameters and selected, which gave the maximum possible yield. The relationship between reaction parameters (temperature and time) and the yield of product modeled using second-order response surface model. The optimum reaction parameters given by CCI were 80.8 ºC reaction temperature and 15.03 min reaction time with yield of product is up to 94.57%. The adequacy and reliability of the predicted model was checked by ANOVA, R-square and adjusted R-square and revealed the good agreement between predicted model and actual experimental data. The study described here can be efficiently applied for the optimization of parameters in the synthesis of any organic compound. The molecular docking was carried out by using AutoDock vina 1.2.0 on (CYP51) [PDBID: 1EA1] and (DprE1) [PDBID: 4FDO] for target anti-tuberculosis activity while (FabH) [PDBID: 1HNJ] for target antimicrobial activity. There was better interaction within receptor amino acids compound 3d and 3b with FabH and CYP51 enzyme, respectively for anti-tuberculosis activity and compound 3d with DprE1 enzyme for antimicrobial activity observed very good docking score among all compounds.

Keywords

Triazolidine derivatives Response surface methodology Green chemistry approach Green solvents Molecular docking
Jadhav, V. D., Gaikwad, V. B., Jadhav, G. B., Phad, G. S., Shete, P. A., Kukade, V. V., & Uphade, D. B. (2023). Response Surface Methodology (RSM) Approach for Optimization of Parameters for Synthesis of Organic Compounds and Evaluation of Biological Activity with Molecular Docking. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 35(5), 1153–1160. https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2023.27593
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. R. Ramesh and A. Lalitha, ChemistrySelect, 1, 2085 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.201600348
  2. V. Moodley, S. Maddila, S.B. Jonnalagadda and W.E. van Zyl, New J. Chem., 41, 6455 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1039/C7NJ00855D
  3. A.K. Singh and K.R. Kandel, J. Nepal Chem. Soc., 30, 174 (2013); https://doi.org/10.3126/jncs.v30i0.9391
  4. K.T. Potts, Chem. Rev., 61, 87 (1961); https://doi.org/10.1021/cr60210a001
  5. B.S. Patil, G. Krishnamurthy, H.S. Bhojya Naik, P.R. Latthe and M. Ghate, Eur. J. Med. Chem., 45, 3329 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2010.04.016
  6. H. Bayrak, A. Demirbas, N. Demirbas and S.A. Karaoglu, Eur. J. Med. Chem., 44, 4362 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2009.05.022
  7. B. Soni, M.S. Ranawat, R. Sharma, A. Bhandari and S. Sharma, Eur. J. Med. Chem., 45, 2938 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2010.03.019
  8. B.S. Patil, G. Krishnamurthy, N.D. Shashikumar, M.R. Lokesh and H.S.B. Naik, J. Chem., 2013, 462594 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/462594
  9. J. Xu, Y. Cao, J. Zhang, S. Yu, Y. Zou, X. Chai, Q. Wu, D. Zhang, Y. Jiang and Q. Sun, Eur. J. Med. Chem., 46, 3142 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2011.02.042
  10. B. Tozkoparan, E. Küpeli, E. Yesilada and M. Ertan, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 15, 1808 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2006.11.029
  11. B. Shivarama Holla, B. Veerendra, M.K. Shivananda and B. Poojary, Eur. J. Med. Chem., 38, 759 (2003); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0223-5234(03)00128-4
  12. J. Ghanaat, M.A. Khalilzadeh and D. Zareyee, Mol. Divers., 25, 223 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1007/s11030-020-10050-0
  13. A. Duran, H.N. Dogan and S. Rollas, Farmaco, 57, 559 (2002); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-827X(02)01248-X
  14. M.T. Abdel-Aal, W.A. El-Sayed, S.M. El-Kosy and E.S.H. El-Ashry, Arch. Pharm., 341, 307 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1002/ardp.200700154
  15. A.A. Aly, A. A. Hassan, M.M. Makhlouf and S. Bräse, Molecules, 25, 3036 (2020); https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25133036
  16. I. Kucukguzel, S.G. Kucukguzel, S. Rollas and M. Kiraz, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 11, 1703 (2001); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-894X(01)00283-9
  17. A. Foroumadi, Z. Kiani and F. Soltani, Il Farmaco, 58, 1073 (2003); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-827X(03)00158-7
  18. F. Shaikh, S.L. Shastri, N.S. Naik, R. Kulkarni, J.M. Madar, L.A. Shastri, S.D. Joshi and V. Sunagar, ChemistrySelect, 4, 105 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.201802395
  19. M.H. Shaikh, D.D. Subhedar, L. Nawale, D. Sarkar, F.A. Kalam Khan, J.N. Sangshetti and B.B. Shingate, MedChemComm, 6, 1104 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1039/C5MD00057B
  20. P. Sabale, L. Potey, P. Rahangdale and V. Sabale, Pharm. Lett., 11, 51 (2019).
  21. R.S. Keri, S.A. Patil, S. Budagumpi and B.M. Nagaraja, Chem. Biol. Drug Des., 86, 410 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1111/cbdd.12527
  22. S. Zhang, Z. Xu, C. Gao, Q.-C. Ren, L. Chang, Z.-S. Lv and L.-S. Feng, Eur. J. Med. Chem., 138, 501 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2017.06.051
  23. L. Labanauskas, E. Udrenaite, P. Gaidelis and A. Brukstus, Il Farmaco, 59, 255 (2004); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.farmac.2003.11.002
  24. S.J. Gilani, S.A. Khan and N. Siddiqui, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 20, 4762 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2010.06.125
  25. A. Almasirad, S.A. Tabatabai, M. Faizi, A. Kebriaeezadeh, N. Mehrabi, A. Dalvandi and A. Shafiee, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 14, 6057 (2004); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2004.09.072
  26. I. Küçükgüzel, S. Güniz Küçükgüzel, S. Rollas, G. Ötük-Sanis, O. Özdemir, I. Bayrak, T. Altug and J.P. Stables, Farmaco, 59, 893 (2004); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.farmac.2004.07.005
  27. A. Varvaresou, T. Siatra-Papastaikoudi, A. Tsotinis, A. Tsantili-Kakoulidou and A. Vamvakides, Il Farmaco, 53, 320 (1998); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-827X(98)00024-X
  28. P.G. Mahajan, N.C. Dige, B.D. Vanjare, H. Raza, M. Hassan, S.-Y. Seo, C.-H. Kim and K.H. Lee, Mol. Divers., 24, 1185 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1007/s11030-019-09983-y
  29. A.M. Othman, M.A. Elsayed, A.M. Elshafei and M.M. Hassan, J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol., 15, 497 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgeb.2017.08.003
  30. W.E. Prasetyo, T. Kusumaningsih and M. Firdaus, Synth. Commun., 49, 3352 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1080/00397911.2019.1666282
  31. M. Ghaffari-Moghaddam, Z. Yekke-Ghasemi, M. Khajeh, M. Rakhshanipour, Y. Yasin, Russ. J. Bioorg. Chem., 40, 252 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1134/S1068162014030054
  32. F. Lamberti, C. Mazzariol, F. Spolaore, R. Ceccato, L. Salmaso and S. Gross, Sustain. Chem., 3, 114 (2022); https://doi.org/10.3390/suschem3010009
  33. D. Priya, C. Lakshman and S.M. Roopan, Mol. Divers, 26, 691 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1007/s11030-020-10175-2
  34. P.M. Murray, F. Bellany, L. Benhamou, D.-K. Bucar, A.B. Tabor and T.D. Sheppard, Org. Biomol. Chem., 14, 2373 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1039/C5OB01892G
  35. I.M. Fukuda, C.F.F. Pinto, C. dos Santos-Moreira, A.M. Saviano and F.R. Lourenço, Brazilian J. Pharm. Sci., 54, e01006 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1590/s2175-97902018000001006
  36. C.J. Taylor, A. Pomberger, K.C. Felton, R. Grainger, M. Barecka, T.W. Chamberlain, R.A. Bourne, C.N. Johnson and A.A. Lapkin, Chem. Rev., 123, 3089 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00798
  37. C.-Y. Lai and J.E. Cronan, J. Biol. Chem., 278, 51494 (2003); https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M308638200
  38. O.A. Adesina, F. Abdulkareem, A.S. Yusuff and M. Lala, S. Afr. J. Chem. Eng., 28, 46 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajce.2019.02.002
  39. Y. El-Malah, S. Nazzal and N.M. Khanfar, Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm., 32, 1207 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1080/03639040600685167
  40. M. Amini, H. Younesi, N. Bahramifar, A.A.Z. Lorestani, F. Ghorbani, A. Daneshi and M. Sharifzadeh, J. Hazard. Mater., 154, 694 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.10.114
  41. M. Bagheban, A. Mohammadi, M. Baghdadi, M. Janmohammadi and M. Salimi, J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng., 17, 827 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1007/s40201-019-00399-2
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download
AJC-35-5-15
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0