Issue

Vol. 35 No. 12 (2023): Vol 35 Issue 12, 2023

Copyright (c) 2023 Arti Jangra, Ramesh Kumar, Jai Kumar, Jaiveer Singh

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Adsorption of Antibiotic Drug on the Surface of Humic Acid Modified Magnetite Nanoparticles: Kinetics, Isotherm and Thermodynamic Studies

https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2023.30254
Arti Jangra
Department of Chemistry, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra-136119, India
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4113-3451
Ramesh Kumar
Department of Chemistry, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra-136119, India
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2089-2213
Jai Kumar
Department of Chemistry, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra-136119, India
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2556-6345
Jaiveer Singh
Department of Chemistry, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra-136119, India
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8965-6919

Corresponding Author(s) : Ramesh Kumar

rameshkumarkuk@gmail.com

Asian Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 35 No. 12 (2023): Vol 35 Issue 12, 2023

Abstract

The present study reports the synthesis of humic acid-modified magnetite nanoparticles for adsorption behaviour towards the ofloxacin drug. Several analytical and spectroscopic techniques were used to characterize the synthesized surface modified magnetite nanoparticles. In order to determine the highest possible adsorption capacity of these coated nanoparticles, the effects of various influencing variables such as pH of the solution, contact time, initial concentration of adsorbate solution, amount of adsorbent and temperature were also investigated using batch adsorption method. Adsorption isotherm and kinetic analysis for the adsorption of ofloxacin drug from aqueous solution were studied simultaneously. The kinetics and isotherm studies demonstrated good agreement with the pseudo-second-order kinetics model and Langmuir model of isotherm, respectively. Thermodynamic analysis of the adsorption of ofloxacin on the surface of humic acid modified magnetite nanoparticles displayed negative values of Gibb’s free energy change, positive values of enthalpy as well as entropy change, resulting that the adsorption process was spontaneous and endothermic in nature. A comparative study of percentage drug removal efficiency of humic acid functionalized magnetite nanoparticles with the reported adsorbents has also been reported. This study revealed that the humic acid-modified magnetite nanoparticles showed remarkable adsorption capacity and thus could be used as an effective adsorbent for the removal of ofloxacin from aqueous solution.

Keywords

Adsorption Humic acid Magnetite nanoparticles Ofloxacin
Jangra, A., Kumar, R., Kumar, J., & Singh, J. (2023). Adsorption of Antibiotic Drug on the Surface of Humic Acid Modified Magnetite Nanoparticles: Kinetics, Isotherm and Thermodynamic Studies. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 35(12), 2939–2947. https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2023.30254
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. D. Fatta-Kassinos, S. Meric and A. Nikolaou, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 399, 251 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-010-4300-9
  2. M. Bilal, S. Mehmood, T. Rasheed and H.M.N. Iqbal, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sci. Health, 13, 68 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2019.11.005
  3. T. Mackulak, S. Cernanský, M. Fehér, L. Birošová and M. Gál, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sci. Health, 9, 40 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2019.04.002
  4. B. Ebrahimpour, Y. Yamini and M. Moradi, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 66, 264 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2012.03.028
  5. H. Titouhi and J.E. Belgaied, J. Environ. Sci., 45, 84 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2015.12.017
  6. M. Mezzelani, S. Gorbi and F. Regoli, Mar. Environ. Res., 140, 41 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2018.05.001
  7. X. Zhang, J. Li, S. Yan, R.D. Tyagi and J. Chen, Physical, Chemical, and Biological Impact (Hazard) of Hospital Wastewater on Environ-ment: Presence of Pharmaceuticals, Pathogens and Antibiotic-resistance Genes; In: Current Developments in Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Elsevier, pp. 79–102 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819722-6.00003-1
  8. A. Khadir, A. Mollahosseini, R.M.A. Tehrani and M. Negarestani, A Review on Pharmaceutical Removal from Aquatic Media by Adsorption: Understanding the Influential Parameters and Novel Adsorbents, In: Sustainable Green Chemical Processes and their Allied Applications. Nanotechnology in the Life Sciences, eds.: A. Inamuddin, Springer, Cham., Nanotechnol. Life Sci., 207 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42284-4_8
  9. H. Farzaneh, K. Loganathan, J. Saththasivam and G. McKay, Sci. Total Environ., 765, 142704 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142704
  10. A. Javaid, S. Latif, M. Imran, N. Hussain, M.S.R. Rajoka, H.M.N. Iqbal and M. Bilal, Chemosphere, 291, 133056 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133056
  11. H. Wu, Y. Shi, X. Guo, S. Zhao, J. Du, H. Jia, L. He and L. Du, J. Sep. Sci., 39, 4398 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.201600631
  12. Z. Li, H. Hong, L. Liao, C.J. Ackley, L.A. Schulz, R.A. MacDonald, A.L. Mihelich and S.M. Emard, Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces, 88, 339 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2011.07.011
  13. P. Kundu, A. Kaur, S.K. Mehta and S.K. Kansal, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol., 14, 6991 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2014.9238
  14. M.E. Peñafiel, J.M. Matesanz, E. Vanegas, D. Bermejo, R. Mosteo and M.P. Ormad, Sci. Total Environ., 750, 141498 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141498
  15. S.H. Huang and R.S. Juang, J. Nanopart. Res., 13, 4411 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-011-0551-4
  16. N. Elahi and M. Rizwan, Artif. Organs, 45, 1272 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.14027
  17. A. Parashar, S. Sikarwar and R. Jain, Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem., 102, 117 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2020.1716977
  18. A. Jangra, J. Singh, J. Kumar, K. Rani and R. Kumar, Indian J. Biochem. Biophys., 59, 892 (2022); https://doi.org/10.56042/ijbb.v59i9.59916
  19. A. Jangra, J. Singh, R. Khanna, P. Kumar, S. Kumar and R. Kumar, Asian J. Chem., 33, 3031 (2021); https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2021.23471
  20. A. Jangra, J. Kumar, D. Singh, H. Kumar, P. Kumar, S. Kumar and R. Kumar, Water Sci. Technol., 86, 3028 (2022); https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2022.379
  21. A. Jangra, S. Kumar, J. Singh, J. Kumar, K. Rani, P. Kumar, D. Singh and R. Kumar, Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem., 13, 1 (2023); https://doi.org/10.33263/BRIAC135.480
  22. N. Ghosh, S. Sen, G. Biswas, A. Saxena and P.K. Haldar, Water Air Soil Pollut., 234, 202 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-023-06217-8
  23. F. Golmohammadi, M. Hazrati and M. Safari, Microchem. J., 144, 64 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2018.08.057
  24. I. Langmuir, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 40, 1361 (1918); https://doi.org/10.1021/ja02242a004
  25. X. Weng, W. Cai, G. Owens and Z. Chen, J. Clean. Prod., 319, 128734 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128734
  26. H. Freundlich, Z. Phys. Chem., 57U, 385 (1907); https://doi.org/10.1515/zpch-1907-5723
  27. A.V. Samrot, H.H. Ali, J. Selvarani A, E. Faradjeva, R. P, P. P and S. Kumar S, Curr. Res. Green Sustain. Chem., 4, 100066 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crgsc.2021.100066
  28. V. Temkin and M.J. Pyzhev, Acta Physicochim. URSS, 12, 217 (1940).
  29. K.L. Tan and B.H. Hameed, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng., 74, 25 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2017.01.024
  30. S. Lagergren, Kungliga Svenska Vetenskap. Handlingar, 24, 1 (1898).
  31. Y.S. Ho and G. McKay, Process Biochem., 34, 451 (1999); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-9592(98)00112-5
  32. Z. Jeirani, C.H. Niu and J. Soltan, Rev. Chem. Eng., 33, 491 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1515/revce-2016-0027
  33. L.E. Vîjan, Optoelectron. Adv. Mater. Rapid Commun., 3, 60 (2009).
  34. J. Singh, A. Jangra, K. Rani, P. Kumar, S. Kumar and R. Kumar, Asian J. Chem., 33, 2675 (2021); https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2021.23377
  35. A.H. Birniwa, A.S. Abubakar, H.N.M.E. Mahmud, S.R.M. Kutty, A.H. Jagaba, S.S. Abdullahi and Z.U. Zango, Application of Agricultural Wastes for Cationic Dyes Removal from Wastewater, In: Textile Waste-water Treatment. Sustainable Textiles: Production, Processing, Manufacturing & Chemistry, S.S. Muthu and A. Khadir, Eds. Springer: Singapore, pp. 239-274 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2832-1_9
  36. M.C. Ncibi and M. Sillanpää, J. Hazard. Mater., 298, 102 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.05.025
  37. A.M. Aljeboree and A.F. Alkaim, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 1294, 052059 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1294/5/052059
  38. A. Thakur, N. Sharma and A. Mann, Mater. Today Proc., 28, 1514 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.833
  39. S.A. Hassan and F.J. Ali, Int. J. Adv. Sci. Technol. Res., 2, 950 (2014).
  40. A. Jaswal, M. Kaur, S. Singh, S.K. Kansal, A. Umar, C.S. Garoufalis and S. Baskoutas, J. Hazard. Mater., 417, 125982 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125982
  41. P. Tavassoli, E. Bazrafshan, F.K. Mostafapour, Z. Maghsoodi, D. Balarak, H. Kamani and A.A. Zarei, J. Mazandaran Univ. Med. Sci., 27, 116 (2018) (In Persian).
  42. R.A. Wuana, R. Sha’Ato and S. Iorhen, Adv. Environ. Res., 4, 49 (2015); https://doi.org/10.12989/aer.2015.4.1.049
  43. J. Zhao, G. Liang, X. Zhang, X. Cai, R. Li, X. Xie and Z. Wang, Sci. Total Environ., 688, 1205 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.287
  44. S.T. Danalioglu, S.S. Bayazit, Ö. Kerkez, B.G. Alhogbi and M. Abdel Salam, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 123, 259 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2017.05.018
  45. M.Z. Afzal, R. Yue, X.F. Sun, C. Song and S.G. Wang, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 543, 76 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2019.01.083
  46. C. Yan, L. Fan, Y. Chen and Y. Xiong, Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp., 602, 125135 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.125135
  47. D. Xie, H. Zhang, M. Jiang, H. Huang, H. Zhang, Y. Liao and S. Zhao, Chin. J. Chem. Eng., 28, 2689 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2020.06.039
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0