Issue

Vol. 35 No. 11 (2023): Vol 35 Issue 11, 2023

Copyright (c) 2023 Prasong Srihanam, Yodthong Baimark, Ansaya Thonpho, Suchai Tanisood

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Cellulose-Silk Fibroin Composite Particles for Hydrophilic Drug-Controlled Release System: Preparation and Characterization

Cellulose-silk fibroin composite particles
https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2023.29582
P. Srihanam
The Center of Excellence in Chemistry (PERCH-CIC) and Biodegradable Polymers Research Unit, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Mahasarakham University, Maha Sarakham 44150, Thailand
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4098-7148
Y. Baimark
The Center of Excellence in Chemistry (PERCH-CIC) and Biodegradable Polymers Research Unit, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Mahasarakham University, Maha Sarakham 44150, Thailand
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8432-8721
A. Thonpho
The Center of Excellence in Chemistry (PERCH-CIC) and Biodegradable Polymers Research Unit, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Mahasarakham University, Maha Sarakham 44150, Thailand
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7389-7814
S. Tanisood
The Center of Excellence in Chemistry (PERCH-CIC) and Biodegradable Polymers Research Unit, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Mahasarakham University, Maha Sarakham 44150, Thailand
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0323-6708

Corresponding Author(s) : S. Tanisood

Suchai.t@msu.ac.th

Asian Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 35 No. 11 (2023): Vol 35 Issue 11, 2023

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the dissolution of cellulose (C) powder as a potential material for particle formation when combined with a silk fibroin (SF) solution. Each polymer solution as well as a mixture of cellulose and silk fibroin in different ratios were prepared into particles using the solvent emulsion-diffusion method. The particle morphology was characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and by attenuated reflection Fourier-transformed infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) and thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA) for the C-SF molecular interaction and thermal properties, respectively. The results showed that the cellulose particles appeared as separate fibers and loosely bound together, while silk fibroin particles were spherical in shape with dense texture and smooth surface. The C/SF mixed particles with different ratios could be formed into spherical particles and a ratio of 1:3 has the most spherical and solid. The ATR-FTIR results indicated the absorption spectra of the main functional groups both cellulose and silk fibroin. Blue dextran helped to enhance the temperature of the maximum decomposition rate (Td,max) of the particles via hydrogen bond interaction between the blue dextran and polymers. A burst release of blue dextran was observed in the first 12 h due to the swelling of particle surfaces and the slowest release found in the silk fibroin particles. The C/SF composite showed different blue dextran- eleased profiles and the particle with a high content of silk fibroin-released blue dextran in slowly rate. The results of this work can be used as a basis for applying C/SF composite particles in a hydrophilic drug release-controlled system.

Keywords

Cellulose Silk fibroin Property Blue dextran Drug-controlled release system
Srihanam, P., Baimark, Y., Thonpho, A., & Tanisood, S. (2023). Cellulose-Silk Fibroin Composite Particles for Hydrophilic Drug-Controlled Release System: Preparation and Characterization: Cellulose-silk fibroin composite particles . Asian Journal of Chemistry, 35(11), 2677–2682. https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2023.29582
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. X. Ma, Y. Liu, L. Fan and W. Yan, Carbohydr. Polym., 252, 117169 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117169
  2. M. Saifullah, M.R.I. Shishir, R. Ferdowsi, M.R. Tanver Rahman and Q. Van Vuong, Trends Food Sci. Technol., 86, 230 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.02.030
  3. C.C. Berton-Carabin and K. Schroën, Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol., 6, 263 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-food-081114-110822
  4. T. Nicolai and B. Murray, Food Hydrocoll., 68, 157 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.08.036
  5. A. Sakar and E. Dickinson, Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci., 49, 69 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cocis.2020.04.004
  6. Y. Wang, X. Li, T. Li, Y. Wang, J. Jiang, X. Zhang, J. Huang, B. Xia, H.C. Shum, Z. Yang and W. Dong, Food Hydrocoll., 134, 108055 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2022.108055
  7. J. Xiao, Y. Li and Q. Huang, Trends Food Sci. Technol., 55, 48 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2016.05.010
  8. X. Li and R. de Vries, Curr. Opin. Food Sci., 21, 51 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2018.05.012
  9. E.F. Ribeiro, P. Morell, V.R. Nicoletti, A. Quiles and I. Hernando, Food Hydrocoll., 119, 106839 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.106839
  10. J. Feng, C.C. Berton-Carabin, V. Fogliano and K. Schroën, Trends Food Sci. Technol., 121, 129 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2022.02.008
  11. J. Buchert, D. Ercili Cura, H. Ma, C. Gasparetti, E. Monogioudi, G. Faccio, M. Mattinen, H. Boer, R. Partanen, E. Selinheimo, R. Lantto and K. Kruus, Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol., 1, 113 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.food.080708.100841
  12. M. El Achaby, Z. Kassab, A. Barakat and A. Aboulkas, Ind. Crops Prod., 112, 499 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.12.049
  13. A. Takegawa, M. Murakami, Y. Kaneko and J. Kadokawa, Carbohydr. Polym., 79, 85 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.07.030
  14. K.L. Pickering, M.G.A. Efendy and T.M. Le, Compos., Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf., 83, 98 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.038
  15. S. Wang, A. Lu and L. Zhang, Prog. Polym. Sci., 53, 169 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2015.07.003
  16. A. Rajeswari, E.J.S. Christy, E. Swathi and A. Pius, J. Environ. Chem. Ecotoxicol, 2, 107 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enceco.2020.07.003
  17. S.J. Eichhorn, A. Etale, J. Wang, L.A. Berglund, Y. Li, Y. Cai, C. Chen, E.D. Cranston, M.A. Johns, Z. Fang, G. Li, L. Hu, M. Khandelwal, K.-Y. Lee, K. Oksman, S. Pinitsoontorn, F. Quero, A. Sebastian, M.M. Titirici, Z. Xu, S. Vignolini and B. Frka-Petesic, J. Mater. Sci., 57, 5697 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-022-06903-8
  18. B. Peng, Z. Yao, X. Wang, M. Crombeen, D.G. Sweeney and K.C. Tam, Energy Environ., 5, 37 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gee.2019.09.003
  19. D. Zhao, J. Huang, Y. Zhong, K. Li, L. Zhang and J. Cai, Adv. Funct. Mater., 26, 6279 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201601645
  20. N. Song, D. Jiao, S. Cui, X. Hou, P. Ding and L. Shi, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 9, 2924 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b11979
  21. E. Kontturi, P. Laaksonen, M.B. Linder, Nonappa, A.H. Gröschel, O.J. Rojas and O. Ikkala, Adv. Mater., 30, 1703779 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201703779
  22. X. Zhang, F. Lin, Q. Yuan, L. Zhu, C. Wang and S. Yang, Carbohydr. Polym., 215, 58 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.03.066
  23. H. Sadeghifar, R. Venditti, J. Jur, R.E. Gorga and J.J. Pawlak, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 5, 625 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b02003
  24. S. Lopes, C. Afonso, I. Fernandes, M.-F. Barreiro, P. Costa and A.E. Rodrigues, Ind. Crops Prod., 139, 111407 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.05.057
  25. M.A. Rabbi, M.M. Rahman, H. Minami, M.R. Habib and H. Ahmad, Carbohydr. Polym., 233, 115842 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.115842
  26. A.E. Blok, D.P. Bolhuis, K.P. Velikov and M. Stieger, Food Hydrocoll., 138, 108398 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2022.108398
  27. A.K.M. Nayab-Ul-Hossain, S.K. Sela, S.M.M. Alam, M.N. Hassan, J. Sarkar, C.M. Ahmed, S. Sadman, R.M. Hridoy, N. Mohsin, M.B. Hossain and S. Mia, Res. Green Sustain. Chem., 6, 100351 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crgsc.2022.100351
  28. J. Lan, J. Chen, R. Zhu, C. Lin, X. Ma and S. Cao, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 231, 123587 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.123587
  29. T.-T. Cao and Y.-Q. Zhang, Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 61, 940 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.12.082
  30. M.C. Arango, Y. Montoya, M.S. Peresin, J. Bustamante and C. Álvarez-López, Int. J. Polym. Mater., 70, 1115 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1080/00914037.2020.1785454
  31. C. Yang, L. Yao and L. Zhang, Smart Mater. Med., 4, 447 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smaim.2023.01.003
  32. D. Hu, T. Li, Z. Xu, D. Liu, M. Yang and L. Zhu, Acta Biomater., 74, 385 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2018.05.024
  33. C. Vepari and D.L. Kaplan, Prog. Polym. Sci., 32, 991 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.05.013
  34. S.U.D. Wani, S.P. Gautam, Z.L. Qadrie and H. Gangadharappa, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 163, 2145 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.09.057
  35. Y. Li, L. Yao, L. Zhang, Y. Zhang, T. Zheng, L. Liu and L. Zhang, Food Chem., 355, 129479 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129479
  36. P. Srihanam, Y. Srisuwan, T. Imsombut and Y. Baimark, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 28, 293 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-010-0322-4
  37. Y. Srisuwan, Y. Baimark and P. Srihanam, Particul. Sci. Technol., 35, 387 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1080/02726351.2016.1163301
  38. J. Cai, L. Zhang, S. Liu, Y. Liu, X. Xu, X. Chen, B. Chu, X. Guo, J. Xu, H. Cheng, C.C. Han and S. Kuga, Macromolecules, 41, 9345 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1021/ma801110g
  39. J. Yang, J. Duan, L. Zhang, B. Lindman, H. Edlund and M. Norgren, Cellulose, 23, 3105 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-1029-4
  40. H. Jin, C. Zha and L. Gu, Carbohydr. Res., 342, 851 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2006.12.023
  41. L. Alves, B. Medronho, F.E. Antunes, D. Topgaard and B. Lindman, Carbohydr. Polym., 151, 707 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.06.015
  42. D.J.G.P. van Osch, L.J.B.M. Kollau, A. van den Bruinhorst, S. Asikainen, M.A.A. Rocha and M.C. Kroon, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 19, 2636 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CP07499E
  43. S.K. Wong, J., Supramaniam, T.W. Wong, A. Soottitantawat, B.T. Tey, U.R. Ruktanonchai and S.Y. Tang, Carbohydr. Res., 504, 108336 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2021.108336
  44. M. Lassoued, F. Crispino and E. Loranger, Carbohydr. Polym., 254, 117411 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117411
  45. S. Dimida, C. Demitri, V.M. De Benedictis, F. Scalera, F. Gervaso and A. Sannino, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 132, 42256 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1002/app.42256
  46. L.-T. Lee, H.-R. Chien and C.-T. Yang, J. Polym. Res., 23, 1 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-015-0892-2
  47. S.L. DeGeer, L. Wang, G.N. Hill, M. Singh, S.F. Bilgili and C.L. Bratcher, Meat Sci., 118, 28 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.03.008
  48. T.F.M. Moreira, A. de Oliveira, T.B.V. da Silva, A.R. Dos Santos, O.H. Gonçalves, R.S. Gonzalez, A.A. Droval and F.V. Leimann, LWT Food Technol., 103, 69 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2018.12.040
  49. S. Acharya, Y. Hu, H. Moussa and N. Abidi, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 134, 44871 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1002/app.44871
  50. W. Thongsomboon, Y. Baimark and P. Srihanam, Polymers, 15, 3190 (2023); https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15153190
  51. Y. Baimark, M. Srisa-ard and P. Srihanam, Express Polym. Lett., 4, 781 (2010); https://doi.org/10.3144/expresspolymlett.2010.94
  52. T. Imsombut, M. Srisa-ard, P. Srihanam and Y. Baimark, E-Polymers, 11, 88 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1515/epoly.2011.11.1.936
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0