Issue

Vol. 34 No. 6 (2022): Vol 34 Issue 6

Copyright (c) 2022 AJC

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Removal of Copper(II) Ion using Nanochitosan/Carboxymethyl Cellulose/Grapheme Oxide Composite Biosorbent

https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2022.23631
S. Sugashini
Biomaterials Research Lab, PG and Research Department of Chemistry, D.K.M. College for Women, Vellore-632001, India
T. Gomathi
Biomaterials Research Lab, PG and Research Department of Chemistry, D.K.M. College for Women, Vellore-632001, India
S. Pavithra
Biomaterials Research Lab, PG and Research Department of Chemistry, D.K.M. College for Women, Vellore-632001, India
P.N. Sudha
Biomaterials Research Lab, PG and Research Department of Chemistry, D.K.M. College for Women, Vellore-632001, India
J. Annie Kamala Florence
Department of Chemistry, Voorhees College, Vellore-632001, India
A. Mubashirunnisa
Department of Chemistry, Sri Krishna College of Engineering, Arakkonam-631003, India

Corresponding Author(s) : T. Gomathi

drgoms1@gmail.com

Asian Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 34 No. 6 (2022): Vol 34 Issue 6

Abstract

The present study aimed to prepare a novel biosorbent of nanochitosan (NCS)/carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC)/graphene oxide (GO) and used to remove Cu(II) ion from wastewater system. The prepared nanocomposite was characterized using FTIR, XRD and SEM analysis. The FTIR and XRD results revealed the formation of novel NCS/CMC/GO nanocomposite. Rough surface morphology of nanocomposite was confirmed from the SEM analysis results. The removal efficiency of Cu(II) ion was evaluated through batch mode by varying pH, adsorbent dose, contact time and initial metal ion concentration. The maximum removal of Cu(II) ion was 80.1% at pH 4, 92.4% at 360 min contact time and about 89.2% for 3 g adsorbent dose. Theoretical models such as Langmuir isotherm, Freundlich isotherm, and kinetics models were used to evaluate the experimental results. After examining, the results revealed that the adsorption follows Freundlich isotherm and pseudo-second-order models. The adsorption capacity of the prepared nanocomposite was 145.22 mg/g.

Keywords

Ternary composite Carboxymethyl cellulose Graphene oxide Nanochitosan Batch adsorption
Sugashini, S., Gomathi, T., Pavithra, S., Sudha, P., Annie Kamala Florence, J., & Mubashirunnisa, A. (2022). Removal of Copper(II) Ion using Nanochitosan/Carboxymethyl Cellulose/Grapheme Oxide Composite Biosorbent. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 34(6), 1465–1471. https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2022.23631
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. S. Khan, A. Achazhiyath Edathil and F. Banat, Sci. Rep., 9, 18106 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54597-x
  2. P. Roccaro, M. Sgroi, and F.G.A. Vagliasindi, Chem. Eng. Trans., 32, 505 (2013); https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1332085
  3. N. Ariffin, M.M.A.B. Abdullah, M.R.R. Mohd Arif Zainol, M.F. Murshed and M.A. Hariz-Zain, Faris, and R. Bayuaji, MATEC Web Conf., 97, 01023 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20179701023
  4. S. Elabbas, L. Mandi, F. Berrekhis, M.N. Pons, J.P. Leclerc and N. Ouazzani, J. Environ. Manage., 166, 589 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.11.012
  5. K.S. Bharathi and S.T. Ramesh, Appl. Water Sci., 3, 773 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-013-0117-y
  6. J.M. Dias, M.C.M. Alvim-Ferraz, M.F. Almeida, J. Rivera-Utrilla and M. Sánchez-Polo, J. Environ. Manage., 85, 833 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.07.031
  7. N.K. Lazaridis, G.Z. Kyzas, A.A. Vassiliou and D.N. Bikiaris, Langmuir, 23, 7634 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1021/la700423j
  8. T. Gotoh, K. Matsushima and K.-I. Kikuchi, Chemosphere, 55, 135 (2004); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.11.016
  9. S. Mondal, Environ. Eng. Sci., 25, 383 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2007.0049
  10. A. Ahmad, R. Ghufran and W.M. Faizal, Clean Soil Air Water, 38, 153 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.200900202
  11. X. Cui, S. Fang, Y. Yao, T. Li, Q. Ni, X. Yang and Z. He, Sci. Total Environ., 562, 517 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.248
  12. B. Liu, X. Chen, H. Zheng, Y. Wang, Y. Sun, C. Zhao and S. Zhang, Carbohydr. Polym., 181, 327 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.10.089
  13. Z. Yu, Q. Dang, C. Liu, D. Cha, H. Zhang, W. Zhu, Q. Zhang and B. Fan, Carbohydr. Polym., 172, 28 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.05.039
  14. M.-S. Chiou, P.-Y. Ho and H.-Y. Li, Dyes Pigments, 60, 69 (2004); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-7208(03)00140-2
  15. W.S. Wan Ngah, L.C. Teong and M.A.K.M. Hanafiah, Carbohydr. Polym., 83, 1446 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.11.004
  16. F. Lu and D. Astruc, Coord. Chem. Rev., 356, 147 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2017.11.003
  17. B. Doshi, A. Ayati, B. Tanhaei, E. Repo and M. Sillanpää, Carbohydr. Polym., 197, 586 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.06.032
  18. Y.H. Khan, A. Islam, A. Sarwar, N. Gull, S.M. Khan, M.A. Munawar, S. Zia, A. Sabir, M. Shafiq and T. Jamil, Carbohydr. Polym., 146, 131 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.03.031
  19. J. Safari, Z. Abedi-Jazini, Z. Zarnegar and M. Sadeghi, Catal. Commun., 77, 108 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2016.01.007
  20. C. Zareie, S. Kholghi-Eshkalak, G. Najafpour-Darzi, M.S. Baei, H. Younesi and S. Ramakrishna, Coatings, 9, 862 (2019); https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings9120862
  21. H. Nie, M. Liu, F. Zhan and M. Guo, Carbohydr. Polym., 58, 185 (2004); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2004.06.035
  22. D.R. Biswal and R.P. Singh, Carbohydr. Polym., 57, 379 (2004); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2004.04.020
  23. F. Wang, Y. Zhu, H. Xu and A. Wang, Front Chem., 7, 603 (2019); https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2019.00603
  24. H. Yang, J.-S. Li and X. Zeng, ACS Appl. Nano Mater., 1, 2763 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.8b00405
  25. N. Van Vinh, M. Zafar, S.K. Behera and H.-S. Park, Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 12, 1283 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-014-0507-1
  26. P. Manoj Kumar Reddy, K. Krushnamurty, S.K. Mahammadunnisa, A. Dayamani and C. Subrahmanyam, Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 12, 1363 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-014-0506-2
  27. M. Ghasemi, N. Ghasemi, G. Zahedi, S.R.W. Alwi, M. Goodarzi and H. Javadian, Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 11, 1835 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-014-0617-9
  28. G. Mahajan and D. Sud, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 1, 1020 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2013.08.013
  29. T.A.H. Nguyen, H.H. Ngo, W.S. Guo, J. Zhang, S. Liang, Q.Y. Yue, Q. Li and T.V. Nguyen, Bioresour. Technol., 148, 574 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.08.124
  30. Y.-H. Li, S. Wang, Z. Luan, J. Ding, C. Xu and D. Wu, Carbon N.Y, 41, 1057 (2003); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(02)00440-2
  31. D.C. Marcano, D.V. Kosynkin, J.M. Berlin, A. Sinitskii, A. Slesarev, Z. Sun, L.B. Alemany, W. Lu and J.M. Tour, ACS Nano, 4, 4806 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1021/nn1006368
  32. K. Fung, R. Li and S. Tjong, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 85, 169 (2002); https://doi.org/10.1002/app.10584
  33. H. Deng, L. Yang, G. Tao and J. Dai, J. Hazard. Mater., 166, 1514 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.12.080
  34. S.A. Ghanem and D.S. Mikkelsen, Soil Sci., 146, 15 (1988); https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-198807000-00003
  35. J. Ocreto, C.I. Go, J.C. Chua, C.J. Apacible and A. Vilando, MATEC Web Conf., 268, 6021 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201926806021
  36. A. Itodo, H. Itodo and M. Gafar, J. Appl. Sci. Environ. Manag., 14, 1 (2011); https://doi.org/10.4314/jasem.v14i4.63287
  37. A.E. Ofomaja and Y.S. Ho, Dyes Pigments, 74, 60 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2006.01.014
  38. D. Uzunoglu, N. Gürel, N. Özkaya and A. Özer, Desalination Water Treat., 52, 1514 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2013.789403
  39. X.-Y. Huang, X.-Y. Mao, H.-T. Bu, X.-Y. Yu, G.-B. Jiang and M.-H. Zeng, Carbohydr. Res., 346, 1232 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2011.04.012
  40. M. Makesmawari, T. Santhi and P. Aswini, Int. J. Adv. Res. (Indore), 4, 542 (2016).
  41. T. Hajeeth, P.N. Sudha, K. Vijayalakshmi and T. Gomathi, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 66, 295 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.02.027
  42. H.-Y. Zhu, Y.-Q. Fu, R. Jiang, J. Yao, L. Xiao and G.-M. Zeng, Bioresour. Technol., 105, 24 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.11.057
  43. R. Lakshmipathy and N.C. Sarada, Desalination Water Treat., 57, 10632 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2015.1040462
  44. A. Labidi, A.M. Salaberria, S.C.M. Fernandes, J. Labidi and M. Abderrabba, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng., 65, 140 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2016.04.030
  45. M.-W. Wan, C.-C. Wang and C.-M. Chen, Int. J. Environ. Sci. Dev., 4, 545 (2013); https://doi.org/10.7763/IJESD.2013.V4.411
  46. M.R. Gopal Reddi, T. Gomathi, M. Saranya and P.N. Sudha, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 104, 1578 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.01.142
  47. O. Rahmani, B. Bouzid and A. Guibadj, E-Polymers, 17, 383 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1515/epoly-2016-0318
  48. K. Vijayalakshmi, T. Gomathi, S. Latha, T. Hajeeth and P.N. Sudha, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 82, 440 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.09.070
  49. M.S. Hussain, S.G. Musharraf, M.I. Bhanger and M.I. Malik, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 147, 643 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.01.091
  50. D. Allouss, Y. Essamlali, A. Chakir, S. Khadhar and M. Zahouily, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int., 27, 7476 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06950-w
  51. C.B. Godiya, X. Cheng, D. Li, Z. Chen and X. Lu, J. Hazard. Mater., 364, 28 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.09.076
  52. W.S.W. Ngah and S. Fatinathan, Chem. Eng. J., 143, 62 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2007.12.006
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0