Issue

Vol. 34 No. 5 (2022): Vol 34 Issue 5, 2022

Copyright (c) 2022 AJC

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Decomposition of Hydrogen Peroxide using Chemical and Catalytic Methods: A Reactor-based Approach

https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2022.23729
Md Shahadat Hussain Chowdhury
Electrochemistry & Catalysis Research Laboratory (ECRL), Department of Chemistry, School of Physical Sciences, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Sylhet-3100, Bangladesh
Mohebul Ahsan
Electrochemistry & Catalysis Research Laboratory (ECRL), Department of Chemistry, School of Physical Sciences, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Sylhet-3100, Bangladesh
M. Humayun Kabir
Electrochemistry & Catalysis Research Laboratory (ECRL), Department of Chemistry, School of Physical Sciences, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Sylhet-3100, Bangladesh ; Department of Chemistry, Noorjahan Memorial Women's Degree College, Bangladesh
Syed S. Alam
Electrochemistry & Catalysis Research Laboratory (ECRL), Department of Chemistry, School of Physical Sciences, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Sylhet-3100, Bangladesh
Mohammad A. Hasnat
Electrochemistry & Catalysis Research Laboratory (ECRL), Department of Chemistry, School of Physical Sciences, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Sylhet-3100, Bangladesh ; Bangladesh Academy of Sciences, Agargaon, Dhaka-1207, Bangladesh

Corresponding Author(s) : Mohammad A. Hasnat

mah-che@sust.edu

Asian Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 34 No. 5 (2022): Vol 34 Issue 5, 2022

Abstract

A feasible catalytic reactor for oxygen evolution has been proposed, which could complement the current methods of O2 evolution efficiently and ensure the availability of pure oxygen on a wider scale. Several chemicals, such as NaI, MnO2, NiSO4, etc. can generally decompose hydrogen peroxide by producing oxygen as a product via chemical reactions. Meanwhile, the Pt-Pd catalyst efficiently catalyzes hydrogen peroxide decomposition reactions and generates pure oxygen without any unfriendly species. The excellence of the bi-metallic catalyst has been validated by the evaluation of turnover number (TON) and turnover frequency (TOF). Implementing the knowledge of chemical reactions and heterogenous catalysis, the proposed catalytic reactor could be helpful for generating a continuous flow of oxygen. Surely, the oxygen produced in this process is higher in amount compared to the oxygen present in the atmosphere at ambient conditions which might facilitate the breathing support for critically ill patients.

Keywords

Hydrogen peroxide Oxygen evolution Decomposition turnover frequency turnover number Reactor
Shahadat Hussain Chowdhury, M., Ahsan, M., Humayun Kabir, M., S. Alam, S., & A. Hasnat, M. (2022). Decomposition of Hydrogen Peroxide using Chemical and Catalytic Methods: A Reactor-based Approach. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 34(5), 1263–1268. https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2022.23729
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. A. Saha, M.M. Ahsan, T.U. Quader, M.U.S. Shohan, S. Naher, P. Dutta, A.S. Akash, H.M.H. Mehedi, A.A.U. Chowdhury, H. Karim, T. Rahman and A. Parvin, J. Prev. Med. Hyg., 62, E33 (2021); https://doi.org/10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2021.62.1.1838
  2. K.R. Ward, G.S. Huvard, M. McHugh, R.R. Mallepally and R. Imbruce, Resp. Care, 58, 184 (2013); https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.01983
  3. W.J.B. Chater, Chem. Eng. Sci., 3, 118 (1954); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(54)80011-X
  4. D. Gust, T.A. Moore and A.L. Moore, Faraday Discuss., 155, 9 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1039/C1FD00110H
  5. B. Ha, Cryogenic Distillation Process for the Production of Oxygen and Nitrogen, US Patent US 5231837A (1993).
  6. T.W.K. Lew, T.K. Kwek, D. Tai, A. Earnest, S. Loo, K. Singh, K.M. Kwan, Y. Chan, C.F. Yim, S.L. Bek, A.C. Kor, W.S. Yap, Y.R. Chelliah, Y.C. Lai and S.-K. Goh, JAMA, 290, 374 (2003); https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.290.3.374
  7. H.M. Reza, F. Sultana and I.O. Khan, Open Public Health J., 13, 438 (2020); https://doi.org/10.2174/1874944502013010438
  8. N. Sakib, T. Akter, F. Zohra, A.K.M.I. Bhuiyan, M.A. Mamun and M.D. Griffiths, Int. J. Ment. Health Addiction,(2021); https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00477-9
  9. H.J. Zar, J. Dawa, G.B. Fischer and J.A. Castro-Rodriguez, Paediatr. Respir. Rev., 35, 70 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prrv.2020.06.016
  10. V.K. Jain, K.P. Iyengar and R. Vaishya, Diabetes Metab. Syndr., 15, 1047 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2021.05.009
  11. A. Haque, J. Heal Res., 34, 563 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1108/JHR-07-2020-0279
  12. A.A. Moona, S. Daria, M. Asaduzzaman and M.R. Islam, Infect. Prev. Pract., 3, 100159 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infpip.2021.100159
  13. J.M. Aubry, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 107, 5844 (1985); https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00307a002
  14. S. Ranganathan and V. Sieber, Catalysts, 8, 379 (2018); https://doi.org/10.3390/catal8090379
  15. M.J. Liou and M.C. Lu, J. Hazard. Mater., 151, 540 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.06.016
  16. Y. Voloshin, R. Halder and A. Lawal, Catal. Today, 125, 40 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2007.01.043
  17. W. Chen, F. Chen, G. Zhang, S. Kong, W. Cai, J. Wang, L. Du and C. Wu, Mater. Lett., 239, 94 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2018.12.064
  18. S.H. Lee, I.I. Nedrygailov, S. Oh and J.Y. Park, Catal. Today, 303, 282 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2017.09.038
  19. G. Fang, Y. Deng, M. Huang, D.D. Dionysiou, C. Liu and D. Zhou, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 2178 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b05303
  20. T. Kim, J.S. Hwang and S. Kwon, Lab Chip, 7, 835 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1039/b700040e
  21. M.A. Hasnat, M.M. Rahman, S.M. Borhanuddin, A. Siddiqua, N.M. Bahadur and M.R. Karim, Catal. Commun., 12, 286 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2010.10.001
  22. L. Trotochaud and S.W. Boettcher, Scr. Mater., 74, 25 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.07.019
  23. D.E. McCoy, T. Feo, T.A. Harvey and R.O. Prum, Nat. Commun., 9, 1 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02088-w
  24. J.S. Kim, B. Kim, H. Kim and K. Kang, Adv. Energy Mater., 8, 1702774 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201702774
  25. X. Xu, F. Song and X. Hu, Nat. Commun., 7, 12324 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12324
  26. S.R. Ede and Z. Luo, J. Mater. Chem. A Mater. Energy Sustain., 9, 20131 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1039/D1TA04032D
  27. M.A. Hasnat, M.S. Alam, M.M. Karim, M.A. Rashed and M. Machida, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 107, 294 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2011.07.028
  28. J.C. Hansen, J. Chem. Educ., 73, 728 (1996); https://doi.org/10.1021/ed073p728
  29. H.A. Liebhafsky and A. Mohammad, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 55, 3977 (1933); https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01337a010
  30. H.A. Liebhafsky, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 53, 896 (1931); https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01354a010
  31. D.B. Broughton, R.L. Wentworth and M.E. Laing, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 69, 744 (1947); https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01196a004
  32. D.B. Broughton and R.L. Wentworth, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 69, 741 (1947); https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01196a003
  33. J.J. Rusek, J. Propulsion Power, 12, 574 (2012); https://doi.org/10.2514/3.24071
  34. W. He, Y.T. Zhou, W.G. Wamer, X. Hu, X. Wu, Z. Zheng, M.D. Boudreau and J.-J. Yin, Biomaterials, 34, 765 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.10.010
  35. M.A. Hasan, M.I. Zaki, L. Pasupulety and K. Kumari, Appl. Catal. A Gen., 181, 171 (1999); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-860X(98)00430-X
  36. R. Serra-Maia, M. Bellier, S. Chastka, K. Tranhuu, A. Subowo, J.D. Rimstidt, P.M. Usov, A.J. Morris and F.M. Michel, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 10, 21224 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b02345
  37. A. Thetford, G.J. Hutchings, S.H. Taylor and D.J. Willock, The Decomposition of H2O2 over the Components of Au/TiO2 Catalysts. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, The Royal Society Publishing, pp. 1885–1899 (2011.
  38. J. Hofmann, U. Freier, M. Wecks and S. Hohmann, Appl. Catal. B, 70, 447 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2005.11.023
  39. V. Polshettiwar and R.S. Varma, Org. Biomol. Chem., 7, 37 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1039/B817669H
  40. R. Serra-Maia, M. Bellier, S. Chastka, K. Tranhuu, A. Subowo, J.D. Rimstidt, P.M. Usov, A.J. Morris and F.M. Michel, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 10, 21224 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b02345
  41. M.A. Hasnat, M.M. Rahman, I.A. Siddiquey, S.M. Borhanuddin, M.S. Alam, M.H. Rahman and A.M. Asiri, RSC Adv., 5, 46295 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA05620A
  42. S.Q. Liu and H.X. Ju, Anal. Biochem., 307, 110 (2002); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2697(02)00014-3
  43. D.R. Shobha Jeykumari, S. Ramaprabhu and S. Sriman Narayanan, Carbon, 45, 1340 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2007.01.006
  44. M. Comotti, C. Della Pina, R. Matarrese and M. Rossi, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 43, 5812 (2004); https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200460446
  45. S. Kozuch and J.M.L. Martin, ACS Catal., 2, 2787 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1021/cs3005264
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 8 Download : 3