Issue

Vol. 34 No. 4 (2022): Vol 34 Issue 4, 2022

Copyright (c) 2022 AJC

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Green Synthesis and in vitro Anti-Tubercular Activity of Monometallic and Bimetallic Oxide Nanoparticles

https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2022.23661
Vidya K. Kalyankar
Post Graduate and Research Centre, Department of Chemistry, MES Abasaheb Garware College, Pune-411004, India
Varsha S. Honmore
Post Graduate and Research Centre, Department of Chemistry, MES Abasaheb Garware College, Pune-411004, India
Shobha A. Waghmode
Post Graduate and Research Centre, Department of Chemistry, MES Abasaheb Garware College, Pune-411004, India
Sharada P. Dagade
Department of Chemistry, Y.M. College, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University, Erandawana, Pune-411038, India

Corresponding Author(s) : Vidya K. Kalyankar

vkk.agc@mespune.in

Asian Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 34 No. 4 (2022): Vol 34 Issue 4, 2022

Abstract

Tuberculosis (TB) is an infectious disease with limited drugs and currently the research is focused on its prevention, diagnosis and treatment. In recent studies, it is observed that the therapeutics approach of tuberculosis is more convenient to use nanoparticles for the treatment. With this regard, we foccussed present study towards modified green synthesis of monometallic oxide and bimetallic Cu-Zn and Cu-Mn oxide nanoparticles using Ficus religosa extract. All the synthesized bimetallic Cu-Zn oxide and Cu-Mn oxide nanoparticles were characterized by powdered XRD, FTIR, FE-SEM with EDS reports and ESR spectra. All the monometallic and bimetallic oxide nanoparticles were tested for in vitro anti-tubercular, antibacterial and cytotoxic activity. The Cu-Mn oxide nanoparticles showed promising result with IC50 = 6.27 μg/mL, MIC = 53.61 μg/mL and IC50 = 8.81 μg/mL, MIC= 54.82 μg/mL against M. tuberculosis H37Ra at dormant state and active state, respectively. Whereas Cu-Zn and Cu-Mn oxide nanoparticles showed moderate effect against M. tuberculosis H37Ra. On the other hand, all these nanoparticles were inactive against two Gram-positive and two Gram-negative bacterial strains with low cytotoxicity.

Keywords

Bimetallic nanoparticles Ficus religosa Green synthesis Anti-mycobacterial activity Cytotoxicity
K. Kalyankar, V., S. Honmore, V., A. Waghmode, S., & P. Dagade, S. (2022). Green Synthesis and in vitro Anti-Tubercular Activity of Monometallic and Bimetallic Oxide Nanoparticles. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 34(4), 926–930. https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2022.23661
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. D. Dhamnetiya, P. Patel, R.P. Jha, N. Shri, M. Singh and K. Bhattacharyya, BMC Pulm. Med., 21, 375 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-021-01740-y
  2. H. Cox, S. Hargreaves and G. Ismailov, Lancet, 362, 1858 (2003); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140 6736(03)14918-5
  3. A. Kolloli and S. Subbian, Front. Med., 4, 171 (2017); https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2017.00171
  4. P.H. Elworthy and C.B. Macfarlane, J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci., 14, 100 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-7158.1962.tb10540.x
  5. S. Vijayakumar, M. Nilavukkarasi and B. Sakthivel, Gene Rep., 20, 100764 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genrep.2020.100764
  6. Y.V. Anisimova, S.I. Gelperina, C.A. Peloquin and L.B. Heifets, J. Nanopart. Res., 2, 165 (2000); https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010061013365
  7. E. Grotz, N. Tateosian, N. Amiano, M. Cagel, E. Bernabeu, D.A. Chiappetta and M.A. Moretton, Pharm. Res., 35, 213 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-018-2497-z
  8. A. Gupta, S. Pandey and J.S. Yadav, Adv. Pharm. Bull., 11, 10 (2021); https://doi.org/10.34172/apb.2021.002
  9. V.K. Kalyankar, S.P. Dagade and S.A. Waghmode, Res. J. Chem. Environ., 19, 44 (2015).
  10. U. Holzwarth and N. Gibson, Nature Nanotechnology, 6, 534 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2011.145
  11. U. Singh, S. Akhtar, A. Mishra and D. Sarkar, J. Microbiol. Methods, 84, 202 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2010.11.013
  12. S. Sarkar and D. Sarkar, J. Biomol. Screen., 17, 966 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1177/1087057112445485
  13. J.P. Dzoyem, S.K. Guru, C.A. Pieme, V. Kuete, A. Sharma, I.A. Khan, A.K. Saxena and R.A. Vishwakarma, BMC Complement. Altern. Med., 13, 78 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-13-78
  14. C.L. Cantrell, I.S. Nuñez, J. Castañeda-Acosta, M. Foroozesh, F.R. Fronczek, N.H. Fischer and S.G. Franzblau, J. Nat. Prod., 61, 1181 (1998); https://doi.org/10.1021/np970333i
  15. S. Kang, R.Y. Kim, M.J. Seo, S. Lee, Y.M. Kim, M. Seo, J.J. Seo, Y. Ko, I. Choi, J. Jang, J. Nam, S. Park, H. Kang, H.J. Kim, J. Kim, S. Ahn, K. Pethe, K. Nam, Z. No and J. Kim, J. Med. Chem., 57, 5293 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1021/jm5003606
  16. A.A. van de Loosdrecht, G.J. Ossenkopele, R.H.J. Beelen, M.G. Broekhoven, M.H. van Of, A.M. Drager, P.C. Huijgens and M.M. Langenhuijsen, Leukemia, 8, 1392 (1994).
  17. M.C. Alley, D.A. Scudiero, A. Monks, M.L. Hursey, M.J. Ciezerwinski and D.L. Fine, Cancer Res., 48, 589 (1988).
  18. G. Ciapetti, E. Cenni, L. Pratelli and A. Pizzoferrato, Biomaterials, 14, 359 (1993); https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(93)90055-7
  19. T. Mosmann, J. Immunol. Methods, 65, 55 (1983); https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4
  20. Triloki, P. Garg, R. Rai and B.K. Singh, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, 736, 128 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2013.10.075
  21. L.M. Seaverson and J.D. Corbett, Inorg. Chem., 22, 3202 (1983); https://doi.org/10.1021/ic00164a008
  22. Z.W. Mao, K.B. Yu, D. Chen, S.Y. Han, Y.X. Sui and W.X. Tang, Inorg. Chem., 32, 3104 (1993); https://doi.org/10.1021/ic00066a023
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 3 Download : 1