Issue

Vol. 34 No. 11 (2022): Vol 34 Issue 11, 2022

Copyright (c) 2022 AJC

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Application of Glucoamylase Hydrolysis with Anaerobically Driven Microbial Fuel Cells: Effect on Energy Generation from Potato Wastes

https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2022.23929
Md. Nurul Islam Siddique
Faculty of Ocean Engineering Technology & Informatics, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030 Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysia
B.K. Zaied
Faculty of Civil Engineering Technology, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, 26300 Gambang, Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia
Mohd. Zamri Bin Ibrahim
Faculty of Ocean Engineering Technology & Informatics, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030 Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysia
Noraaini Binti Ali
Faculty of Ocean Engineering Technology & Informatics, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030 Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysia; Institute of Tropical Aquaculture & Fisheries, University Malaysia Terengganu, Kuala Nerus, Malaysia
Nazaitulshila Rasit
Faculty of Ocean Engineering Technology & Informatics, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030 Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysia
Muhammad Syarifuddin Yahya
Faculty of Ocean Engineering Technology & Informatics, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030 Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysia
Waheed Ali H. M. Ghanem
Faculty of Ocean Engineering Technology & Informatics, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030 Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysia

Corresponding Author(s) : Md. Nurul Islam Siddique

m.nurul@umt.edu.my

Asian Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 34 No. 11 (2022): Vol 34 Issue 11, 2022

Abstract

A unique dual-phase biological system for producing power from the potato wastes was developed. In the beginning, commercially available glucoamylase was used to hydrolyze potato wastes resulting the production of potato waste hydrolyzate. A 100 g of potato waste produced 30 g of hydrolysis solid and 750 mL of potato waste hydrolyzate. Within 6 h, the maximum glucose generation was 20 g/L while the maximum COD elimination was 85%. During the second phase, the soluble potato waste hydrolyzate was utilized to feed microbial fuel cells (MFC), which produced electricity. The maximum voltage measured was 1.1 V. When the external resistance was 1091 Ω, the power density reached its greatest point of 93 mW/m3. To evaluate MFC performance, a Coulombic efficiency of 20% was obtained, thus exploring a new field by converting the high-starch molecules into biofuels, thereby lowering the cost of commercial biofuel production.

Keywords

Glucoamylase Electricity production Enzymatic hydrolysis Microbial fuel cell Potato wastes
Nurul Islam Siddique, M., Zaied, B., Zamri Bin Ibrahim, M., Binti Ali, N., Rasit, N., Syarifuddin Yahya, M., & Ali H. M. Ghanem, W. (2022). Application of Glucoamylase Hydrolysis with Anaerobically Driven Microbial Fuel Cells: Effect on Energy Generation from Potato Wastes. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 34(11), 2905–2909. https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2022.23929
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. J. Malinauskaite, H. Jouhara, D. Czajczynska, P. Stanchev, E. Katsou, P. Rostkowski, R.J. Thorne, J. Colón, F. Al-Mansour, L. Anguilano, R. Krzyzynska, S. Ponsá, I.C. López, A. Vlasopoulos and N. Spencerk, Energy, 141, 2013 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.11.128
  2. D.M.-C. Chen, B.L. Bodirsky, T. Krueger, A. Mishra and A. Popp, Environ. Res. Lett., 15, 074021 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab8659
  3. H.Y. Gebrechristos and W. Chen, Food Sci. Nutr., 6, 1352 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.691
  4. S.A. Abbasi, Energy Sustain. Soc., 8, 36 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-018-0175-y
  5. N.A. Rashidi, Y.H. Chai and S. Yusup, Bioenergy Res., 15, 1371 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-022-10392-7
  6. O. Awogbemi, D.V. Von Kallon and A.O. Owoputi, Recycling, 7, 23 (2022); https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling7020023
  7. P.A. Owusu and S. Asumadu-Sarkodie and S. Dubey, Cogent Eng., 3, 1167990 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2016.1167990
  8. R. Avtar, S. Tripathi, A.K. Aggarwal and P. Kumar, Resources, 8, 136 (2019); https://doi.org/10.3390/resources8030136
  9. J.C. Rajesh Kumar and M.A. Majid, Energy Sustain. Soc., 10, 2 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-019-0232-1
  10. Ö. Esen and M. Bayrak, J. Econ. Finan. Admin. Sci., 22, 75 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1108/JEFAS-01-2017-0015
  11. M.N. Islam Siddique, Z.B. Khalid and M.Z.B. Ibrahim, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 8, 103569 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2019.103569
  12. H. Jing, R. Wang, Q. Jiang, Y. Zhang and X. Peng, Sci. Total Environ., 748, 142459 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142459
  13. M. Indren, C.H. Birzer, S.P. Kidd, T. Hall and P.R. Medwell, Bioresour. Technol., 298, 122457 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122457
  14. M.N. Islam Siddique, A.W. Zularisam, Z. Ideris and S. Mimi, Int. J. Civil Eng. Geo-Environ., 2, 59 (2011).
  15. R. Pourbayramian, H. Abdi-Benemar, J. Seifdavati, R. Greiner, M.M.M.Y. Elghandour and A.Z.M. Salem, J. Clean. Prod., 280, 124411 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124411
  16. W.B. Han,Y. Z. Zhao and H. Chen, Procedia Environ. Sci., 35, 756 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2016.07.089
  17. Y.F. Guan, F. Zhang, B.C. Huang, H.Q. Yu, J. Clean. Prod., 229, 412 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.040
  18. C.T. Weber, L.F. Trierweiler and J.O. Trierweiler, J. Clean. Prod., 268, 121788 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121788
  19. K.R. Szulczyk and M.A. Cheema, J. Clean. Prod., 286, 124953 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124953
  20. S. Kasavan, N.I.B.M. Ali, S.S.B.S. Ali, N.A.B. Masarudin and S.B. Yusoff, Resour. Conserv. Recycling, 164, 105176 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105176
  21. E. Derman, R. Abdulla, H. Marbawi and M.K. Sabullah, Renew. Energy, 129, 285 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.06.003
  22. N.I.H.A. Aziz, M.M. Hanafiah and S.H. Gheewala, Biomass Bioenergy, 122, 361 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.01.047
  23. A. Naderipour, Z. Abdul-Malek, N.A. Ahmad, V. Ashokkumar, H. Kamyab, C. Ngamcharussrivichai and S. Chelliapan, Environ. Technol. Innov., 20, 101151 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2020.101151
  24. G. Civan, B. Palas, G. Ersöz, S. Atalay, I. Bavasso and L. Di Palma, J. Photochem. Photobiol. Chem., 407, 113056 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2020.113056
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0