Issue

Vol. 33 No. 11 (2021): Vol 33 Issue 11, 2021

Copyright (c) 2021 AJC

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Electrochemical Characterization of Cellulose Acetate/Chitosan Membrane in Presence and Absence of Nonionic Surfactant in Monovalent Electrolytic Solution

https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2021.22446
Satya Nath
Department of Chemistry, D.D.U. Gorakhpur University, Gorakhpur-173009, India
A.K. Tiwari
Department of Chemistry, D.D.U. Gorakhpur University, Gorakhpur-173009, India
P.K. Tiwari
Department of Chemistry, D.D.U. Gorakhpur University, Gorakhpur-173009, India

Corresponding Author(s) : Satya Nath

styanathyadav5390@gmail.com

Asian Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 33 No. 11 (2021): Vol 33 Issue 11, 2021

Abstract

The influence of surfactant on cellulose acetate/chitosan membrane has been investigated. A basic approach to cellulose acetate/chitosan membrane is also mentioned. Nonionic surfactants are disrupted the normal permeability of the characteristic membrane. Electrochemical characterization such as conductance, flow, flux and permeability are measured in various concentrations of the electrolyte and surfactants. Membrane potential is determined by the combination of the properties of ions of the electrolyte, surfactant and membrane. The synthesized membrane was found to be cation selective with measured membrane potential found to be negative in all cases. The value of membrane potential was varying in different concentration of the electrolyte and surfactant. The Teorell Meyer and Sievers (TMS) theoretical method was employed for calculating the Transport number, perm selectivity and fixed charge density of the membrane by using the data of membrane potential across normal and surfactant modified membrane with electrolytic solution of NaCl. The variation of fixed density and perm selectivity also depends on the concentration of the electrolyte and surfactant (Tween 20 and Tween 60).

Keywords

Cellulose acetate/chitosan Tween 20 Tween 60 Permeability Transport number Fixed charge density.
Nath, S., Tiwari, A., & Tiwari, P. (2021). Electrochemical Characterization of Cellulose Acetate/Chitosan Membrane in Presence and Absence of Nonionic Surfactant in Monovalent Electrolytic Solution. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 33(11), 2693–2699. https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2021.22446
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. S. Kumar, H.M. Meena and K. Verma, J. Appl. Environ. Sci., 12, 275 (2017).
  2. S. Adham, A. Hussain, J. Minier-Matar, A. Janson and R. Sharma, Desalination, 440, 2 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2018.01.030
  3. P.H.H. Duong and T. Chung, J. Membr. Sci., 452, 117 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.10.030
  4. A. Kayvani Fard, G. McKay, A. Buekenhoudt, H. Al Sulaiti, F. Motmans, M. Khraisheh and M. Atieh, Materials, 11, 74 (2018); https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11010074
  5. N.L. Le and S.P. Nunes, Sustainable Mater. Technol., 7, 1 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susmat.2016.02.001
  6. C.P. Jiménez-Gómez and J.A. Cecilia, Molecules, 25, 3981 (2020); https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25173981
  7. H.Y. Zhou and X.G. Chen, Front. Mater. Sci. China, 2, 417 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1007/s11706-008-0063-z
  8. R. Kumar, A.M. Isloor, A.F. Ismail, S.A. Rashid and T. Matsuura, RSC Adv., 3, 7855 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ra00070
  9. Z. Wang, A. Wu, L. Colombi Ciacchi and G. Wei, Nanomaterials, 8, 65 (2018); https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8020065
  10. G.M. Geise, H.S. Lee, D.J. Miller, B.D. Freeman, J.E. McGrath and D.R. Paul, J. Polym. Sci., 48, 1685 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1002/polb.22037
  11. J. Desbrieres, C. Bousquet and V. Babak, Cellul. Chem. Technol., 44, 395 (2010).
  12. J. Desbrieres and V. Babak, Soft Matter, 6, 2358 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1039/b926400k
  13. D. Rana and T. Matsuura, Chem. Rev., 110, 2448 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1021/cr800208y
  14. A. Canas, M.J. Ariza and J. Benavente, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 246, 150 (2002); https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.2001.8004
  15. A.K. Tiwari and S. Nath, Rasayan J. Chem., 12, 73 (2019); https://doi.org/10.31788/RJC.2019.1213093
  16. I. Younes and M. Rinaudo, Mar. Drugs, 13, 1133 (2015); https://doi.org/10.3390/md13031133
  17. N. Rehman, H. Ullah, S. Alam and A.K. Jan, J. Mater. Environ. Sci., 8, 1161 (2017).
  18. K. Singh and A.K. Tiwari, J. Membr. Sci., 34, 155 (1987); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(00)80029-0
  19. A.K. Tiwari, R. Sonkar, S. Tanveer and P.K. Tiwari, Desalination, 313, 125 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2012.12.018
  20. W.-J. Shang, X.-L. Wang and Y.-X. Yu, J. Membr. Sci., 285, 362 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.09.005
  21. G.M. Geise, H.J. Cassady, D.R. Paul, B.E. Logan and M.A. Hickner, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 16, 21673 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CP03076A
  22. N. Lakshminarayanaiah, Transport Phenomena in Membrane, Academic Press: New York (1969).
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0