Issue

Vol. 37 No. 8 (2025): Vol 37 Issue 8, 2025

Copyright (c) 2025 Divyanshi Mishra, Indu Saxena, Aditya Gupta, Preeti Yadav

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Synthesis and DFT Analysis of Thermoplastic Starch Bioplastics: A Sustainable Alternative for Green Packaging

https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2025.33992
Divyanshi Mishra
Department of Chemistry, University of Lucknow, Lucknow-226007, India
https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6518-6523
Indu Saxena
Department of Chemistry, University of Lucknow, Lucknow-226007, India
https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5767-2401
Aditya Gupta
Department of Chemistry, University of Lucknow, Lucknow-226007, India
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5736-8098
Preeti Yadav
Department of Chemistry, University of Lucknow, Lucknow-226007, India
https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9154-380X

Corresponding Author(s) : Indu Saxena

indu_lu@yahoo.com

Asian Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 37 No. 8 (2025): Vol 37 Issue 8, 2025

Abstract

The growing environmental concerns about synthetic polymers have increased the need for biodegradable alternatives made from renewable resources. Starch, a naturally abundant and low-cost polysaccharide, appears to be a potential contender for long-term polymer applications. This work explores the structural and thermo-physical properties of thermoplastic starch (TPS) for use in the sustainable packaging. At 323.15 K, concentration-dependent behaviour was observed, with density increasing from 1026.5 to 1028.4 kg m–3 and viscosity increasing from 1.9855 × 10–3 to 2.1887 × 10–3 Ns m–2 as polymer concentration increased. Acoustic impedance increased proportionally (1606.47 to 1634.13 kg m–2 s–1), but adiabatic compressibility fell from 3.9775 × 10–10 to 3.8511 × 1010 kg–1 ms2, suggesting higher intermolecular interactions. DFT simulations showed that hydration improves the electrical stability of TPS by raising the HOMO-LUMO gap to 15.0763 eV, compared to 14.6969 eV for native starch. Thermodynamic study found that TPS had increased vibrational energy (281.045 kcal/mol) and entropy (187.904 cal/mol-K), confirming structural changes. Global reactivity descriptors indicated an improved chemical hardness (7.5382 eV) and decreased electrophilicity (0.0239 eV), confirmed improved material stability. Molecular docking revealed hydrogen bonding as the fundamental interaction mechanism (binding energy: -1.47 kcal/mol). These findings provide quantitative insights into TPS’s adjustable features, emphasizing its promise as a sustainable alternative to traditional polymers.

Keywords

Potato starch Biodegradable polymers DFT Hydrogen bonding interactions
(1)
Mishra, D.; Saxena, I.; Gupta, A.; Yadav, P. Synthesis and DFT Analysis of Thermoplastic Starch Bioplastics: A Sustainable Alternative for Green Packaging. ajc 2025, 37, 1885-1892.
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. OECD, Global Plastics Outlook: Policy Scenarios to 2060. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2022; https://doi.org/10.1787/aa1edf33-en
  2. R. Geyer, J.R. Jambeck and K.L. Law, Sci. Adv., 3, e1700782 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1700782
  3. C. Li, T. Jiang, C. Zhou, A. Jiang, C. Lu, G. Yang, J. Nie, F. Wang, X. Yang and Z. Chen, Carbohydr. Polym., 299, 120198 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.120198
  4. P.J. Halley and L. Avérous, Starch Polymers: From Genetic Engineering to Green Applications, Amsterdam: Elsevier (2022); https://doi.org/10.1016/C2009-0-64023-X
  5. R. Qin and H.C. Zeng, ACS Sustain. Chem.& Eng., 6, 14979 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b03468
  6. M.R. Yates and C.Y. Barlow, Resour. Conserv. Recycling, 78, 54 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.06.010
  7. S. Pérez and E. Bertoft, Stärke, 62, 389 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1002/star.201000013
  8. H.-Y. Kim, J.-L. Jane and B. Lamsal, Ind. Crops Prod., 95, 175 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.10.025
  9. H. Liu, F. Xie, L. Yu, L. Chen and L. Li, Prog. Polym. Sci., 34, 1348 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.07.001
  10. X. Ma and J. Yu, Carbohydr. Polym., 57, 197 (2004); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2004.04.012
  11. D. Lourdin, G.D. Valle and P. Colonna, Carbohydr. Polym., 27, 261 (1995); https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-8617(95)00071-2
  12. L. Zha, S. Wang, L.A. Berglund and Q. Zhou, Carbohydr. Polym., 300, 120276 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.120276
  13. R. Thakur, P. Pristijono, C.J. Scarlett, M. Bowyer, S.P. Singh and Q.V. Vuong, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 132, 1079 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.03.190
  14. G. Bapat, C. Labade, A. Chaudhari and S. Zinjarde, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 237, 1 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2016.06.001
  15. H. Abramczyk, A. Imiela and A. Œliwiñska, J. Mol. Liq., 272, 1002 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2018.10.082
  16. F. Xie, E. Pollet, P.J. Halley and L. Avérous, Prog. Polym. Sci., 135, 101625 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2023.101625
  17. P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Phys. Rev., 136(3B), B864 (1964); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.136.B864
  18. X. He and Q. Lu, Carbohydr. Polym., 301, 120351 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.120351
  19. I. Saxena, R.N. Pathak, V. Kumar and R. Devi, Int. J. Appl. Res., 9, 562 (2015); https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.35801.83044
  20. R.N. Pathak and I. Saxena, Indian J. Eng. Mater. Sci., 5, 278 (1998).
  21. P.S. Nikam and M. Hasan, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 88, 165 (1988); https://doi.org/10.1021/je00052a032
  22. Y.-J. Chen, Q. Cao, J. Li, B. Yu and W.-Q. Tao, J. Mol. Liq., 311, 13306 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2020.113306
  23. T. Lu and F. Chen, J. Comput. Chem., 33, 580 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.22885
  24. R. Pal and P.K. Chattaraj, J. Indian Chem. Soc., 98, 100008 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jics.2021.100008
  25. P.K. Chattaraj and U. Sarkar, Chemical Reactivity Dynamics in Ground and Excited Electronic States, In: Theoretical and Computational Chemistry, Chap. 13, pp. 269–286 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1016/S1380-7323(07)80014-8
  26. N. Jongkon, B. Seaho, N. Tayana, S. Prateeptongkum, N. Duangdee and P. Jaiyong, Molecules, 27, 2346 (2022); https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27072346
  27. R.F. Friesner, R.B. Murphy, M.P. Repasky, L.L. Frye, J.R. Greenwood, T.A. Halgren, P.C. Sanschagrin and D.T. Mainz, J. Med. Chem., 49, 6177 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1021/jm051256o
  28. A. Mohammadi Nafchi, M. Moradpour, M. Saeidi and A.K. Alias, Stärke, 65, 61 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1002/star.201200201
  29. X. Ma, J. Yu and N. Wang, Compos. Sci. Technol., 68, 268 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.03.016
  30. H. Dai, P.R. Chang, J. Yu and X.N. Ma, Stärke, 60, 676 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1002/star.200800017
  31. E.D. Glendening, C.R. Landis and F. Weinhold, J. Comput. Chem., 40, 2114 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.25873
  32. L.K. Voon, S.C. Pang and S.F. Chin, Carbohydr. Polym., 142, 31 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.01.027
  33. Y. Zhang, X. Wang, C. Xu, W. Yan, Q. Tian, Z. Sun, H. Yao and J. Gao, Carbohydr. Polym., 186, 1 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.12.062
  34. A.K. Mishra, C. Murli, K.K. Pandey, T. Sakuntala, H.K. Poswal and A.K. Verma, J. Phys. Chem. B, 124, 373 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b10432
  35. A. Kumar, B. Singh and V.K. Yadav, RSC Adv., 9, 13693 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RA01234D
  36. L. Chen and S. Lee, Polymer, 202, 122623 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2020.122623
  37. R.G. Parr, L.V. Szentpály and S. Liu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 121, 1922 (1999); https://doi.org/10.1021/ja983494x
  38. Z. Mou, Q. Yang, B. Zhao, X. Li, Y. Xu, T. Gao, H. Zheng, K. Zhou and D. Xiao, ACS Sustain. Chem.& Eng., 10, 512 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c05678
  39. T. Xu, Z. Gao, Y. Jia, X. Miao, X. Zhu, J. Lu, B. Wang, Y. Song, G. Ren and X. Li, Cellulose, 28, 4329 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-021-03803-z
  40. B.J. Oosten, Stärke, 34, 233 (1982); https://doi.org/10.1002/star.19820340706
  41. X. Liu, Y. Tong and L. Zhang, Food Chem., 303, 125369 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125369
  42. S. Elanthikkal, U. Gopalakrishnapanicker, S. Varghese and J.T. Guthrie, Carbohydr. Polym., 80, 852 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.12.043
  43. S. Gunasekaran, S. Kumaresan, R. Arunbalaji, G. Anand and S. Srinivasan, J. Chem. Sci., 120, 315 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1007/s12039-008-0054-8
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 181 Download : 151
PlumX