Issue

Vol. 32 No. 8 (2020): Vol 32 Issue 8, 2020

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Influence of Different Carriers in Polymer Inclusion Membranes for Desalination of Seawater

https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2020.22636
Muhammad Cholid Djunaidi
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia
Pardoyo
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia
Tri Wahyuni
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia

Corresponding Author(s) : Muhammad Cholid Djunaidi

choliddjunaidi@live.undip.ac.id

Asian Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 32 No. 8 (2020): Vol 32 Issue 8, 2020

Abstract

Desalination of seawater using various polymer inclusion membranes was carried out. Polymer inclusion membrane (PIM) is known to have the highest stability, able to overcome liquid membrane instability and was placed in between two phases: the source phase is seawater and the receiving phase is the micro-filtered water. Determination of salinity levels in the feed phase and the receiving phase was carried out using a salinity meter, while membrane characterization was done using FTIR and SEM techniques. Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) based PIM membranes were prepared using different single and mixed synergtic carriers ratio of 1:1 viz. dibutyl ether, methyl-trioctylammonium chloride (Aliquat 336), di-(2-ethylhexyl)-phosphate (D2EHPA), thenoyl trifluoroacetone (HTTA), tributyl phosphate (TBP) and eugenol (PE). The results showed the salinity value for single HTTA carriers had a greater salinity value in comparison to mixed carriers (HTTA:TBP; HTTA:Aliquat; D2EHPA:TBP; and D2EHPA:Aliquat) gave different salinity value towards the desalination process.

Keywords

Polymer inclusion membrane Salinity Desalination
Djunaidi, M. C. ., Pardoyo, ., & Wahyuni, T. . (2020). Influence of Different Carriers in Polymer Inclusion Membranes for Desalination of Seawater. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 32(8), 1869–1873. https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2020.22636
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. M. Shatat and S.B. Riffat, Int. J. Low-Carbon Technol., 9, 1 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlct/cts025
  2. I.G. Wenten, D. Ariono, M. Purwasasmita and Khoirudin, AIP Conf. Proc., 1818, 020065 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4976929
  3. F.J. Millero, R. Feistel, D.G. Wright and T.J. McDougall, Deep Sea Res. I: Oceanograp. Res. Pap., 55, 50 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1524/1/012142
  4. P.G. Youssef, R.K. Al-Dadah and S.M. Mahmoud, Energy Procedia, 61, 2604 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.12.258
  5. N.S. Rathore, A.M. Sastre and A.K. Pabby, J. Membr. Sci. Res., 2, 2 (2016); https://doi.org/10.22079/JMSR.2016.15872
  6. M. Sugiura, M. Kikkawa and S. Urita, J. Membr. Sci., 42, 47 (1989); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(00)82364-9
  7. P. Religa, J. Rajewski and P. Gierycz, Pol. J. Environ. Stud., 24, 1283 (2015).
  8. Maryati, Ph.D. Thesis, Supported Liquid membrane (SLM) with Anionic Carrier for Desalination Seawater, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia (2008).
  9. M.M. Naima and A.A. Monir, Desalination, 153, 361 (2003); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(02)01129-3
  10. M.C. Djunaidi, P.J. Wibawa and R.H. Murti, Indones. J. Chem., 18, 121 (2018); https://doi.org/10.22146/ijc.25075
  11. B. Arkles, Hydrophobicity, Hydrophilicity and Silane Surface Modifi-cation, Gelest Inc, Morrisville, p. 4 (2011).
  12. M.I.G.S. Almeida, R.W. Cattrall and S.D. Kolev, J. Membr. Sci., 415-416, 9 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2012.06.006
  13. L.D. Nghiem, P. Mornane, I.D. Potter, J.M. Perera, R.W. Catrall and S.D. Kolev, J. Membr. Sci., 281, 7 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.03.035
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 10