Issue

Vol. 32 No. 12 (2020): Vol 32 Issue 12, 2020

Copyright (c) 2020 AJC

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Fabrication and Characterization of Chitosan-Polypyrrole/Strontium-Magnesium Substituted Hydroxyapatite Biocomposite with Potential Application in Tissue Engineering Scaffolds

https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2020.22936
P. Lavanya
Department of Chemistry, Government Arts College for Women, Salem-636008, India; Department of Chemistry, Vivekanandha College for Arts and Science for Women, Veerachipalayam, Sankari-637303, India
N. Vijayakumari
Department of Chemistry, Government Arts College for Women, Salem-636008, India
R. Sangeetha
Department of Chemistry, Government Arts College for Women, Salem-636008, India ; Department of Chemistry, Shri Sakthikailassh Women′s College, Salem-636003, India
G. Priya
Department of Chemistry, Government Arts College for Women, Salem-636008, India ; Department of Chemistry, Shri Sakthikailassh Women′s College, Salem-636003, India

Corresponding Author(s) : P. Lavanya

srilavs870@gmail.com

Asian Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 32 No. 12 (2020): Vol 32 Issue 12, 2020

Abstract

Biocomposite scaffolds of strontium-magnesium substituted hydroxyapatite (SMHA) with a mixture of chitosan/polypyrrole (CS-PPY) have been prepared by solvent casting method. The synthesized SMHA nanoparticles and biocomposite scaffold were characterized by FTIR, XRD and SEM techniques. The SEM morphology revealed the porous structure of the scaffolds designed for the muticomponents. The biomineralization and cell viability of the biocomposite were assessed via alkaline phosphatase activity and MTT assay on the osteoblast cell line. The study demonstrated improved differentiation and mineralization of osteoblast cells in the designed biocomposite scaffolds. The dye stained fluorescent microscopic photographs apparent the good scattering and permeability of cells onto the scaffolds. However, biocomposite demonstrated good antibacterial activity and the excellent biocompatibility against osteoblast cells offers a possible route for the production of a biocomposite as a viable replacement for regenerative medicine scaffolding substance.

Keywords

Bone Biocomposite Hydroxyapatite Scaffolds Tissue engineering
Lavanya, P., Vijayakumari, N., Sangeetha, R., & Priya, G. (2020). Fabrication and Characterization of Chitosan-Polypyrrole/Strontium-Magnesium Substituted Hydroxyapatite Biocomposite with Potential Application in Tissue Engineering Scaffolds. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 32(12), 3113–3119. https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2020.22936
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. A.D. Kolb and K.M. Bussard, Cancers, 11, 1020 (2019); https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11071020
  2. A.M. Ferreira, P. Gentile, V. Chiono and G. Ciardelli, Acta Biomater., 8, 3191 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2012.06.014
  3. A. Jaggessar, H. Shahali, A. Mathew and P.K.D.V. Yarlagadda, J. Nanobiotechnol., 15, 64 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-017-0306-1
  4. M. Šupová, Ceram. Int., 41, 9203 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.03.316
  5. Y. Xu, L. An, L. Chen, H. Xu, D. Zeng and G. Wang, Adv. Powder Technol., 29, 1042 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2018.01.008
  6. B. Huang, Y. Yuan, T. Li, S. Ding, W. Zhang, Y. Gu and C. Liu, Sci. Rep., 6, 24323 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1038/srep24323
  7. Z.B. Huang, G.F. Yin, X.M. Liao and J.W. Gu, Front. Mater. Sci., 8, 39 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1007/s11706-014-0238-8
  8. M. Mu, X. Li, A. Tong and G. Guo, Expert Opin. Drug Deliv., 16, 239 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1080/17425247.2019.1580691
  9. M. Zhai, Y. Xu, B. Zhou and W. Jing, J. Photochem. Photobiol. B, 180, 253 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2018.02.018
  10. M.H. Fathi and A. Hanifi, Mater. Lett., 61, 3978 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2007.01.028
  11. M. Mehrabanian and M. Nasr-Esfahani, Int. J. Nanomedicine, 6, 1651 (2011); https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S21203
  12. M.F. Abou Taleb, A. Alkahtani and S.K. Mohamed, Polym. Bull., 72, 725 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-015-1301-z
  13. J. Venkatesan, R. Pallela, I. Bhatnagar and S.-K. Kim, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 51, 1033 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2012.08.020
  14. Y.S. Wei, K.S. Chen and L.T. Wu, J. Inorg. Biochem., 164, 17 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2016.08.007
  15. R. Jolly, A.A. Khan, S.S. Ahmed, S. Alam, S. Kazmi, M. Owais, M.A. Farooqi and M. Shakir, Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 109, 110554 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.110554
  16. J. Zhang, G. Liu, Q. Wu, J. Zuo, Y. Qin and J. Wang, J. Bionics Eng., 9, 243 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(11)60117-0
  17. V. Trakoolwannachai, P. Kheolamai and S. Ummartyotin, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 134, 557 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.05.004
  18. A.G. Santos, G.O. da Rocha and J.B. de Andrade, Sci. Rep., 9, 1 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37186-2
  19. S. Suresh and A. Dakshnamoorthy, Int. J. Phys. Sci., 8, 1639 (2013); https://doi.org/10.5897/IJPS2013.3990
  20. M.A. Nazeer, E. Yilgör and I. Yilgör, Carbohydr. Polym., 175, 38 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.07.054
  21. S. Utara and J. Klinkaewnarong, Ceram. Int., 41, 14860 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.08.018
  22. S. Yalçinkaya, C. Demetgül, M. Timur and N. Çolak, Carbohydr. Polym., 79, 908 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.10.022
  23. L. Pighinelli and M. Kucharska, Carbohydr. Polym., 93, 256 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.06.004
  24. A. Sroka-Bartnicka, L. Borkowski, G. Ginalska, A. Slósarczyk and S.G. Kazarian, Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc., 171, 155 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2016.07.051
  25. J. Han, Z. Zhou, R. Yin, D. Yang and J. Nie, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 46, 199 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2009.11.004
  26. J.Y. Shin, S.J. Jeong and W.K. Lee, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 80, 862 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2019.07.042
  27. L. Du, W. Li, Z. Jiang, L. Wang, D. Kong, B. Xu and M. Zhu, Mater. Lett., 236, 1 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2018.10.040
  28. L. Zhang, B. Song, L. Yang and Y. Shi, Acta Biomater., 112, 298 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2020.05.038
  29. M. Li, Y. Guo, Y. Wei, A.G. MacDiarmid and P.I. Lelkes, Biomaterials, 27, 2705 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.11.037
  30. A. Hasan, G. Waibhaw, V. Saxena and L.M. Pandey, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 111, 923 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.01.089
  31. M. Ezati, H. Safavipour, B. Houshmand and S. Faghihi, Prog. Biomater., 7, 225 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1007/s40204-018-0098-x
  32. F. Shi, J. Li, J. Sun, H. Huang, X. Su and Z. Wang, Talanta, 207, 120341 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2019.120341
  33. S. Braune, A. Lendlein and F. Jung, Hemocompatibility of Biomaterials for Clinical Applications: Blood- iomaterials Interactions,edn 1, Chap.: Part 1-3, pp. 51-76 (2018).
  34. L. Chen, J.M. Mccrate, J.C.M. Lee and H. Li, Nanotechnology, 22, 105708 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/22/10/105708
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0