Issue

Vol. 36 No. 9 (2024): Vol 36 Issue 9, 2024

Copyright (c) 2024 SITI KHATIJAH DERAMAN

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Physical and Chemical Properties of Poly(ethylene)oxide Ternary Solid Polymer Electrolytes Based on Ni/Al Layered Double Hydroxide

https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2024.32010
Siti Nurul 'Afini Mohd Johari
School of Chemistry and Environment, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3007-454X
Siti Khatijah Deraman
Centre of Foundation Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Selangor, Kampus Dengkil 43800 Dengkil, Selangor, Malaysia
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2724-1838
Hussein Hanibah
Centre of Foundation Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Selangor, Kampus Dengkil 43800 Dengkil, Selangor, Malaysia
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5882-1018
Nazrizawati Ahmad Tajuddin
School of Chemistry and Environment, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1980-782X

Corresponding Author(s) : Siti Khatijah Deraman

drsitikhatijah@uitm.edu.my

Asian Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 36 No. 9 (2024): Vol 36 Issue 9, 2024

Abstract

In this work, a solid polymer electrolyte (SPE) was synthesized by solution casting technique using poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) as polymer host doped with lithium trifluoromethanesulfonate (LiCF3SO3) and Ni/Al layered double hydroxide (Ni/Al LDH) as filler. Subsequently, Ni/Al LDH were introduced into the polymer electrolyte and characterized by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) to determine the composition of additive, which gives the highest conductivity for each system. At ambient temperature, the highest conductivity is obtained for the composition PEO–5 wt.% Ni/Al LDH–8 wt.% LiCF3SO3 with a value 8 × 10–6 S cm–1. X-ray diffraction (XRD) studies indicate that the conductivity increase is due to an increase in amorphous content which enhances the segmental flexibility of polymeric chains and the disordered structure of the electrolyte. For composites, the characteristic peaks of Ni/Al LDH disappeared irrespective of filler content. The presence of complexation and interaction among the components was demonstrated by FTIR spectra, while images captured by FESEM revealed the morphological changes in the solid polymer electrolyte.

Keywords

Solid polymer electrolyte Solution casting technique Ionic conductivity Layered double hydroxide Hydrotalcites
Mohd Johari, S. N. ’Afini, Deraman, S. K., Hanibah, H., & Tajuddin, N. A. (2024). Physical and Chemical Properties of Poly(ethylene)oxide Ternary Solid Polymer Electrolytes Based on Ni/Al Layered Double Hydroxide. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 36(9), 2045–2055. https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2024.32010
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. J. Yue, L. Lin, L. Jiang, Q. Zhang, Y. Tong, L. Suo, Y. Hu, H. Li, X. Huang and L. Chen, Adv. Energy Mater., 10, 2000665 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202000665
  2. L. Qiao, X. Judez, T. Rojo, M. Armand and H. Zhang, J. Electrochem. Soc., 167, 070534 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/ab7aa0
  3. M.B. Armand, Ann. Rev. Mater. Sci., 16, 245 (1986); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ms.16.080186.001333
  4. J. Yang, F. Gu and J. Guo, Resour. Conserv. Recycling, 156, 104713 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104713
  5. E. Fan, L. Li, Z. Wang, J. Lin, Y. Huang, Y. Yao, R. Chen and F. Wu, Chem. Rev., 120, 7020 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00535
  6. I. Aldalur, X. Wang, A. Santiago, N. Goujon, M. Echeverría, M. Martínez-Ibáñez, M. Piszcz, P.C. Howlett, M. Forsyth, M. Armand and H. Zhang, J. Power Sources, 448, 227424 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227424
  7. P.V. Wright, Electrochim. Acta, 43, 1137 (1998); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-4686(97)10011-1
  8. B. Jinisha, A.F. Femy, M.S. Ashima and S. Jayalekshmi, Mater. Today Proc., 5, 21189 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2018.06.518
  9. V.P. Hoang Huy, S. So and J. Hur, Nanomaterials, 11, 1 (2021); https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11030614
  10. J.P. Sharma and V. Singh, High Perform. Polym., 32, 142 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1177/0954008319894043
  11. Y. Mallaiah, V.R. Jeedi, R. Swarnalatha, A. Raju, S.N. Reddy and A.S. Chary, J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 155, 110096 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2021.110096
  12. N. Boaretto, L. Meabe, M. Martinez-Ibañez, M. Armand and H. Zhang, J. Electrochem. Soc., 167, 070524 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/ab7221
  13. X. Cheng, J. Pan, Y. Zhao, M. Liao, and H. Peng, Adv. Energy Mater., 8, 1702184 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201702184
  14. S.N. Banitaba, D. Semnani, B. Rezaei and A.A. Ensafi, Polym. Adv. Technol., 30, 1234 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.4556
  15. W.Q. Ding, F. Lv, N. Xu, M.T. Wu, J. Liu and X.P. Gao, ACS Appl. Energy Mater., 4, 4581 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.1c00216
  16. J. Mindemark, M.J. Lacey, T. Bowden and D. Brandell, Prog. Polym. Sci., 81, 114 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2017.12.004
  17. S.N.A.M. Johari, N.A. Tajuddin, H. Hanibah and S.K. Deraman, Int. J. Electrochem. Sci., 16, 211049 (2021); https://doi.org/10.20964/2021.10.53
  18. I.M. Noor, High Perform. Polym., 32, 168 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1177/0954008319890016
  19. L. Valeikiene, R. Paitian, I. Grigoraviciute-Puroniene, K. Ishikawa and A. Kareiva, Mater. Chem. Phys., 237, 121863 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.121863
  20. S.K. Patla, R. Ray, K. Asokan and S. Karmakar, J. Appl. Phys., 123, 125102 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5022050
  21. R. Fang, B. Xu, N.S. Grundish, Y. Xia, Y. Li, C. Lu, Y. Liu, N. Wu and J.B. Goodenough, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 60, 17701 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202106039
  22. S. Wrede, B. Cai, A. Kumar, S. Ott and H. Tian, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 145, 11472 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.3c01333
  23. R. Cuana, T.I. Nasution, H. Agusnar, A. Susilowati, N.S. Lubis and I.S. Pradana, J. Physics: Conf. Ser., 2421, 012038 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2421/1/012038
  24. M. Wang, M.Y. Tan, Y. Zhu, Y. Huang and Y. Xu, NPJ Mater. Degrad., 7, 16 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1038/s41529-023-00332-x
  25. D.R. Joshi and N. Adhikari, J. Pharm. Res. Int., 28, 1 (2019); https://doi.org/10.9734/jpri/2019/v28i330203
  26. M.S. Mustafa, H.O. Ghareeb, S.B. Aziz, M.A. Brza, S. Al-Zangana, J.M. Hadi and M.F.Z. Kadir, Membranes, 10, 116 (2020); https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes10060116
  27. W.S. Young, J.N.L. Albert, A.B. Schantz and T.H. Epps III, Macromolecules, 44, 8116 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1021/ma2013157
  28. P. Pongsuk and J. Pumchusak, Mater. Today Proc., 17, 1956 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.06.241
  29. S. Klongkan and J. Pumchusak, Electrochim. Acta, 161, 171 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2015.02.074
  30. M.R. Johan, O.H. Shy, S. Ibrahim, S.M. Mohd Yassin and T.Y. Hui, Solid State Ion., 196, 41 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2011.06.001
  31. S. Klongkan and J. Pumchusak, Int. J. Chem. Eng. Appl., 6, 165 (2015); https://doi.org/10.7763/IJCEA.2015.V6.474
  32. H.T. Ahmed and O.G. Abdullah, Polymers, 11, 853 (2019); https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11050853
  33. J. Gurusiddappa, W. Madhuri, R. Padma Suvarna and K. Priya Dasan, Mater. Today Proc., 3, 1451 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2016.04.028
  34. A.M. Abdelghany, M.O. Farea and A.H. Oraby, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron., 32, 6538 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-021-05371-1
  35. L. Lin, Y. Zhu, C. Li, L. Liu, D. Surendhiran and H. Cui, Carbohydr. Polym., 198, 225 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.06.092
  36. A.J. Nagajothi, R. Kannan and S. Rajashabala, Mater. Sci. Pol., 36, 185 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1515/msp-2018-0025
  37. P. Dhatarwal and R.J. Sengwa, Polym. Bull., 75, 5645 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-018-2354-6
  38. S. Malhotra and P.K. Varshney, Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res., 10, 108 (2015).
  39. S. Choudhary and R.J. Sengwa, Electrochim. Acta, 247, 924 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2017.07.051
  40. S.M. Mohd Yasin and M.R. Johan, Malays. Nano-Int. J., 1, 1 (2021); https://doi.org/10.22452/mnij.vol1no1.1
  41. P. Dhatarwal and R.J. Sengwa, Ionics, 26, 2259 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-019-03337-2
  42. Z. Lv, S. Yang, H. Zhu, L. Chen, N.S. Alharbi, M. Wakeel, A. Wahid and C. Chen, Appl. Surf. Sci., 448, 599 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.04.162
  43. S.A. Suthanthiraraj and M.K. Vadivel, Appl. Nanosci., 2, 239 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-012-0099-3
  44. C. Bhatt, R. Swaroop, A. Arya and A.L. Sharma, J. Mater. Sci. Eng. B, 5, 418 (2015); https://doi.org/10.17265/2161-6221/2015.11-12.003
  45. N. Taoufik, W. Boumya, A. Elhalil, M. Achak, M. Sadiq, M. Abdennouri and N. Barka, Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem., 103, 712 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2020.1863387
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0