Issue

Vol. 31 No. 8 (2019): Vol 31 Issue 8

Copyright (c) 2019 AJC

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Application of Response Surface Methodology for the Optimization of Essential Oils from Pomelo [Citrus grandis (L.) Osbeck] Leaves using Microwave-Assisted Hydrodistillation Method

https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2019.21768
Tan Phat Dao
NTT Hi-High Institute, Nguyen Tat Thanh University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Thien Hien Tran
NTT Hi-High Institute, Nguyen Tat Thanh University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Duy Trinh Nguyen
NTT Hi-High Institute, Nguyen Tat Thanh University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam; Graduate University of Science and Technology, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam
Duy Chinh Nguyen
NTT Hi-High Institute, Nguyen Tat Thanh University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Dai Hai Nguyen
Graduate University of Science and Technology, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam; Institute of Applied Materials Science, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Nhan Thi Hong Le
Department of Chemical Engineering, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology, VNU-HCM, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Do Trung Sy
Institute of Chemistry, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam
Nguyen Thi Thanh Huong
Institute for Tropical Technology, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam
Bui Le Minh
NTT Hi-High Institute, Nguyen Tat Thanh University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Corresponding Author(s) : Bui Le Minh

blminh@ntt.edu.vn

Asian Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 31 No. 8 (2019): Vol 31 Issue 8

Abstract

Pomelo leaves oil has many applications regarding hair nourishment and stimulation. Recently, new methods of extracting essential oil used have been increasingly developed to replace traditional methods. In this research, maximization of essential oils yield from Citrus grandis was studied by the combination of microwave assisted hydro-distillation (MAHD) and response surface methodology (RSM). We found that the maximum essential oil yield was 0.3197 % with 91.3 % desirability corresponding to factors such as material and water ratiosof 3.04:1, extraction time at 62.76 min and microwave power of 482.17 W. ANOVA analysis for quadratic model also gives favourable outcome including the high determination coefficient (R2 = 0.9443), significant F-value and p-value of coefficients. All these values indicate that this model is significant between experimental and predicted variables.

Keywords

Citrus grandis Pomelo leaves Microwave-Assisted Hydrodistillation Response surface methodology
Dao, T. P., Tran, T. H., Nguyen, D. T., Nguyen, D. C., Nguyen, D. H., Hong Le, N. T., … Minh, B. L. (2019). Application of Response Surface Methodology for the Optimization of Essential Oils from Pomelo [Citrus grandis (L.) Osbeck] Leaves using Microwave-Assisted Hydrodistillation Method. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 31(8), 1639–1642. https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2019.21768
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. T.T. Hien, N.P.T. Nhan, N.D. Trinh, V.T.T. Ho and L.G. Bach, Diffus. Defect Data Solid State Data Pt. B Solid State Phenom., 279, 217 (2018); https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.279.217.
  2. S.N.A. Md Othman, M.A. Hassan, L. Nahar, N. Basar, S. Jamil and S.D. Sarker, Medicines, 3, E13 (2016); https://doi.org/10.3390/medicines3020013.
  3. D.L. Santos, H.D. Ferreira, L.L. Borges, J.R. Paula, L.M.F. Tresvenzol, P.A. Santos, P.H. Ferri, S. de Sá and T.S. Fiuza, Rev. Bras. Farmacogn., 26, 23 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjp.2015.08.008.
  4. N.T. Lan-Phi and T.T. Vy, Int. Food Res. J., 22, 2426 (2015).
  5. S.Q. Liew, G.C. Ngoh, R. Yusoff and W.H. Teoh, Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol., 13, 1 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2017.11.001.
  6. J. Nishad, S.P. Singh, S. Singh, S. Saha, A.K. Dubey, E. Varghese and C. Kaur, Sci. Hortic., 233, 446 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.01.024.
  7. L. Chen, Y. Lai, L. Dong, S. Kang and X. Chen, Microb. Pathog., 113, 365 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2017.11.018.
  8. S.Q. Liew, W.H. Teoh, C.K. Tan, R. Yusoff and G.C. Ngoh, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 116, 128 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.05.013.
  9. M. Borusiewicz, D. Trojanowska, P. Paluchowska, Z. Janeczko, M. W. Petitjean and A. Budak, Sci. Asia, 43, 96 (2017); https://doi.org/10.2306/scienceasia1513-1874.2017.43.096.
  10. G. Khalili, A. Mazloomifar, K. Larijani, M.S. Tehrani and P.A. Azar, Ind. Crops Prod., 119, 214 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.04.021.
  11. R. Manouchehri, M.J. Saharkhiz, A. Karami and M. Niakousari, Sustain. Chem. Pharm., 8, 76 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scp.2018.03.002.
  12. Z. Liu, Y. Zu and L. Yang, Food Chem., 224, 172 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.12.027.
  13. M. Gavahian, A. Farahnaky, R. Farhoosh, K. Javidnia and F. Shahidi, Food Bioprod. Process., 94, 50 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbp.2015.01.003.
  14. T. Van Tran, Q.T.P. Bui, T.D. Nguyen, N.T.H. Le and L.G. Bach, Adsorpt. Sci. Technol., 35, 72 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1177/0263617416669152.
  15. T.V. Tran, D.T. Nguyen, V.T.T. Ho, P.Q.H. Hoang, P.Q Bui and L.G. Bach, J. Mater. Environ. Sci., 8, 426 (2017).
  16. T. Van Tran, Q.T.P. Bui, T.D. Nguyen, V.T.T. Ho and L.G. Bach, Water Sci. Technol., 75, 2047 (2017); https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2017.066.
  17. L.G. Bach, T. Van Tran, T.D. Nguyen, T. Van Pham and S.T. Do, Res. Chem. Intermed., 44, 1661 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1007/s11164-017-3191-1.
  18. H.S. Kusuma and M. Mahfud, Period. Polytech. Chem. Eng., 61, 82 (2017); https://doi.org/10.3311/PPch.8676.
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0