Issue

Vol. 36 No. 6 (2024): Vol 36 Issue 6, 2024

Copyright (c) 2024 ROSLAILI YUHANIS RAMLI

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Limiting Molar Conductivity Dynamics of κcar/PEO/NaClO4 Aqueous Electrolyte System at Different Temperature

https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2024.31576
Roslaili Yuhanis Binti Ramli
Faculty of Applied Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 47000 Shah Alam, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia; Kolej Matrikulasi Selangor, 42700 Banting, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7507-8265
Hussein Hanibah
Centre of Foundation Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 43800 Dengkil, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5882-1018
Nor Zakiah Binti Nor Hashim
Centre of Foundation Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 43800 Dengkil, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9878-2113
Intan Juliana Binti Shamsudin
Centre for Foundation Studies, Universiti Pertahanan Nasional Malaysia, UPNM, 57000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6493-7458

Corresponding Author(s) : Roslaili Yuhanis Binti Ramli

roslaili.ramlee@gmail.com

Asian Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 36 No. 6 (2024): Vol 36 Issue 6, 2024

Abstract

The limiting molar conductivity behaviour (Λo) of κcar/PEO/NaClO4 blend liquid electrolyte systems in aqueous solution at 20 and 25 ºC was studied. The ionic conductivity (κ) of the electrolyte system was measured using Mettler Toledo Seven Compact S230 AC conductivity meter. The κ of the electrolyte was measured at a range of salt concentration, Csalt (10-5-10-8) and at different polymer concentration, Cpoly (0.001-0.003 g cm-3). The data analysis showed a directly proportion relation between Λo and Cpoly, which indicates a decrease in total salt dissociation (α) and consequently, an increase in the formation of ion pairing occurs due to the increase in salt dissociation and less dynamic volume. In addition, a direct relation between Λo and temperature was also observed. An increase in temperature causes a decrease in the total ion pairing while increase the ion movement.

Keywords

Molar conductivity Carrageenan Polyethylene oxide Sodium perchlorate Electrolyte
Ramli, R. Y. B., Hanibah, H., Nor Hashim, N. Z. B., & Shamsudin, I. J. B. (2024). Limiting Molar Conductivity Dynamics of κcar/PEO/NaClO4 Aqueous Electrolyte System at Different Temperature. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 36(6), 1377–1382. https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2024.31576
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. S. Renault, S. Gottis, A.-L. Barrès, M. Courty, O. Chauvet, F. Dolhembd and P. Poizot, Energy Environ. Sci., 6, 2124 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ee40878g
  2. P.K. Varshney and S. Gupta, Ionics, 17, 479 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-011-0563-1
  3. M. Rayung, M.M. Aung, S.C. Azhar, L.C. Abdullah, M.S. Su’ait, A. Ahmad and S.N.A.M. Jamil, Materials, 13, 838 (2020); https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13040838
  4. M.B. Armand, Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci., 16, 245 (1986); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ms.16.080186.001333
  5. K.S. Ngai, S. Ramesh, K. Ramesh and J.C. Juan, Ionics, 22, 1259 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-016-1756-4
  6. F.N. Jumaah, N.N. Mobarak, A. Ahmad, M.A. Ghani and M.Y.A. Rahman, Ionics, 21, 1311 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-014-1306-x
  7. R. Zakaria and A.M.M. Ali, Scientific Res. J., 17, 119 (2020); https://doi.org/10.24191/srj.v17i2.7266
  8. T. Bhattacharyya, C.S. Palla, D.H. Dethe and Y.M. Joshi, Food Hydrocoll., 146, 109298 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2023.109298
  9. S.W. Chan, H. Mirhosseini, F.S. Taip, T.C. Ling and C.P. Tan, Food Hydrocoll., 30, 581 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2012.07.010
  10. J. Guo, X. Shang, P. Chen and X. Huang, Carbohydr. Polym., 302, 120374 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.120374
  11. J. Necas and L. Bartosikova, Veterinární Medicína, 58, 187 (2013); https://doi.org/10.17221/6758-vetmed
  12. Y.W. Wardhana, N. Aanisah, I. Sopyan, R. Hendriani and A.Y. Chaerunisaa, Gels, 8, 752 (2022); https://doi.org/10.3390/gels8110752
  13. W.A.K. Mahmood, M.M.R. Khan and T.C. Yee, J. Phys. Sci., 25, 123 (2014).
  14. N.N. Mobarak, N. Ramli, A. Ahmad and M.Y.A. Rahman, Solid State Ion., 224, 51 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2012.07.010
  15. C.P. Rhodes, Ph.D. Thesis, Crysalline and Amorphous Phases in Polymer Electrolytes and Model Systems, University of Oklahoma, USA (2001).
  16. M. Marzantowicz, J.R. Dygas, F. Krok, Z. Florjañczyk and E. Zygadlo-Monikowska, J. Non-crystalline Solids, 352, 5216 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2006.02.161
  17. Z. Xue, D. He and X. Xie, J. Mater. Chem. A Mater. Energy Sustain., 3, 19218 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TA03471J
  18. A. Arya and A.L. Sharma, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron., 29, 17903 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-018-9905-3
  19. H.T. Ahmed and O. Gh, Polymers, 11, 853 (2019); https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11050853
  20. S.N.A.M. Johari, N.A. Tajuddin, H. Hanibah and S.K. Deraman, Int. J. Electrochem. Sci., 16, 211049 (2021); https://doi.org/10.20964/2021.10.53
  21. W.R. Blakemore and A.R. Harpell, Carrageenan, In: Food Stabilisers, Thickeners and Gelling Agents, Blackwell Publishing Ltd., pp. 73–94 (2019).
  22. M.A.M. Tajudin, H. Hanibah and D. Darji, Asian J. Chem., 35, 3111 (2023); https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2023.30627
  23. H. Hanibah, A. Ahmad and N.H. Hassan, AIP Conf. Proc., 1614, 295 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4895211
  24. N.T.M. Balakrishnan, A. Das, J.D. Joyner, M.J.J. Fatima, L.R. Raphael, A. Pullanchiyodan and P. Raghavan, Mater. Today Chem., 29, 101407 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtchem.2023.101407
  25. H. Hanibah, Ph.D. Thesis, Salt-Polymer-Solvent Ternary Electrolyte System: Salt Solubility and Ion Mobility of LiClO4 in Polymer Solution, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (2015).
  26. S. Chen, Y. Chen, X. Mu, P. Wang, L. Miao, S. Tanemura and H. Cai, Sustainable Mater. Technol., 36, e00635 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susmat.2023.e00635
  27. W.M. Haynes, CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, Taylor & Francis Ltd., edn 95 (2014).
  28. M.S. Ding, K. Xu, S.S. Zhang, K. Amine, G.L. Henriksen and T.R. Jow, J. Electrochem. Soc., 148, A1196 (2001); https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1403730
  29. S.I. Smedley, The Interpretation of Ionic Conductivity in Liquids, Springer Science & Business Media (2012).
  30. M.S. Zainudin Ithnin, H. Hanibah, S.K. Navaratnam and F.W. Azman, Malaysian J. Chem., 25, 108 (2023); https://doi.org/10.55373/mjchem.v25i4.99
  31. H. Hanibah, N.Z.N. Hashim and I.J. Shamsudin, AIP Conf. Proc., 1877, 050003 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4999877
  32. A. Szczêsna-Chrzan, M. Vogler, P. Yan, G.Z. Zukowska, C. Wölke, A. Ostrowska, S. Szymanska, M. Marcinek, M. Winter, I. Cekic-Laskovic, W. Wieczorek and H.S. Stein, J. Mater. Chem. A Mater. Energy Sustain., 11, 13483 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1039/d3ta01217d
  33. M.S. Ding and T.R. Jow, J. Electrochem. Soc., 151, A2007 (2004); https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1809575
  34. J.Y. Tae, L.A. Patel, M.J. Vigil, K.A. Maerzke, A.T. Findikoglu and R.P. Currier, J. Chem. Phys., 151, (2019); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5128671
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0