Issue

Vol. 36 No. 7 (2024): Vol 36 Issue 7, 2024

Copyright (c) 2024 Rubavathi Anandan, Visali Kannan, Venkatajothi Ramarao , Murugan A

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Production of Oleic Acid from Mango Kernels Waste using Probiotic Bacteria Isolated from Marine Fishes

https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2024.31515
Rubavathi Anandan
Department of Microbiology, Periyar University, Salem-636011, India
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8396-3907
Visali Kannan
Department of Microbiology, Periyar University, Salem-636011, India
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9790-9656
Lavanya Sivakumar
Department of Microbiology, Periyar University, Salem-636011, India
Venkatajothi Ramarao
Department of Medical Microbiology, Basic Medical Sciences, Michael Chilufya Sata School of Medicine, The Copperbelt University, Ndola, Zambia
https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2856-9207
Murugan Athiappan
Department of Microbiology, Periyar University, Salem-636011, India
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0419-4941

Corresponding Author(s) : Murugan Athiappan

amuruganpu@gmail.com

Asian Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 36 No. 7 (2024): Vol 36 Issue 7, 2024

Abstract

Oleic acid is a mono-unsaturated omega-9 fatty acid that serves as an antioxidant, antibacterial, antidiabetic, anti-inflammatory, anticancer and antidepressive agents. The present study focused on the production of oleic acid from mango kernel waste as an alternate method for conventional chemical extraction. An alternate mechanism has been devised to synthesize oleic acid from agro-industrial waste using probiotic bacteria and has been found to be economical. Microbial production of oleic acid from kernels discharged as waste from mango pulp processing industrial waste is a typical example of the valorization. The results of the present study demonstrated 5.26 mg/100 mL of oleic acid production using gut bacterial isolates from marine fish. Optimization of oleic acid production with response surface methodology by using Design-Expert has shown 40 mg/100 mL at pH 6.0, 15 ºC and 25 g concentration of mango kernel substrate with 48 h of incubation. The oleic acid produced using gut bacteria have been confirmed with the GC-MS fatty acid methyl ester. Therapeutic applications of oleic acids like antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and antibacterial activities were found to be promising.

Keywords

Oleic acid Mango kernel Probiotic bacteria Anti-inflammatory
Anandan, R., Kannan, V., Sivakumar, L., Ramarao, V., & Athiappan, M. (2024). Production of Oleic Acid from Mango Kernels Waste using Probiotic Bacteria Isolated from Marine Fishes. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 36(7), 1511–1517. https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2024.31515
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. M.I. Covas, Pharmacol. Res., 55, 175 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2007.01.010
  2. J.L. Alves, A.S.C. Figueira, M. Souto, I.L. Lopes, J.C. Dionísio, R.M. Quinta-Ferreira and M.E. Quinta-Ferreira, Energy Rep., 6(Suppl. 1), 885 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2019.11.034
  3. D. Casares, P.V. Escribá and C.A. Rosselló, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 20, 2167 (2019); https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20092167
  4. M.A. Fowomola, Afr. J. Food Sci., 4, 472 (2010).
  5. C. Santa-María, S. López-Enríquez, S. Montserrat-de la Paz, I. Geniz, M.E. Reyes-Quiroz, M. Moreno, F. Palomares, F. Sobrino and G. Alba, Nutrients, 15, 224 (2023); https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15010224
  6. S. Kittiphoom, Int. Food Res. J., 19, 1325 (2012).
  7. K.K. Yadav, N. Garg, A. Verma, S. Kumar and M. Trivedi, Indian J. Agric. Sci., 87, 943 (2017); https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v87i7.71925
  8. E.F. Delong and A.A. Yayanos, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 51, 730 (1986); https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.51.4.730-737.1986
  9. R. Subramaniyam and R. Vimala, Int. J. Nat. Sci., 3, 480 (2012).
  10. A.M. Gad, E.A. Beltagy, U.M. Abdul-Raouf, M.A. El-Shenawy and S.S. Abouelkheir, Chem. Adv. Mater., 1, 41 (2016).
  11. M.A. Bezerra, R.E. Santelli, E.P. Oliveira, L.S. Villar and L.A. Escaleira, Talanta, 76, 965 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2008.05.019
  12. J. Ryan, H. Farr, S. Visnovsky, M. Vyssotski and G.A. Visnovsky, J. Microbiol. Methods, 82, 49 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2010.04.001
  13. E.S. Bindiya, K.J. Tina, S.S. Raghul and S.G. Bhat, Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins, 7, 157 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-015-9190-x
  14. N. Buntin, S. Chanthachum and T. Hongpattarakere, J. Sci. Technol., 30, 141 (2008).
  15. J.P. Dworzanski, L. Berwald and H.L.C. Meuzelaar, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 56, 1717 (1990); https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.56.6.1717-1724.1990
  16. A.A. Gharaibeh and K.J. Voorhees, Anal. Chem., 68, 2805 (1996); https://doi.org/10.1021/ac9600767
  17. S. Bandhu, D. Dasgupta, J. Akhter, P. Kanaujia, S.K. Suman, D. Agrawal, S. Kaul, D.K. Adhikari and D. Ghosh, Springerplus, 3, 691 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-691
  18. P. Sanap, D. Sonawane, S. Patil and A. Pratap, Ind. Crops Prod., 188, 115711 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.115711
  19. L.R. Laureles, F.M. Rodriguez, C.E. Reano, G.A. Santos, A.C. Laurena and E.M.T. Mendoza, J. Agric. Food Chem., 50, 1581 (2002); https://doi.org/10.1021/jf010832w
  20. K. Kara, F. Ouanji, E.M. Lotfi, M.E. Mahi, M. Kacimi and M. Ziyad, J. Egypt. Pet., 27, 249 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpe.2017.07.010
  21. T. Kuda, M. Tsunekawa, H. Goto and Y. Araki., J. Food Compos. Anal., 18, 625 (2005); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2004.06.015
  22. A. Kicel, A. Owczarek, P. Gralak, P. Ciszewski and M.A. Olszewska, Phytochem. Lett., 30, 349 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytol.2019.02.027
  23. G. Casillas-Vargas, C. Ocasio-Malavé, S. Medina, C. Morales-Guzmán, R.G. Del Valle, N.M. Carballeira and D.J. Sanabria-Ríos, Prog. Lipid Res., 81, 101093 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plipres.2021.101093
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0