Issue

Vol. 36 No. 7 (2024): Vol 36 Issue 7, 2024

Copyright (c) 2024 Dr. PALANISAMY P

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Phytochemical Evaluation, Molecular Docking, ADMET Properties and Anticancer Activity of Ethanolic Extract of Solanum trilobatum Leaf Extract

https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2024.31413
D. Abilasha
Department of Chemistry & Research Centre, Pioneer Kumaraswamy College (Affiliated to Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, Abishekapatti, Tirunelveli), Nagercoil-629003, India
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8172-0947
P. Palanisamy
Department of Chemistry & Research Centre, Pioneer Kumaraswamy College (Affiliated to Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, Abishekapatti, Tirunelveli), Nagercoil-629003, India
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6679-1381

Corresponding Author(s) : P. Palanisamy

ppschem08@gmail.com

Asian Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 36 No. 7 (2024): Vol 36 Issue 7, 2024

Abstract

In this study, the anticancer potential of ethanolic extract of Solanum trilobatum leaf, which contained high quantities of alkaloids, terpenoids, steroids and flavonoids, was investigated. The GC-MS analysis detected 30 phytocompounds in the ethanolic extract and according to the Pubchem database, 10 of these phytocompounds have significant biological activity. When using AutoDock Vina, docking investigations were conducted using the cancer cell line proteins from the colon (5FGK) and cervical (4J96), respectively. ADMET predictions were made via SwissADME and the pkCSM online webserver. According to the molecular docking data, the phytocompound stigmasterol has better anticancer activity than reference drugs. Molecular docking studies found that stigmasterol had a higher docking score (-10.8 kcal/mol for 5FGK and -8.0 kcal/mol for 4J96) and more binding interaction than camptothecin. Silica gel column chromatography was used to isolate stigmasterol, which was afterwards characterized by IR, PMR, CMR, mass spectroscopy and elemental analysis. MTT tests comparing stigmasterol revealed the moderate efficacy (IC50 = 83.14 µg/mL HeLa & 115.23 µg/mL HCT116) than the reference drugs camptothecin (IC50 = 38.07 µg/mL HeLa & 72.51 µg/mL HCT116). These results indicated stigmasterol as a potential therapeutic option which is compatible with the traditional use of plant and and these findings have been supported by molecular docking and ADME properties.

Keywords

Solanum trilobatum leaf Ethanol extract GC-MS analysis Molecular docking study ADMET Anticancer activity
Abilasha, D., & Palanisamy, P. (2024). Phytochemical Evaluation, Molecular Docking, ADMET Properties and Anticancer Activity of Ethanolic Extract of Solanum trilobatum Leaf Extract. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 36(7), 1489–1496. https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2024.31413
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. F. Peng, M. Liao, R. Qin, S. Zhu, C. Peng, L. Fu, Y. Chen and B. Han, Sig. Transduct. Target Ther., 7, 286 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-022-01110-y
  2. R.B. Mokhtari, T.S. Homayouni, N. Baluch, E. Morgatskaya, S. Kumar, B. Das and H. Yeger, Oncotarget, 8, 38022 (2017); https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.16723
  3. M.M. Gottesman, T. Fojo and S.E. Bates, Nat. Rev. Cancer, 2, 48 (2002); https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc706
  4. Y. Unno, Y. Shino, F. Kondo, N. Igarashi, R. Shimura, T. Yamaguchi, G. Wang, T. Asano, H. Saisho, S. Sekiya and H. Shirasawa, Clin. Cancer Res., 11, 4553 (2005); https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-2610
  5. N. Chaachouay and L. Zidane, Drugs Drug Cand., 3, 184 (2024); https://doi.org/10.3390/ddc3010011
  6. O. Oyebode, N.-B. Kandala, P.J. Chilton and R.J. Lilford, Health Policy Plan, 31, 984 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czw022
  7. A.L. Harvey, Trends Pharmacol. Sci., 20, 196 (1999); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-6147(99)01346-2
  8. H. Xu, L. Yao, H. Sun and Y. Wu, Carbohydr. Polym., 78, 316 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.04.007
  9. S. Mushtaq, B.H. Abbasi, B. Uzair and R. Abbasi, Excli J., 17, 420 (2018); https://doi.org/10.17179/excli2018-1174
  10. P. Wangchuk, J. Biol. Active Prod. Nature, 8, 1 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1080/22311866.2018.1426495
  11. K.S.Z. Ahmed, S.Z.A. Sidhra, P. Ponmurugan and B. Senthil Kumar, Pak. J. Pharm. Sci., 29, 1571 (2016).
  12. M. Pratheeba, K.U. Rani and B. Ramesh, Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res., 7, 213 (2014).
  13. P. Balakrishnan, T.A.M. Gani, S. Subrahmanyam and K. Shanmugam, J. Chem. Pharm. Res., 7, 507 (2015).
  14. Radha, R, Sermakkani, M, Thangapandian V, Int. J. Pharm. Life Sci., 2, 562 (2011).
  15. A.C. Kumoro, M. Hasan and H. Singh, Sci. Asia, 35, 306 (2009); https://doi.org/10.2306/scienceasia1513-1874.2009.35.306
  16. R.N.S. Yadav and M. Agarwala, J. Phytology, 3, 10 (2011).
  17. S. Stephen, Anal. Chem., 84, 7274 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1021/ac301205z
  18. H.J. Hubschmann, Handbook of GC-MS: Fundamentals and Applications, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA: Weinheim, Germany, edn. 3 (2015).
  19. A.D. Elmezayen, A. Al-Obaidi, A.T. Sahin and K. Yelekçi, J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn., 39, 2980 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2020.1758791
  20. A.R. Martin, M. Kanai, Y. Kamatani, Y. Okada, B.M. Neale and M.J. Daly, Nat. Genet., 51, 584 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-019-0379-x
  21. L. Martin, M.P. White, A. Hunt, M. Richardson, S. Pahl and J. Burt, J. Environ. Psychol., 68, 101389 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101389
  22. S. Narramore, C.E. Stevenson, A. Maxwell, D.M. Lawson and C.W. Fishwick, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 27, 3546 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2019.06.015
  23. M.C. Alley, D.A. Scudiere, A. Monks, M. Czerwinski, R.I.I. Shoemaker and M.R. Boyd, Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res., 27, 389 (1986).
  24. T. Mosmann, J. Immunol. Methods, 65, 55 (1983); https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4
  25. L. Preethi, N. Ganamurali, D. Dhanasekaran and S. Sabarathinam, Obes. Med., 24, 100346 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obmed.2021.100346
  26. S. Chidambaram, M.A. El-Sheikh, A.H. Alfarhan, S. Radhakrishnan and I. Akbar, Saudi J. Biol. Sci., 28, 1100 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.11.038
  27. V.K. Singh, N. Kumar and R. Chandra, Adv. Biotechnol. Biochem., 2, 119 (2017).
  28. A. Daina and V. Zoete, ChemMedChem, 11, 1117 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1002/cmdc.201600182
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0