Issue

Vol. 36 No. 7 (2024): Vol 36 Issue 7, 2024

Copyright (c) 2024 Ngoc Bich Hoang, Anh Duc Phung, Thi Cam Quyen Ngo, Thi Tuu Tran, Van Tan Lam, Chi Sy phung, Thi Kim Ngan Tran

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Removal of Methylene Blue by Activated Carbon from Jackfruit: Kinetic, Isothermal Evaluation and Optimization Using by Response Surface Methodology

https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2024.31286
Bich Ngoc Hoang
Institute of Applied Technology and Sustainable Development, Nguyen Tat Thanh University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0513-5823
Thi Cam Quyen Ngo
Institute of Applied Technology and Sustainable Development, Nguyen Tat Thanh University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0115-5528
Lam Van Tan
Ben Tre Department of Science and Technology, Ben Tre Province, Vietnam
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4799-2150
Thi Kim Ngan Tran
Institute of Applied Technology and Sustainable Development, Nguyen Tat Thanh University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-4851
Thi Tuu Tran
Institute of Applied Technology and Sustainable Development, Nguyen Tat Thanh University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam
https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2733-4827
Sy Chi Phung
Institute of Applied Technology and Sustainable Development, Nguyen Tat Thanh University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4653-680X
Anh Duc Phung
Institute of Applied Technology and Sustainable Development, Nguyen Tat Thanh University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam

Corresponding Author(s) : Bich Ngoc Hoang

bichhn@ntt.edu.vn

Asian Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 36 No. 7 (2024): Vol 36 Issue 7, 2024

Abstract

Activated carbons derived from the byproducts of jackfruit processing, specifically the skin (peel) and pulp, were prepared using the chemical assisted microwave irradiation method. The structural and physical properties were evaluated based on the results of scanning electron microscope, X-ray diffraction patterns, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, Brunauer–Emmett–Teller theory analysis. The results have shown that activated carbon from jackfruit skin and activated carbon from jackfruit pulp have a honeycomb shape with a surface area of 268 m2 g-1 and 309 m2 g-1, respectively. Both samples showed the presence of specific functional groups such as C=C, C=O, O–H and C–H. It can be seen that the material structure was semi-crystalline and clearly shown in the 2θ value ranges which are 2θ = 20-35º and 40-45º. Specifically, 2θ = 20-35º represents the structural characteristics of the carbon or graphite lattice. Factors that influence the removal of methylene blue that have been evaluated which include adsorption time, solution pH, ambient temperature, activated carbon dosage, dye concentration and optimization by the response surface methodology model. The parameters for the adsorption process are optimized from the response surface methodology model with activated carbon from jackfruit pulp (pH 8.97, concentration of 50.5 mg L-1, dosage of 0.57 g L-1, time 120 min, temperature 30 ºC, the adsorption capacity of 90.82 mg g-1, adsorption efficiency 100%) and activated carbon from Jackfruit skin (pH 8.61, concentration 52 mg L-1, dosage 0.57 g L-1, time 120 min, temperature 30 ºC, adsorption capacity 94.04 mg g-1, adsorption efficiency 100%), respectively. The adsorption process shows that activated carbon from jackfruit pulp (ACJP) follows the pseudo-second order and Langmuir model and activated carbon from jackfruit skin (peel) (ACJS) follows the model of Bangham and Langmuir. The adsorption process is predicted with many mechanisms, including chemical interactions, multilayer adsorption and diffusion. The materials showed application potential as the reusability was three times.

Keywords

Activated carbon Methylene blue Response surface methodology Jackfruit Kinetic Isothermal
Hoang, B. N., Ngo, T. C. Q., Tan, L. V., Tran, T. K. N., Tran, T. T., Phung, S. C., & Phung, A. D. (2024). Removal of Methylene Blue by Activated Carbon from Jackfruit: Kinetic, Isothermal Evaluation and Optimization Using by Response Surface Methodology. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 36(7), 1470–1482. https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2024.31286
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. A.U. Khan, I.J. Ema, M.R. Faruk, S.A. Tarapder, A.U. Khan, S. Noreen and M. Adnan, J. Multidiscip. Appl. Nat. Sci., 1, 106 (2021); https://doi.org/10.47352/jmans.v1i2.88
  2. A. Witt and Q. Luke, Guide to the Naturalized and Invasive Plants of Eastern Africa, UK: CABI (2017).
  3. J.R. Rajabathar, S. Manoharan, J.V. J, H.A. Al-Lohedan and P. Arunachalam, J. Energy Storage, 32, 101735 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2020.101735
  4. M.S. Baliga, A.R. Shivashankara, R. Haniadka, J. Dsouza and H.P. Bhat, Food Res. Int., 44, 1800 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2011.02.035
  5. O. Prakash, R. Kumar, A. Mishra and R. Gupta, Pharmacogn. Rev., 3, 353 (2009).
  6. V. Shinde, C.D. Pawar, O.S. Warang, V.S. Dandekar, M.M. Kulkarni, J. J and M.S. Joshi, Int. J. Chem. Stud., 9, 2710 (2021); https://doi.org/10.22271/chemi.2021.v9.i1al.11636
  7. S. Meethal, N. Kaur, J. Singh and Y. Gat, Curr. Res. Nutr. Food Sci., 5, 154 (2017); https://doi.org/10.12944/CRNFSJ.5.2.12
  8. K. Das and A. Saha, J. Medicinal Plants Studies, 8, 101 (2020); https://doi.org/10.33545/26631067.2020.v2.i2a.42
  9. R. Felli, T.A. Yang, W.N. Wan Abdullah and W. Zzaman, Trop. Life Sci. Res., 29, 113 (2018); https://doi.org/10.21315/tlsr2018.29.1.8
  10. M. Rengasamy, R.V. Raj and N. Vedagiriswaran, Elixir Renewable Energy, 102, 44269 (2017).
  11. R. Shamsudin, C.S. Ling, C.N. Ling, N. Muda and O. Hassan, J. Appl. Sci., 9, 3202 (2009); https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2009.3202.3204
  12. A.A. Sundarraj and T.V. Ranganathan, Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Res., 9, 1000 (2018).
  13. K. Subburamu, M. Singaravelu, A. Nazar and I. Irulappan, Bioresour. Technol., 40, 85 (1992); https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-8524(92)90125-H
  14. M. Duque-Acevedo, L.J. Belmonte-Ureña, F.J. Cortés-García and F. Camacho-Ferre, Glob. Ecol. Conserv., 22, e00902 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e00902
  15. K.N.T. Tran, B.N. Hoang, K.O.T. Nguyen, H.T.T. Nguyen, S.C. Phung, H.T. Do and C.Q.T. Ngo, Indonesian J. Chem., 22, 565 (2021); https://doi.org/10.22146/ijc.69538
  16. M.F. Abbod, J.W.F. Catto, D.A. Linkens and F.C. Hamdy, J. Urol., 178, 1150 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.122
  17. N. Abbas, M. Hussain, N. Russo and G. Saracco, Chem. Eng. J., 175, 330 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.09.115
  18. M. Ashokkumar and P. Arunachalam, Appl. Catal. A Gen., 555, 47 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2018.02.010
  19. H. Guan, H. Wang, Y. Zhang, C. Dong, G. Chen, Y. Wang and J. Xie, Appl. Surf. Sci., 447, 261 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.03.225
  20. A. Nayak, B. Bhushan, V. Gupta and S. Kotnala, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 100, 134 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2021.05.028
  21. D. Prahas, Y. Kartika, N. Indraswati and S. Ismadji, Chem. Eng. J., 140, 32 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2007.08.032
  22. R. Gokulan, G.G. Prabhu and J. Jegan, Int. J. Phytoremediation, 21, 1179 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2019.1612845
  23. M.F. Mohamad Yusop, A.Z. Abdullah and M.A. Ahmad, Diamond Rel. Mater., 136, 109991 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2023.109991
  24. V. Parimelazhagan, K. Natarajan, S. Shanbhag, S. Madivada and H.S. Kumar, Chem. Eng., 7, 31 (2023); https://doi.org/10.3390/chemengineering7020031
  25. P. Vairavel, N. Rampal and G. Jeppu, Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem., 103, 2789 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2021.1897982
  26. V. Parimelazhagan, P. Yashwath, D.A. Pushparajan and J. Carpenter, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 23, 12484 (2022); https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232012484
  27. V. Chandanshive, S. Kadam, N. Rane, B.-H. Jeon, J. Jadhav and S. Govindwar, Chemosphere, 252, 126513 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126513
  28. M.F. Mohamad Yusop, M.N. Nasehir Khan, R. Zakaria, A.Z. Abdullah and M.A. Ahmad, Arab. J. Chem., 16, 104780 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2023.104780
  29. H. Li, L. Liu, J. Cui, J. Cui, F. Wang and F. Zhang, RSC Adv., 10, 14262 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RA01245A
  30. I. Khan, K. Saeed, I. Zekker, B. Zhang, A.H. Hendi, A. Ahmad, S. Ahmad, N. Zada, H. Ahmad, L.A. Shah, T. Shah and I. Khan, Water, 14, 242 (2022); https://doi.org/10.3390/w14020242
  31. M.T. Yagub, T.K. Sen, S. Afroze and H.M. Ang, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 209, 172 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2014.04.002
  32. A. Asfaram, M. Ghaedi, S. Hajati, M. Rezaeinejad, A. Goudarzi and M.K. Purkait, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng., 53, 80 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2015.02.026
  33. E. Altintig, H. Altundag, M. Tuzen and A. Sari, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 122, 151 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2017.03.035
  34. M. Das and C. Mishra, SN Appl. Sci., 1, 483 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-0459-7
  35. K.Y. Foo and B.H. Hameed, Bioresour. Technol., 112, 143 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.01.178
  36. N.T.C. Quyen, T.L. Van, L.G. Bach and B.N. Hoang, Key Eng. Mater., 949, 175 (2023); https://doi.org/10.4028/p-VfN0Z5
  37. B.N. Hoang, T.T. Nguyen, Q.P.T. Bui, L.G. Bach, D.-V.N. Vo, C.D. Trinh, X.-T. Bui and T.D. Nguyen, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 137, 48904 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1002/app.48904
  38. N.H. Bich, T.N. Thuong, V.N. Dai and V.T. Lam, Mater. Today Proc., 38, 3046 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.09.391
  39. T.T. Nguyen, B.N. Hoang, T.V. Tran, D.V. Nguyen, T.D. Nguyen and D.-V.N. Vo, Surf. Interfaces, 26, 101410 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2021.101410
  40. P. Vairavel and V. Ramachandra Murty, Desalination Water Treat., 103, 84 (2018); https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2018.21799
  41. X. Ge, Z. Wu, Z. Wu, Y. Yan, G. Cravotto and B.-C. Ye, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 39, 27 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2016.05.003
  42. M.Z. Hossain, W. Wu, W.Z. Xu, M.B.I. Chowdhury, A.K. Jhawar, D. Machin and P.A. Charpentier, C, 4, 38 (2018); https://doi.org/10.3390/c4030038
  43. B. Bhushan, A. Nayak and S. Kotnala, Mater. Today Proc., 44, 187 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.554
  44. L. Ramasamy and L.R. Miranda, Adsorpt. Sci. Technol., 2022, 4129833 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4129833
  45. L. Xie, Y. Meng, Q. Wang, G. Zhang, H. Xie and G. Zhou, Diamond Rel. Mater., 130, 109474 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2022.109474
  46. X. Zhang, Y. Wang, J. Cai, K. Wilson and A.F. Lee, Energy Environ. Mater., 3, 453 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1002/eem2.12074
  47. Y. Zhu, B. Yi, Q. Yuan, Y. Wu, M. Wang and S. Yan, RSC Adv., 8, 19917 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RA03018A
  48. H. Dadkhah and M.A. Behnajady, Chem. Eng. Commun., 206, 398 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1080/00986445.2018.1494581
  49. X. Ma, S. Tian, X. Li, H. Fan and S. Fu, Cellulose, 28, 8027 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-021-03989-2
  50. A.C. Fingolo, B.C. Klein, M.C.A.F. Rezende, C.A. Silva e Souza, J. Yuan, G. Yin, A. Bonomi, D.S.T. Martinez and M. Strauss, Waste Biomass Valoriz., 11, 1 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-019-00774-y
  51. C.D. Sulistiyo, K.-C. Cheng, H.J. Su’andi, M. Yuliana, C.-W. Hsieh, S. Ismadji, A.E. Angkawijaya, A.W. Go, H.Y. Hsu, P.L. Tran-Nguyen and S.P. Santoso, J. Clean. Prod., 380, 135010 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135010
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0