Copyright (c) 2018 AJC
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Behaviour of Fipronil in Paddy Field Ecosystem
Corresponding Author(s) : Malvika Kadian
Asian Journal of Chemistry,
Vol. 30 No. 5 (2018): Vol 30 Issue 5, 2018
Abstract
Under normal environmental conditions, fipronil insecticide degrades into a number of metabolites like fipronil sulfone, sulfide, desulfinyl, etc. They can persist in environment for longer duration and can have adverse effect on soil, water bodies along-with persistence of residuals in edibles and other plant by-products like straw. In order to evaluate the impact of using fipronil in paddy field ecosystem and to provide basic information for its degradation behavior, a field experiment was done by applying the insecticide @ 56 and 112 g a.i./ha following standard agronomic conditions. Soil and water samples were collected periodically. Paddy grain, husk and straw samples were collected at harvest. Fipronil residues were analyzed by GC-MS tandem mass spectrometry. In soil, more than 48 % residues degraded in 7 days and reached below detectable limit after 49 days with half-life period of 9.29 and 10.13 days at two doses showing degradation rate to be biphasic with first order kinetics. In field water, residues reached below detectable limit on 49th day at single dose with half-life period of 14.71 days where as at double dose application, 91.52 % fipronil was found dissipated on 49th day after application with half-life period of 14.31 days. In rice grains, husk and straw, fipronil residues were found below MRL at single dose.
Keywords
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)BibTeX
- https://www.indiastat.com/2016.
- World Wheat: FAPRI 2005. Agricultural Outlook, pp. 148 (2005).
- C.D.S. Tomlin, The Pesticide Manual. The British Crop Protection Council, Surrey, UK, pp. 413 (2000).
- A. Aajoud, P. Ravanel and M. Tissut, J. Agric. Food Chem., 51, 1347 (2003); https://doi.org/10.1021/jf025843j.
- L.M. Cole, R.A. Nicholson and J.E. Casida, Pestic. Biochem. Physiol., 46, 47 (1993); https://doi.org/10.1006/pest.1993.1035.
- US Environmental Protection Agency, New Pesticide Fact Sheet: Washington, DC, US PB96-181516; EPA737-F-96-005, U.S. EPA Officeof Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances pp. 10 (1996).
- Package of Practices for Kharif Crops, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, India p. 1 (2011).
- B. Kumari, V.K. Madan and T.S. Kathpal, Environ. Monit. Assess., 136, 239 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9679-1.
- M. Thompson, S.L.R. Ellison and R. Wood, Pure Appl. Chem., 74, 835 (2002); https://doi.org/10.1351/pac200274050835.
- R.H. Mohammad, M.N. Seyed and K. Kamyar, Acta Chim. Slov., 53, 517 (2006).
- S. Mohapatra, M. Deepa, G.K. Jagdish, N. Rashmi, S. Kumar and G.S. Prakash, Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 84, 587 (2010).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-010-9965-4.
- C.S. Feung and S.P. Yenne, Fipronil: Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism, Rhône-Poulenc Agricultural Limited, Data Package ID No. 169043, DPR Document No. 52062-180 (1997).
- B. Kumari, In Proceeding of IUPAC Sponsored First International Conference on Agrochemicals Protecting Crop, Health and Natural Environment, organized by Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Society of Pesticide Science India and Indian Council of Agricultural Research, held at New Delhi from 8-11th January, p. 128 (2008).
References
https://www.indiastat.com/2016.
World Wheat: FAPRI 2005. Agricultural Outlook, pp. 148 (2005).
C.D.S. Tomlin, The Pesticide Manual. The British Crop Protection Council, Surrey, UK, pp. 413 (2000).
A. Aajoud, P. Ravanel and M. Tissut, J. Agric. Food Chem., 51, 1347 (2003); https://doi.org/10.1021/jf025843j.
L.M. Cole, R.A. Nicholson and J.E. Casida, Pestic. Biochem. Physiol., 46, 47 (1993); https://doi.org/10.1006/pest.1993.1035.
US Environmental Protection Agency, New Pesticide Fact Sheet: Washington, DC, US PB96-181516; EPA737-F-96-005, U.S. EPA Officeof Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances pp. 10 (1996).
Package of Practices for Kharif Crops, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, India p. 1 (2011).
B. Kumari, V.K. Madan and T.S. Kathpal, Environ. Monit. Assess., 136, 239 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9679-1.
M. Thompson, S.L.R. Ellison and R. Wood, Pure Appl. Chem., 74, 835 (2002); https://doi.org/10.1351/pac200274050835.
R.H. Mohammad, M.N. Seyed and K. Kamyar, Acta Chim. Slov., 53, 517 (2006).
S. Mohapatra, M. Deepa, G.K. Jagdish, N. Rashmi, S. Kumar and G.S. Prakash, Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 84, 587 (2010).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-010-9965-4.
C.S. Feung and S.P. Yenne, Fipronil: Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism, Rhône-Poulenc Agricultural Limited, Data Package ID No. 169043, DPR Document No. 52062-180 (1997).
B. Kumari, In Proceeding of IUPAC Sponsored First International Conference on Agrochemicals Protecting Crop, Health and Natural Environment, organized by Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Society of Pesticide Science India and Indian Council of Agricultural Research, held at New Delhi from 8-11th January, p. 128 (2008).