Issue

Vol. 29 No. 9 (2017): Vol 29 Issue 9

Copyright (c) 2017 AJC

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Factors Affecting the Process of Anodic Dissolution Under Electropolishing Conditions by Adsorption of Polymers Molecules on Carbon Steel Surface

https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2017.20617
Hamdy F.M. El-Shamy
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Damietta University, Damietta, Egypt
Y.A. Aggour
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Damietta University, Damietta, Egypt
A.M. Ahmed
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
Mervette El-Batouti
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt

Corresponding Author(s) : Hamdy F.M. El-Shamy

hamdi.alex88@yahoo.com

Asian Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 29 No. 9 (2017): Vol 29 Issue 9

Abstract

Many corrosion inhibitors can be used to eliminate the undesirable destructive effect and prevent carbon steel dissolution. Polymers were found to inhibit the process of anodic dissolution. It is found that the limiting current of anodic dissolution decreases with increasing concentration of the natural polymers (viz., starch, chitosan, cellulose acetate and carboxymethyl cellulose sodium salt) which indicated the increase in inhibition efficiency and the stabilization of passive layer of polymers molecules as protective film on carbon steel surface. The effect of viscosity of the solution at different concentrations and temperatures were studied. Dissolution rate and percentage inhibition was determined by weight loss method. Values of activation energy indicate that the rate controlled step is the diffusion of aqueous species in the boundary layer and the isokinetic temperatures were estimated. Those polymers verify Flory-Huggins isotherm. Negative values of free energy of adsorption revealing to the spontaneous adsorption of polymers molecules on carbon steel surface. The adsorption of these polymers molecules on the anode surface was confirmed by scanning electron microscopy. Forced convection mechanism were applied and we obtained that the flow in system were turbulent flow.

Keywords

Natural polymers Anodic dissolution Inhibition efficiency Passive layer
El-Shamy, H. F., Aggour, Y., Ahmed, A., & El-Batouti, M. (2017). Factors Affecting the Process of Anodic Dissolution Under Electropolishing Conditions by Adsorption of Polymers Molecules on Carbon Steel Surface. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 29(9), 1933–1940. https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2017.20617
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. M. Inman, E. Taylor and T. Hall, J. Electrochem. Soc., 160, E94 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1149/2.044309jes.
  2. D. Gonnella, R. Eichhorn, F. Furuta, M. Ge, D. Hall, V. Ho, G. Hoffstaetter, M. Liepe, T. O’Connell, S. Posen, P. Quigley, J. Sears, V. Veshcherevich, A. Grassellino, A. Romanenko and D.A. Sergatskov, J. Appl. Phys., 117, 023908 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4905681.
  3. E.M. Sherif and S.M. Park, J. Electrochem. Soc., 152, B428 (2005); https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2018254.
  4. E.-S.M. Sherif, Surf. Sci. Appl., 252, 8615 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2005.11.082.
  5. N. Lezi and A. Economou, Electroanalysis, 27, 2313 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.201500127.
  6. P. Kanyong, G. Hughes, R.M. Pemberton, S.K. Jackson and J.P. Hart, Anal. Lett., 49, 236 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1080/00032719.2015.1070166.
  7. M. Scendo, D. Poddebnia and J. Malyszko, J. Appl. Electrochem., 33, 287 (2003); https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024117230591.
  8. El-Sayed M. Sherif, A.M. El Shamy, M.M. Ramla and A.O.H. El-Nazhawy, Mater. Chem. Phys., 102, 231 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2006.12.009.
  9. A.H. Mahmoudi, A. Ghasemi, G.H. Farrahi and K. Sherafatnia, Mater. Des., 90, 478 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.10.162.
  10. J.-E. Qu, X. Guo and Z. Chen, Mater. Chem. Phys., 93, 388 (2005); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2005.03.028.
  11. N. Bellakhal and M. Dachraoui, Mater. Chem. Phys., 85, 366 (2004); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2004.01.011.
  12. T. Hryniewicz and K. Rokosz, Front. Mater., 1, 3 (2014); https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2014.00003.
  13. Y. Wang, E. Laborda and R.G. Compton, J. Electroanal. Chem., 670, 56 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2012.02.016.
  14. T. Poornima, J. Nayak and A.N. Shetty, Corros. Sci., 53, 3688 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2011.07.014.
  15. K.C. Honeychurch, J. Brooks and J.P. Hart, Talanta, 147, 510 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2015.10.032.
  16. T. Asai, T. Konishi and Y. Sasaki, J. Chem. Eng. Jpn, 21, 107 (1988); https://doi.org/10.1252/jcej.21.107.
  17. M. Arvand, N. Ghodsi and M.A. Zanjanchi, Biosens. Bioelectron., 77, 837 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2015.10.055.
  18. Y. Teng, W. Liu, M. Lan, S. Ma and C. Ma, Anal. Lett., 49, 299 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1080/00032719.2015.1070164.
  19. A. Noor, Mater. Chem. Phys., 114, 533 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2008.09.065.
  20. S.M.H. Gangaraj, M. Guagliano and G.H. Farrahi, Surf. Coat. Technol., 243, 39 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.03.057.
  21. M.C. Ross, Proceedings of SRF2015, Whistler, BC, Canada, p. MOBA01 (2015).
  22. S. Arrhenius, Z. Physik Chem., 1, 285 (1887); https://doi.org/10.1515/zpch-1887-0133.
  23. C. Kokkinos, M. Prodromidis, A. Economou, P. Petrou and S. Kakabakos, Electrochem. Commun., 60, 47 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2015.08.006.
  24. U. Ateya, B.E. El-Anadouli and F.M. El-Nizamy, Corros. Sci., 24, 509 (1984); https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-938X(84)90033-7.
  25. H. Otmacic and E. Stupnisek-Lisac, Electrochim. Acta, 48, 985 (2003); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-4686(02)00811-3.
  26. E.E. Ebenso, Bull. Electrochem., 19, 209 (2003).
  27. E.E. Ebenso and P. Cokafor, Bull. Electrochem., 17, 459 (2001).
  28. R.D. Kaushik, R.R. Malik, J. Singh and Manila, Int. J. Chemtech Res., 6, 3122 (2014).
  29. A.-M.M. Ahmed, A.A.-H. Abdel-Rahman and A.F. El Adl, J. Dispers. Sci. Technol., 31, 343 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1080/01932690903192598.
  30. T. Juuti, S. Uusikallio, A.J. Kaijalainen, E. Heinonen, N.T. Tun and D.A. Porter, Mater. Sci. Forum, 879, 873 (2016); https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.879.873.
  31. M. El-Batouti, S.H. Salaam, A.M. Ahmed and H.F.M. El-Shamy, Asian J. Chem., 28, 965 (2016); https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2016.19450.
  32. H. Ashassi-Sorkhabi, B. Shaabani and D. Seifzadeh, Appl. Surf. Sci., 239, 154 (2005); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2004.05.143.
  33. M. Bouklah, N. Benchat, A. Aouniti, B. Hammouti, M. Benkaddour, M. Lagrenée, H. Vezin and F. Bentiss, Prog. Org. Coat., 51, 118 (2004); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2004.06.005.
  34. S.M. Dinnappa and R.K. Mayanna, J. Appl. Electrochem., 11, 111 (1981); https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00615329.
  35. D. Mohamed, A. Keera and S. Farid, Egypt J. Petrol., 13, 87 (2004).
  36. H.H. Abdel-Rahman and M.A. Darweesh, Egypt. J. Chem., 49, 19 (2006).
  37. N.M. El-Mallah, A.M. Ahmed and L.F. Gado, J. Dispers. Sci. Technol., 31, 1579 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1080/01932690903218005.
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0