Issue

Vol. 35 No. 6 (2023): Vol 35 Issue 6, 2023

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Development of Enhanced Ultraviolet Resistance Hybrid Cotton Fabric using Functionalized Biocarbon derived from Teff (Eragrostis tef) Hay

https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2023.27898
Kibebe Sahile
Department of Chemical Engineering, College of Biological and Chemical Engineering, Addis Ababa Science and Technology University, Addis Ababa 16417, Ethiopia
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4679-6449
S. Venkatesa Prabhu
Department of Chemical Engineering, College of Biological and Chemical Engineering, Addis Ababa Science and Technology University, Addis Ababa 16417, Ethiopia Centre of Excellence, Biotechnology and Bioprocess, Addis Ababa Science and Technology University, Addis Ababa 16417, Ethiopia
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1101-6051
Abebe Worku
Department of Environmental Engineering, College of Biological and Chemical Engineering, Center of Excellence for Sustainable Energy, Addis Ababa Science and Technology University, Addis Ababa, 16417, Ethiopia
https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2278-3017

Corresponding Author(s) : S. Venkatesa Prabhu

venkatesa.prabhu@aastu.edu.et

Asian Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 35 No. 6 (2023): Vol 35 Issue 6, 2023

Abstract

Due to the depletion of ozone atmosphere, there is a progressive increase in impact of ultraviolet (UV) radiation on human skin. The continual exposure of UV radiation results in serious adverse effects, such as photodermatosis, abnormal skin aging, erythema and skin cancer. Present study aimed to develop an improved UV resisting cotton fabric using the biocarbon derived from the abundantly available biomass residue of teff (Eragrostis tef) hay. The biocarbon had its surface functionalized, and then it was deposited onto the cotton using polyaniline as a grafting medium. In situ polymerization method was adopted for preparing the enhanced UV shielding fabric. The required functionalized biocarbon and polyaniline were optimized for attaining the maximum possible UV protection factor of the cotton. From the results, the UV protecting ability of the developed cotton fabric was found to be improved by 21 times higher as compared to ultraviolet protection factor (UPF = 66.3) than the original cotton (UPF = 3.1). In addition, the developed cotton fabric was observed to be exhibited excellent tensile strength. The morphological and structural studies were investigated using scanning electron microscopy and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy for pure cotton fabric and hybrid material coated by biocarbon. Experimentation results revealed that the biocarbon obtained from teff hay could be a used for developing the enhanced UV protecting textile material. Hence, the acquired material can perform for better ultraviolet protection.

Keywords

Teff (Eragrostis tef) Hay Biocarbon Cotton fabric Ultraviolet resistance
Sahile, K., Prabhu, S. V., & Worku, A. (2023). Development of Enhanced Ultraviolet Resistance Hybrid Cotton Fabric using Functionalized Biocarbon derived from Teff (Eragrostis tef) Hay. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 35(6), 1477–1484. https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2023.27898
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. O.K. Alebeid and T. Zhao, J. Textil. Inst., 108, 2027 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2017.1311201
  2. G. Natarajan, T.P. Rajan and S. Das, J. Nat. Fibers, 19, 4350 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2020.1857895
  3. M. Adnan, J. Jeyakodi Moses and A. Lakshmanan, J. Textil. Inst., 112, 2048 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2020.1862517
  4. C. Sanchez, L. Rozes, F. Ribot, C. Laberty-Robert, D. Grosso, C. Sassoye, C. Boissiere and L. Nicole, Comptes Rendus Chim., 13, 3 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crci.2009.06.001
  5. O.L. Galkina, A. Sycheva, À. Blagodatskiy, G. Kaptay, V.L. Katanaev, G.A. Seisenbaeva, V.G. Kessler and A.V. Agafonov, Surf. Coat. Technol., 253, 171 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.05.033
  6. V. Pandiyarasan, J. Archana, A. Pavithra, V. Ashwin, M. Navaneethan, Y. Hayakawa and H. Ikeda, Mater. Lett., 188, 123 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2016.11.047
  7. L. Qu, M. Tian, X. Hu, Y. Wang, S. Zhu, X. Guo, G. Han, X. Zhang, K. Sun and X. Tang, Carbon, 80, 565 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2014.08.097
  8. B. Ge, Z. Zhang, X. Zhu, X. Men, X. Zhou and Q. Xue, Compos. Sci. Technol., 102, 100 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.07.020
  9. M. Zhukovskyi, L. Sanchez-Botero, M.P. McDonald, J. Hinestroza and M. Kuno, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 6, 2262 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1021/am4052602
  10. H. Bi, Z. Yin, X. Cao, X. Xie, C. Tan, X. Huang, B. Chen, F. Chen, Q. Yang, X. Bu, X. Lu, L. Sun and H. Zhang, Adv. Mater., 25, 5916 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201302435
  11. D.H. Mueller and A. Krobjilowski, J. Ind. Text., 33, 111 (2003); https://doi.org/10.1177/152808303039248
  12. A. Nilghaz, D.H.B. Wicaksono, D. Gustiono, F.A. Abdul Majid, E. Supriyanto and M.R. Abdul Kadir, Lab Chip, 12, 209 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1039/C1LC20764D
  13. N. Joseph, J. Varghese and M.T. Sebastian, Polym. J., 10, 121 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1038/pj.2016.121
  14. B. Leng, Z. Shao, G. de With and W. Ming, Langmuir, 25, 2456 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1021/la8031144
  15. A.J. Patil and S.C. Deogaonkar, Text. Res. J., 82, 1517 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517512452930
  16. J. Vince, B. Orel, A. Vilènik, M. Fir, A. Šurca Vuk, V. Jovanovski and B. Simonèiè, Langmuir, 22, 6489 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1021/la060694a
  17. M.P. Gashti, A. Almasian and M.P. Gashti, Sens. Actuators A Phys., 187, 1 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2012.08.004
  18. X. Jiang, X. Tian, J. Gu, D. Huang and Y. Yang, Appl. Surf. Sci., 257, 8451 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.04.128
  19. M. Shateri-Khalilabad and M.E. Yazdanshenas, Cellulose, 20, 3039 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-0040-2
  20. J. Alongi, M. Ciobanu and G. Malucelli, Cellulose, 18, 1335 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-011-9564-5
  21. E. Devaux, M. Rochery and S. Bourbigot, Fire Mater., 26, 149 (2002); https://doi.org/10.1002/fam.792
  22. G. Brancatelli, C. Colleoni, M.R. Massafra and G. Rosace, Polym. Degrad. Stab., 96, 483 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2011.01.013
  23. S. Hu, Y. Hu and L. Song, J. Therm. Anal. Caloirm, 103, 423 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-010-1093-1
  24. H. Lu, B. Fei, J.H. Xin, R. Wang and L. Li, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 300, 111 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2006.03.059
  25. A. El.Shafei and A. Abou-Okeil, Carbohydr. Polym., 83, 920 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.08.083
  26. M. Gouda and S.M.A.S. Keshk, Carbohydr. Polym., 80, 504 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.12.011
  27. N. Vigneshwaran, S. Kumar, A.A. Kathe, P.V. Varadarajan and V. Prasad, J. Nanotechnol., 17, 5087 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/17/20/008
  28. N. Èuk, M. Šala and M. Gorjanc, Cellulose, 28, 3215 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-021-03715-y
  29. R. Aladpoosh, M. Montazer and N. Samadi, Cellulose, 21, 3755 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0369-1
  30. H. Barani and B. Mahltig, Cellulose, 27, 9105 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03400-6
  31. J. Filipic, D. Glazar, S. Jerebic, D. Kenda, A. Modic, B. Roskar, I. Vrhovski, D. Stular, B. Golja, S. Smolej, B. Tomšiè, M. Gorjanc and B. Simonèiè, Tekstilec., 63, 4 (2020); https://doi.org/10.14502/Tekstilec2020.63.4-13
  32. A. Nosheen, M. Khalid, S. Manzoor, M. Ashraf, Z. Xue, S. Akram, D.S. Khan, S. Urooj and A.H. Hashmi, Cellulose, 30, 2573 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-022-05009-3
  33. Y. Yu, C. Hurren, K. Millington, L. Sun and X. Wang, Text. Res. J., 85, 1946 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517515578335
  34. M.Z. Khan, V. Baheti, M. Ashraf, T. Hussain, A. Ali, A. Javid and A. Rehman, Fibers Polym., 19, 1647 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-018-7935-3
  35. M. Gorjanc, K. Jazbec, M. Šala, R. Zaplotnik, A. Vesel and M. Mozetiè, Cellulose, 21, 3007 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0284-5
  36. M. Kert, K. Jazbec and I. Jerman, Acta Chim. Slov., 61, 587 (2014).
  37. G. Kibria, M.R. Repon, M.F. Hossain, T. Islam, M.A. Jalil, M.D. Aljabri and M.M. Rahman, Cellulose, 29, 7555 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-022-04710-7
  38. I. Ahmad, C. Kan and Z. Yao, RSC Adv., 9, 18106 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RA02023C
  39. Q.Q. Zhou, J.C. Lv, Y. Ren, J.Y. Chen, D.W. Gao, Z.Q. Lu and C.X. Wang, Text. Res. J., 87, 2407 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517516671124
  40. Y. Shen, L. Zhen, D. Huang and J. Xue, Cellulose, 21, 3745 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0367-3
  41. I. Bramhecha and J. Sheikh, Carbon Trends, 4, 100067 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cartre.2021.100067
  42. N.R. Dhineshbabu and S. Bose, ACS Omega, 3, 7454 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b00822
  43. X. Hu, M. Tian, L. Qu, S. Zhu and G. Han, Carbon, 95, 625 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2015.08.099
  44. X. Tang, M. Tian, L. Qu, S. Zhu, X. Guo, G. Han, K. Sun, X. Hu, Y. Wang and X. Xu, Synth. Met., 202, 82 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.synthmet.2015.01.017
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download
AJC-35-6-25
Statistic
Read Counter : 1 Download : 0