Issue

Vol. 27 No. 12 (2015): Vol 27 Issue 12

Copyright (c) 2015 AJC

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Selective Transport of Fe(III) Using Polyeugenol as Functional Polymer with Ionic Imprinted Polymer Membrane Method

https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2015.19228
Muhammad Cholid Djunaidi
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia; Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Jumina
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Dwi Siswanta
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Mathias Ulbricht
Lehrstuhl für Technische Chemie II, Fakultät für Chemie, Universität Duisburg-Essen, 45117 Essen, Germany

Corresponding Author(s) : Muhammad Cholid Djunaidi

cholid_dj@undip.ac.id

Asian Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 27 No. 12 (2015): Vol 27 Issue 12

Abstract

The synthesis of ionic imprinted polymer-Fe membrane using eugenol derivative (polyeugenol) had been done followed by its utilization study as functional polymer for selective transport of Fe(III). Eugenol was polymerized using BF3-diethyl ether as catalyst. The polyeugenol was then bounded with an ion template [Fe(III)] followed by in situ crosslinking with polyethylene glycol diglycidyl ether and membrane base poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA, Mr = 125,000) in 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidone. A membrane was obtained after casting at 25 m/s and soaking in NaCl solution for 2 days. The membrane soaked further in 0.1 M HCl solution to release Fe(III). The membrane was then analyzed using IR spectrometry, TGA-DTA, SEM and size selective test. Different optimizations steps were carried out for both the synthesis conditions and transport experiments. The selectivity of ionic imprinted polymer membrane for Fe(III) was studied using Cr(III), in separated systems with Cr(III) and Fe(III) in different solutions as well as using binary mixture solutions of the two metals. Experimental results indicate that the crosslinked ionic imprinted polymer membranes are more selective than non-imprinting polymers and as well as its constituents.

Keywords

Fe-ionic imprinted polymer membrane Polyeugenol Fe(III) Selectivity
Cholid Djunaidi, M., Jumina, ., Siswanta, D., & Ulbricht, M. (2015). Selective Transport of Fe(III) Using Polyeugenol as Functional Polymer with Ionic Imprinted Polymer Membrane Method. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 27(12), 4553–4562. https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2015.19228
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. F. Trotta, M. Biasizzo and F. Caldera, Membranes, 2, 440 (2012); doi:10.3390/membranes2030440.
  2. M. Ulbricht, Polymer, 47, 2217 (2006); doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2006.01.084.
  3. M. Ulbricht, J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci., 804, 113 (2004); doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2004.02.007.
  4. J.O. Mahony, K. Nolan, M.R. Smyth and B. Mizaikoff, Anal. Chim. Acta, 534, 31 (2005); doi:10.1016/j.aca.2004.07.043.
  5. F.G. Tamayo, E. Turiel and A. Martín-Esteban, J. Chromatogr. A, 1152, 32 (2007); doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2006.08.095.
  6. H.T. Fan and T. Sun, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 29, 798 (2012); doi:10.1007/s11814-011-0234-y.
  7. X. Chang, N. Jiang, H. Zheng, Q. He, Z. Hu, Y. Zhai and Y. Cui, Talanta, 71, 38 (2007); doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2006.03.012.
  8. F. Xie, G. Liu, F. Wu, G. Guo and G. Li, Chem. Eng., 183, 372 (2012); doi:10.1016/j.cej.2012.01.018.
  9. M. Sölener, S. Tunali, A.S. Özcan, A. Özcan and T. Gedikbey, Desalination, 223, 308 (2008); doi:10.1016/j.desal.2007.01.221.
  10. E. Guibal, Sep. Purif. Technol., 38, 43 (2004); doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2003.10.004.
  11. G.J. Copello, F. Varela, M. Vivot and L.E. Diaz, Bioresour. Technol., 99, 6538 (2008); doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2007.11.055.
  12. P. Miretzky and A.F. Cirelli, J. Hazard. Mater., 167, 10 (2009); doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.01.060.
  13. L. Harimu, S. Matsjeh, D. Siswanta and S.J. Santoso, Indo J. Chem., 9, 261 (2009).
  14. M.C. Djunaidi and D. Trisna, JSKA, 13, 2 (2010).
  15. M.C. Djunaidi, R.A. Lusiana and P.J. Wibowa, J. Alchemy, 6, 40 (2007).
  16. C. Algieri, E. Drioli, L. Guzzo and L. Donato, Sensors, 14, 13863 (2014); doi:10.3390/s140813863.
  17. N. Hilal, V. Kochkodan, L. Al-Khatib and G. Busca, Surf. Interface Anal., 33, 672 (2002); doi:10.1002/sia.1434.
  18. B. Bolto, T. Tran, M. Hoang and Z. Xie, Prog. Polym. Sci., 34, 969 (2009); doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.05.003.
  19. G. Merle, S.S. Hosseiny, M. Wessling and K. Nijmeijer, J. Membr. Sci., 409-410, 191 (2012); doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2012.03.056.
  20. S.A. Piletsky, T.L. Panasyuk, E.V. Piletskaya, I.A. Nicholls and M. Ulbricht, J. Membr. Sci., 157, 263 (1999); doi:10.1016/S0376-7388(99)00007-1.
  21. C. Geismann, A. Yaroshchuk and M. Ulbricht, Langmuir, 23, 76 (2007); doi:10.1021/la0603774.
  22. C. Geismann and M. Ulbricht, Macromol. Chem. Phys., 206, 268 (2005); doi:10.1002/macp.200400374.
  23. X.-F. Lei and J.-X. Ma, J. Braz. Chem. Soc., 21, 209 (2010); doi:10.1590/S0103-50532010000200004.
  24. F.C. Baes and R.E. dan Mesmer, The Hydrolysis of Cations, John Wiley, New York (1976).
  25. A.A. Kiswandono, D. Siswanta, N.H. Aprilita and S. Santosa, Indo. J. Chem., 12, 105 (2012).
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0