Issue

Vol. 35 No. 3 (2023): Vol 35 Issue 3

Date Log

Submitted
Feb 28, 2023
Published
Feb 27, 2023

Influence of Synergistic Tributyl Phosphate and Di-(2-ethylhexyl)phosphoric Acid for Separation of Gadolinium and Samarium by Emulsion Liquid Membrane

S. Effendi
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Padjadjaran University, Jl. Raya Bandung-Sumedang Km. 21 Jatinangor, Sumedang, Jawa Barat 45363, Indonesia
A. Hardianto
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Padjadjaran University, Jl. Raya Bandung-Sumedang Km. 21 Jatinangor, Sumedang, Jawa Barat 45363, Indonesia
S. Wyantuti
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Padjadjaran University, Jl. Raya Bandung-Sumedang Km. 21 Jatinangor, Sumedang, Jawa Barat 45363, Indonesia
U. Pratomo
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Padjadjaran University, Jl. Raya Bandung-Sumedang Km. 21 Jatinangor, Sumedang, Jawa Barat 45363, Indonesia
H.H. Bahti
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Padjadjaran University, Jl. Raya Bandung-Sumedang Km. 21 Jatinangor, Sumedang, Jawa Barat 45363, Indonesia
A. Anggraeni
anni.anggraeni@unpad.ac.id
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Padjadjaran University, Jl. Raya Bandung-Sumedang Km. 21 Jatinangor, Sumedang, Jawa Barat 45363, Indonesia

Corresponding Author(s) : A. Anggraeni

anni.anggraeni@unpad.ac.id

Asian Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 35 No. 3 (2023): Vol 35 Issue 3 page 563-568

Abstract

Gadolinium is one of the rare earth elements, which plays an essential role in modern industry. Its separation from mixtures of other rare earth elements is challenging due to similar physical and chemical properties. The extraction method using an emulsion liquid membrane is an effective and simple method for separating low concentration gadolinium from other rare earth elements mixtures. It is more eco-friendly than the liquid-liquid extraction process and also has various advantages. This study aims to determine the effectiveness, permeability and optimum formulation conditions for the separation of gadolinium and samarium using synergistic ligands tributyl phosphate and di-(2-ethylhexyl)phosphoric acid. The results showed a quantitative extraction (87.40%) of gadolinium ion at the optimum conditions of 0.025 M tributyl phosphate + 0.075 M di-(2-ethylhexyl phosphate), 4% span 80 as surfactant, 9000 rpm emulsification stirring speed and 0.5 M nitric acid as stripping phase, for a feed containing 1.5 mg/L gadolinium ion and 3 mg/L samarium ion at 5 M HNO3.

Keywords

Emulsion liquid membranes Synergistic activity Rare-earth elements
EffendiS., HardiantoA., WyantutiS., PratomoU., BahtiH., & AnggraeniA. (2023). Influence of Synergistic Tributyl Phosphate and Di-(2-ethylhexyl)phosphoric Acid for Separation of Gadolinium and Samarium by Emulsion Liquid Membrane. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 35(3), 563-568. Retrieved from https://asianpubs.org/index.php/ajchem/article/view/27752
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. S. Wu, L. Wang, L. Zhao, P. Zhang, H. El-Shall, B. Moudgil, X. Huang and L. Zhang, Chem. Eng. J., 335, 774 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.10.143
  2. V. Balaram, Geosci. Frontiers, 10, 1285 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2018.12.005
  3. B. Swain and E.O. Otu, Sep. Purif. Technol., 83, 82 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2011.09.015
  4. K. Binnemans, P.T. Jones, B. Blanpain, T. Van Gerven, Y. Yang, A. Walton and M. Buchert, J. Clean. Prod., 51, 1 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.037
  5. T. Fishman, R.J. Myers, O. Rios and T.E. Graedel, Resources, 7, 9 (2018); https://doi.org/10.3390/resources7010009
  6. M. Al Rashdi, M.R. El Tokhi, S. Alaabed, E. El Mowafi and A.A. Arabi, Nat. Resour. Res., 29, 4149 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-020-09661-z
  7. H.M. Dale, J.R.L. de Mattos and M.S. Dias, IntechOpen., 175, 8 (2013).
  8. M.A. Ibrahim, B. Hazhirkarzar and A.B. Dublin, Gadolinium Magnetic Resonance Imaging, StatPearls: United States (2021).
  9. K. Kondo, M. Oguri and M. Matsumoto, Chem. Eng. Transac., 32, 919 (2013); https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1332154
  10. M. Chakraborty, C. Bhattacharya and S. Datta, In Eds.: V. Kislik, Emulsion Hybrid Liquid Membranes: Definitions and Classification, Theories, Module Design, Applications, New Directions and Perspectives, In: Liquid Membranes Principles and Applications in Chemical Separations & Wastewater Treatment, Edn.: 1, Elsevier, Boston, pp. 141-200 (2010)
  11. H. Shaaban, RSC Adv., 13, 5058 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1039/D2RA08221G
  12. A. Abdelrasoul, H. Doan, A. Lohi and C. Cheng, Mass Transfer Mechanisms and Transport Resistances in Membrane Separation Process, IntechOpen, Chap. 2, pp. 15-40 (2015).
  13. Z. Zhou, W. Qin, W. Fei and Y. Li, Chin. J. Chem. Eng., 20, 36 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1016/S1004-9541(12)60360-7
  14. J.W. Frankenfeld, R.P. Cahn and N.N. Li, Sep. Sci. Technol., 16, 385 (1981); https://doi.org/10.1080/01496398108068528
  15. B. Mokhtari and K. Pourabdollah, Chin. J. Chem. Eng., 23, 641 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2014.06.035
  16. A. Kumar, A. Thakur and P.S. Panesar, Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol., 18, 153 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-019-09492-2
  17. R. Torkaman, M.A. Moosavian, M. Torab-Mostaedi and J. Safdari, Hydrometallurgy, 137, 101 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2013.04.005
  18. N. Effendy, K.T. Basuki, D. Biyantoro and N.K. Perwira, IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng., 349, 012044 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/349/1/012044
  19. M. Nascimento, B.M. Valverde, F.A. Ferreira, R.D.C. Gomes and P.S.M. Soares, REM Rev. Escola Minas, 68, 427 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1590/0370-44672015680140
  20. A. Pedcenko, S. Molokov and B. Bardet, Process Metall. Mater. Process. Sci., 48, 6 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-016-0840-5
  21. H. Liu, G. He, L. Li, S. Gu, C. Liu and G. Xiao, J. Dispers. Sci. Technol., 27, 773 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1080/01932690500459416
  22. M.V. Purwani and D. Biyantoro, J. Tek. Bhn. Nuklir., 9, 55 (2013).
  23. Y. Wan, J. Membr. Sci., 196, 185 (2002); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(01)00554-3
  24. K.T. Basuki and N.S. Pamungkas, Indon. J. Chem., 19, 865 (2019); https://doi.org/10.22146/ijc.35783
  25. N. Jusoh and N. Othman, Malaysian J. Fundam. Appl. Sci., 12, 114 (2017); https://doi.org/10.11113/mjfas.v12n3.429
  26. K. Abbassian and A. Kargari, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 4, 3926 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2016.08.030
  27. Z. Fajun, T. Zhexi, Y. Zhongqi, S. Hongzhi, W. Yanping and Z. Yufei, Energy Sci. Eng., 8, 4158 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.814
  28. V.S. Kislik, Principles & Applications in Chemical Separations & Wastewater Treatment, Elsevier: Netherlands (2010).
  29. A. Kargari, T. Kaghazchi, M. Sohrabi and M. Soleimani, J. Membr. Sci., 233, 1 (2004); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2003.09.027
  30. M.S. Gasser, N.E. El-Hefny and J.A. Daoud, J. Hazard. Mater., 151, 610 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.06.032
  31. B. Sengupta, R. Sengupta and N. Subrahmanyam, Hydrometallurgy, 84, 43 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2006.04.002
  32. A.L. Ahmad, A. Kusumastuti, C.J.C. Derek and B.S. Ooi, Chem. Eng. J., 171, 870 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.05.102
  33. B. Sengupta, R. Sengupta and N. Subrahmanyam, Hydrometallurgy, 81, 67 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2005.10.002
  34. J. Perera and G. Stevens, Eds.: A.K. Pabby, S.S.H. Rizvi and A.M.S. Requena, Handbook of Membrane Separations: Chemical, Pharmaceutical, Food and Biotechnological Applications, Edn. 1, CRC Press: Boca Raton (2008).
  35. S. Laki and A. Kargari, J. Membr. Sci. Res., 2, 33 (2016); https://doi.org/10.22079/JMSR.2016.15876
  36. T. Kageyama, H. Matsumiya and M. Hiraide, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 379, 1083 (2004); https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-004-2669-z
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download this PDF file
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0