Issue

Vol. 35 No. 2 (2023): Vol 35 Issue 2, 2023

Copyright (c) 2023 AJC

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Suitability of ZnO Nanocomposite of Copolymer (PPy-PNVK-ZnO) (PPy = Polypyrrole; PNVK = Poly 9-vinyl carbazole) for the Detection of 6-Thioguanine: A DFT Analysis

https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2023.26881
Kirtesh Pratap Khare
Department of Chemistry, Amity School of Engineering & Technology, Amity University, Gwalior-474005, India; Advance Materials Research Group and Materials Synthesis and Sensor Design Lab, ABV-Indian Institute of Information Technology and Management, Gwalior-474015, India
Rachana Kathal
Department of Chemistry, Amity School of Engineering & Technology, Amity University, Gwalior-474005, India
Neelima Shukla
Department of Chemistry, Srimant Madhavrao Scindia Government Model Science College, Gwalior-474009, India
Reena Srivastava
Advance Materials Research Group and Materials Synthesis and Sensor Design Lab, ABV-Indian Institute of Information Technology and Management, Gwalior-474015, India
Anurag Srivastava
Advance Materials Research Group and Materials Synthesis and Sensor Design Lab, ABV-Indian Institute of Information Technology and Management, Gwalior-474015, India

Corresponding Author(s) : Kirtesh Pratap Khare

kirteshkhare01@gmail.com

Asian Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 35 No. 2 (2023): Vol 35 Issue 2, 2023

Abstract

Conducting polymers have extensively been exploited for the specific drug detection, through diverse drug responses. 6-Thioguanine (6-TG) is commonly used in the treatment of cancer and its level monitoring in the human body is essential to avoid the side effects due to its physiological metabolites. Computational synthesis of a novel sensor material, i.e. ZnO nanocomposite of copolymer (PPy-PNVK-ZnO) using polypyrrole (PPy-ZnO) and poly 9-vinyl carbazole (PNVK-ZnO) polymers, has been performed and investigated its sensing ability for 6-TG drug, using the density functional theory (DFT) based ab initio approach. Generalized gradient approximation (GGA), parameterized with Perdew, Burke and Ernzerhof (PBE) type parameterization furnishes novel resources on the studied molecular model. The molecular interactions have been analyzed in terms of the HOMO-LUMO gap, density of states (DOS), adsorption energy (Eads), recovery time (τ), Mulliken population, electron density plot and quantum molecular descriptors. The calculated negative adsorption energy confirms the stability of these polymers and observes the type of interaction with 6-TG, as physical adsorption, that also confirms the reusability of the prepared sensor and its low operational temperature. It has also been observed that ZnO nanocomposite of copolymer has favourable stability in comparison to its host counterparts, whereas the host PNVK has a better recovery time and PPy has a relatively better range of detection and highly reactive.

Keywords

Density functional theory Polymeric sensor 6-Thioguanine Anticancer drug Electronic properties Recovery time
Pratap Khare, K., Kathal, R., Shukla, N., Srivastava, R., & Srivastava, A. (2023). Suitability of ZnO Nanocomposite of Copolymer (PPy-PNVK-ZnO) (PPy = Polypyrrole; PNVK = Poly 9-vinyl carbazole) for the Detection of 6-Thioguanine: A DFT Analysis. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 35(2), 422–430. https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2023.26881
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. B. Meijer, C.J.J. Mulder, G.J. Peters, A.A. van Bodegraven and N.K.H. de Boer, World J. Gastroenterol., 22, 9012 (2016); https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i40.9012
  2. P. Karran, Br. Med. Bull., 79-80, 153 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldl020
  3. P. Karran and N. Attard, Nat. Rev. Cancer, 8, 24 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc2292
  4. E. Petit, S. Langouet, H. Akhdar, C. Nicolas-Nicolaz, A. Guillouzo and F. Morel, Toxicol. In Vitro, 22, 632 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2007.12.004
  5. C.W. Keuzenkamp-Jansen, R.A. De Abreu, J.P.M. Bökkerink and J.M.F. Trijbels, J. Chromatogr. B Biomed. Sci. Appl., 672, 53 (1995); https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4347(95)00206-X
  6. N. Bi, M. Hu, H. Zhu, H. Qi, Y. Tian and H. Zhang, Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc., 107, 24 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2013.01.014
  7. W. Wang, S.-F. Wang and F. Xie, Sens. Actuators B Chem., 120, 238 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2006.02.012
  8. L.G. Shaidarova and G.K. Budnikov, J. Anal. Chem., 63, 922 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1134/S106193480810002X
  9. H. Shirakawa, E.J. Louis, A.G. MacDiarmid, C.K. Chiang and A.J. Heeger, J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun., 578 (1977); https://doi.org/10.1039/c39770000578
  10. N. Ka and C.S. Rout, RSC Adv., 11, 5659 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RA07800J
  11. T. Guinovart, M. Parrilla, G.A. Crespo, F.X. Rius and F.J. Andrade, Analyst, 138, 5208 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1039/c3an00710c
  12. D.S. Ghosh, I. Calizo, D. Teweldebrhan, E.P. Pokatilov, D.L. Nika, A.A. Balandin, W. Bao, F. Miao and C.N. Lau, Appl. Phys. Lett., 92, 151911 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2907977
  13. C.-Y. Lin, A. Balamurugan, Y.-H. Lai and K.-C. Ho, Talanta, 82, 1905 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2010.08.010
  14. T. Wang, M. Farajollahi, Y.S. Choi, I-T. Lin, J.E. Marshall, N.M. Thompson, S. Kar-Narayan, J.D.W. Madden and S.K. Smoukov, Interface Focus, 6, 20160026 (2016); http://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2016.0026
  15. S. Prakash, T. Chakrabarty, A.K. Singh and V.K. Shahi, Biosens.Bioelectron., 41, 43 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2012.09.031
  16. G.G. Wallace, M. Smyth and H. Zhao, TrAC-Trends Analyt. Chem., 18, 245 (1999); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-9936(98)00113-7
  17. Y. Wang, A. Liu, Y. Han and T. Li, Polym. Int., 69, 7 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.5907
  18. O. Domínguez-Renedo, M.A. Alonso-Lomillo and M.J. Arcos-Martínez, Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 1042 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2011.627034
  19. T.I. Shaheen, M.E. El-Naggar, J.S. Hussein, M. El-Bana, E. Emara, Z. El-Khayat, M.M.G. Fouda, H. Ebaid and A. Hebeish, Biomed. Pharmacother., 83, 865 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2016.07.052
  20. A. Saxena, R.M. Tripathi and R.P. Singh, Dig. J. Nanomater. Biostruct., 5, 427 (2010).
  21. S. Lin, Y. Zhao, T. Xia, H. Meng, Z. Ji, R. Liu, S. George, S. Xiong, X. Wang, H. Zhang, S. Pokhrel, L. Mädler, R. Damoiseaux, S. Lin and A.E. Nel, ACS Nano, 5, 7284 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1021/nn202116p
  22. U.T. Khatoon, K. Mohan Mantravadi and G.V.S. Nageswara Rao, Mater. Sci. Technol., 34, 2214 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1080/02670836.2018.1482600
  23. M.R. Mahmoudian, Y. Alias, W.J. Basirun and M. Ebadi, Electrochim. Acta, 72, 46 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2012.03.144
  24. L. Xing, Q. Rong and Z. Ma, Sens. Actuators B Chem., 221, 242 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2015.06.078
  25. L. Zou, Y. Li, S. Cao and B. Ye, Talanta, 117, 333 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2013.09.035
  26. L.E. Greene, M. Law, D.H. Tan, M. Montano, J. Goldberger, G. Somorjai and P. Yang, Nano Lett., 5, 1231 (2005); https://doi.org/10.1021/nl050788p
  27. B. Postels, M. Kreye, H.-H. Wehmann, A. Bakin, N. Boukos, A. Travlos and A. Waag, Superlattices Microstruct., 42, 425 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spmi.2007.04.045
  28. Z.W. Pan, Z.R. Dai and Z.L. Wang, Science, 291, 1947 (2001); https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1058120
  29. X.Y. Kong, Y. Ding, R. Yang and Z.L. Wang, Science, 303, 1348 (2004); https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1092356
  30. P.X. Gao and Z.L. Wang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 125, 11299 (2003); https://doi.org/10.1021/ja035569p
  31. H.A. Wahab, A.A. Salama, A.A. El Saeid, M. Willander, O. Nur and I.K. Battisha, Results Phys., 9, 809 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2018.02.077
  32. K.P. Khare, R. Kathal, N. Shukla, R. Srivastava and A. Srivastava, AIP Conf. Proc., 2352, 020072 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0052388
  33. K.P. Khare, R. Kathal and R. Srivastava, Mater. Today Proc., 48, 641 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.06.040
  34. W. Koch and M.C. Holthausen, A Chemist’s Guide to Density Functional Theory, John Wiley & Sons (2015).
  35. S. Smidstrup, T. Markussen, P. Vancraeyveld, J. Wellendorff, J. Schneider, T. Gunst, B. Verstichel, D. Stradi, P.A. Khomyakov, U.G. Vej-Hansen, M.-E. Lee, S.T. Chill, F. Rasmussen, G. Penazzi, F. Corsetti, A. Ojanperä, K. Jensen, M.L.N. Palsgaard, U. Martinez, A. Blom, M. Brandbyge and K. Stokbro, J. Phys. Condens. Matter, 32, 15901 (2020);
  36. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/ab4007
  37. X. Xu and W.A. Goddard III, J. Chem. Phys., 121, 4068 (2004); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1771632
  38. S. Gowtham, R.H. Scheicher, R. Ahuja, R. Pandey and S.P. Karna, Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys., 76, 33401 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.76.033401
  39. S. Agrawal, G. Kaushal and A. Srivastava, Chem. Phys. Lett., 762, 138121 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2020.138121
  40. K. Gaurav, B. SanthiBhushan, R. Mehla and A. Srivastava, J. Electron. Mater., 50, 1022 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-020-08663-0
  41. J. Luo, Z.Q. Xue, W.M. Liu, J.L. Wu and Z.Q. Yang, J. Phys. Chem. A, 110, 12005 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1021/jp063669m
  42. R. Kurtaran, S. Odabasioglu, A. Azizoglu, H. Kara and O. Atakol, Polyhedron, 26, 5069 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poly.2007.07.021
  43. M. Vatanparast and Z. Shariatinia, J. Mol. Graph. Model., 89, 50 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmgm.2019.02.012
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 4 Download : 1