Issue

Vol. 35 No. 2 (2023): Vol 35 Issue 2, 2023

Copyright (c) 2023 AJC

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Adsorption of Chromium(VI) from Aqueous Solution using Iron Oxide Loaded Strong Base Anion Exchange Resin

https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2023.26935
Harish N. Revankar
Department of Chemistry, K.L.S. Gogte Institute of Technology, Belagavi-590008, India ; Centre for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, K.L.S. Gogte Institute of Technology (Affiliated to Visvesvaraya Technological University "Jnana Sangama" Belagavi), Belagavi-590008, India
Prasanna S. Koujalagi
Department of Chemistry, K.L.S. Gogte Institute of Technology, Belagavi-590008, India ; Centre for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, K.L.S. Gogte Institute of Technology (Affiliated to Visvesvaraya Technological University "Jnana Sangama" Belagavi), Belagavi-590008, India
Vijayendra R. Gurjar
Department of Chemistry, K.L.S. Gogte Institute of Technology, Belagavi-590008, India ; Centre for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, K.L.S. Gogte Institute of Technology (Affiliated to Visvesvaraya Technological University "Jnana Sangama" Belagavi), Belagavi-590008, India
Raviraj M. Kulkarni
Department of Chemistry, K.L.S. Gogte Institute of Technology, Belagavi-590008, India ; Centre for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, K.L.S. Gogte Institute of Technology (Affiliated to Visvesvaraya Technological University "Jnana Sangama" Belagavi), Belagavi-590008, India

Corresponding Author(s) : Prasanna S. Koujalagi

pskoujalagi@git.edu

Asian Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 35 No. 2 (2023): Vol 35 Issue 2, 2023

Abstract

A hybrid adsorbent (FO-Tulsion) was prepared by altering Tulsion A-62(MP), a commercial strongly basic anion-exchanging resin, with hydrated ferric oxide (HFO) particles of average crystallite size 49.6 nm and the removal of Cr6+ from water on Tulsion A-62(MP) and HFO-Tulsion was observed under optimized parameters. This study examines the effectiveness of chromium(VI) removal from water utilizing Tulsion A-62(MP) and Fe-loaded Tulsion A-62(MP) as selective sorbent materials. As the resin and HFO-ion-exchange Tulsion’s mechanism was rather easy and after 210 min of Cr6+ solution interaction, the optimum equilibrium was reached. Almost all the chromium ions was removed by the sorption process when the pH was between 4.0 and 5.0. The Freundlich and Langmuir adsorption isotherms were used to compare the equilibrium data for Cr6+ adsorption and it was found that both are highly suitable for Cr6+ adsorption. Under the same conditions, evaluation of the adsorption attainment of the prepared HFO-Tulsion and the anion resin indicated that the HFO-Tulsion had an elevated adsorption capability with a value of 207.18 mg/g than the anion resin (181.55 mg/g). The resulting hybrid resin was studied using spectroscopic and solid-state methods. Adsorption is governed by first-order reversible kinetics. It is possible that modifying anion resin with hydrated ferric oxide can greatly pick up the adsorption performance in the elimination of Cr6+ from drinking water and polluted water.

Keywords

Anion exchange resin Chromium(VI) Hybrid adsorbent Kinetics Ferric oxide HFO-Tulsion
N. Revankar, H., S. Koujalagi, P., R. Gurjar, V., & M. Kulkarni, R. (2023). Adsorption of Chromium(VI) from Aqueous Solution using Iron Oxide Loaded Strong Base Anion Exchange Resin. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 35(2), 397–405. https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2023.26935
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. A.K. Goyal, E.S. Johal and G. Rath, Curr. Nanosci., 7, 640 (2011); https://doi.org/10.2174/157341311796196772
  2. P. Meshram, A. Ghosh, Y. Ramamurthy and B.D. Pandey, Russ. J. Non- Ferrous Met., 59, 533 (2018); https://doi.org/10.3103/S1067821218050103
  3. J.A.S. Tenorio and D.C.R. Espinosa, Waste Manag., 21, 637 (2001); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0956-053X(00)00118-5
  4. Y. Xie, J. Lin, H. Lin, Y. Jiang, J. Liang, H. Wang, S. Tu and J. Li, J. Hazard. Mater., 392, 122496 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122496
  5. A. Sowmya and S. Meenakshi, Desalination Water Treat., 51, 7145 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2013.771286
  6. A. Gautam, A. Kushwaha and R. Rani, Curr. Microbiol., 79, 33 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-021-02734-z
  7. G. Sarojini, S. Venkatesh Babu, N. Rajamohan, P. Senthil Kumar and M. Rajasimman, Environ. Res., 201, 111626 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.111626
  8. S.M. Matome, E. Makhado, L.M. Katata-Seru, T.C. Maponya, K.D. Modibane, M.J. Hato and I. Bahadur, S. Afr. J. Chem. Eng., 34, 1 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajce.2020.05.004
  9. S. Rapti, A. Pournara, D. Sarma, I.T. Papadas, G.S. Armatas, A.C. Tsipis, T. Lazarides, M.G. Kanatzidis and M.J. Manos, Chem. Sci., 7, 2427 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1039/C5SC03732H
  10. N. Ballav, A. Maity and S.B. Mishra, Chem. Eng. J., 198-199, 536 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.05.110
  11. E.M. Hamilton, S.D. Young, E.H. Bailey and M.J. Watts, Food Chem., 250, 105 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.01.016
  12. W. Liu, L. Yang, S. Xu, Y. Chen, B. Liu, Z. Li and C. Jiang, RSC Adv., 8, 15087 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RA01805G
  13. R. Jayakumar, M. Rajasimman and C. Karthikeyan, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 2, 1261 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2014.05.007
  14. B. Choudhary and D. Paul, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 6, 2335 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2018.03.028
  15. H. Deveci and Y. Kar, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 19, 190 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2012.08.001
  16. F.O. Ntuli and V.E. Pakade, Chem. Eng. Commun., 207, 279 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1080/00986445.2019.1581619
  17. R.F.S. Barbosa, A.G. Souza, H.F. Maltez and D.S. Rosa, Chem. Eng. J., 395, 125055 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.125055
  18. N. Sharma, K.K. Sodhi, M. Kumar and D.K. Singh, Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag., 15, 100388 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enmm.2020.100388
  19. F. Fu, J. Ma, L. Xie, B. Tang, W. Han and S. Lin, J. Environ. Manage., 128, 822 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.06.044
  20. H. Dong, J. Deng, Y. Xie, C. Zhang, Z. Jiang, Y. Cheng, K. Hou and G. Zeng, J. Hazard. Mater., 332, 79 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.03.002
  21. S. Zhu, X. Huang, D. Wang, L. Wang and F. Ma, Chemosphere, 207, 50 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.05.046
  22. Y. Wang, D. Zhao, S. Feng, Y. Chen and R. Xie, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 580, 345 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2020.07.016
  23. W. Zhang, L. Qian, D. Ouyang, Y. Chen, L. Han and M. Chen, Chemosphere, 221, 683 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.01.070
  24. Y. Guo, X. Wei, K. Zhang, J. Zhang, L. Mi, Z. Wu, G. Wang, Y. Li, Q. Huang, W. Fu, Y. Zhang, A. Hou, H. Wang and X. Qi, J. Dispers. Sci. Technol., (2020); https://doi.org/10.1080/01932691.2020.1842761
  25. W. Jianlong, Z. Xinmin and Q. Yi, J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A Tox. Hazard. Subst. Environ. Eng., 35, 1211 (2000); https://doi.org/10.1080/10934520009377029
  26. M.R. Boldaji, R. Nabizadeh, M.H. Dehghani, K. Nadafi and A.H. Mahvi, J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A Tox. Hazard. Subst. Environ. Eng., 45, 946 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1080/10934521003772337
  27. G. Al-Enezi, M.F. Hamoda and N. Fawzi, J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A Tox. Hazard. Subst. Environ. Eng., 39, 455 (2004); https://doi.org/10.1081/ESE-120027536
  28. S. Verbych, N. Hilal, G. Sorokin and M. Leaper, Sep. Sci. Technol., 39, 2031 (2005); https://doi.org/10.1081/SS-120039317
  29. F. Gorzin and M. Bahri Rasht Abadi, Adsorpt. Sci. Technol., 36, 149 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1177/0263617416686976
  30. Y. Zhang, G. Lan, Y. Liu, T. Zhang, H. Qiu, F. Li, J. Yan and Y. Lu, Sep. Sci. Technol., 56, 2532 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1080/01496395.2020.1842451
  31. M. Nigam, S. Rajoriya, S. Rani Singh and P. Kumar, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 7, 103188 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2019.103188
  32. L. Li, Y. Li, Y. Liu, L. Ding, X. Jin, H. Lian and J. Zheng, Water, 13, 3602 (2021); https://doi.org/10.3390/w13243602
  33. A. Murugesan, T. Vidhyadevi, S.D. Kirupha, L. Ravikumar and S. Sivanesan, Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy, 32, 673 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.11684
  34. M. Ghashghaee and V. Farzaneh, Iran. J. Toxicol., 10, 15 (2016).
  35. M.A. Islam, M.J. Angove and D.W. Morton, Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag., 12, 100267 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enmm.2019.100267
  36. S. Edebali and E. Pehlivan, Chem. Eng. J., 161, 161 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2010.04.059
  37. P.S. Koujalagi, S.V. Divekar, R.M. Kulkarni and R.K. Nagarale, Desalination Water Treat., 51, 3273 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2012.749049
  38. S.S. Salih and T.K. Ghosh, Cogent Environ. Sci., 3, 1401577 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1080/23311843.2017.1401577
  39. F. Fu and Q. Wang, J. Environ. Manage., 92, 407 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.011
  40. D. Petruzzelli, R. Passino and G. Tiravanti, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 34, 2612 (1995); https://doi.org/10.1021/ie00047a009
  41. X. Li, S. Shi, H. Cao, Y. Li and D. Xu, Russ. J. Phys. Chem. A. Focus Chem., 92, 1229 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036024418060237
  42. S.S. Baral, S.N. Das, P. Rath, G. Roy Chaudhury and Y.V. Swamy, Chem. Ecol., 23, 105 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1080/02757540701197697
  43. V. Kumar and S.K. Dwivedi, J. Clean. Prod., 295, 126229 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126229
  44. B. Rzig, F. Guesmi, M. Sillanpää and B. Hamrouni, Water Sci. Technol., 84, 552 (2021); https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2021.233
  45. H.C. Yalcin and A. Kaushik, Emergent Mater., 4, 1 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1007/s42247-021-00189-3
  46. Z.A. Al-Jaser and M.F. Hamoda, Desalination Water Treat., 157, 148 (2019); https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2019.24127
  47. D. Kauspediene, E. Kazlauskiene, R. Cesuniene, A. Gefeniene, R. Ragauskas and A. Selskiene, Chemija, 24, 171 (2013).
  48. S. Ghosh, K.J. Dhole, M.K. Tripathy, R. Kumar and R.S. Sharma, J.Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 304, 917 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-014-3906-3
  49. S.M. Alshehri, M. Naushad, T. Ahamad, Z.A. Alothman and A. Aldalbahi, Chem. Eng. J., 254, 181 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.05.100
  50. K.A. Gebru and C. Das, Chemosphere, 191, 673 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.10.107
  51. D. Li, H. Song, X. Meng, T. Shen, J. Sun, W. Han and X. Wang, Nanomaterials, 10, 546 (2020); https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10030546
  52. E. Álvarez-Ayuso, Water Res., 37, 4855 (2003); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2003.08.009
  53. J. Elton, K. Hristovski and P. Westerhoff, ACS Symp. Ser., 1123, 223 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2013-1123.ch013
  54. P.S. Koujalagi, S.V. Divekar and R.M. Kulkarni, Asian J. Chem., 30, 1083 (2018); https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2018.21188
  55. M.A. Hanif, R. Nadeem, H.N. Bhatti, N.R. Ahmad and T.M. Ansari, J. Hazard. Mater., 139, 345 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.06.040
  56. S. Rengaraj, K.H. Yeon, S.Y. Kang, J.U. Lee, K.W. Kim and S.H. Moon, J. Hazard. Mater., 92, 185 (2002); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(02)00018-3
  57. S. Rengaraj and S.H. Moon, Water Res., 36, 1783 (2002); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00380-3
  58. J. Al-Abdullah, A.G. Al Lafi, T. Alnama, W. Al Masri, Y. Amin and M.N. Alkfri, Iran. J. Chem. Chem. Eng., 37, 131 (2018).
  59. Q. Yu and P. Kaewsarn, Sep. Sci. Technol., 34, 1595 (1999); https://doi.org/10.1080/01496399909353759
  60. B. Haerizade, M. Ghavami and M. Koohi, Iran. J. Chem. Chem. Eng., 37, 29 (2018).
  61. M. Kondalkar, U. Fegade, Inamuddin, S. Kanchi, T. Altalhi, K.E. Suryawanshi and A.M. Patil, J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 163, 110544 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2021.110544
  62. D. Haddad, A. Mellah, D. Nibou and S. Khemaissia, J. Environ. Eng., 144, 04018027 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001349
  63. F. Gode and E.A. Pehlivan, J. Hazard. Mater., 100, 231 (2003); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(03)00110-9
  64. T. Cheng, C. Chen, R. Tang, C. Han and Y. Tian, Iran. J. Chem. Chem. Eng., 37, 61 (2018).
  65. T. Shi, Z. Wang, Y. Liu, S. Jia and D. Changming, J. Hazard. Mater., 161, 900 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.04.041
  66. B. Singha and S.K. Das, Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces, 84, 221 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2011.01.004
  67. P.S. Koujalagi, S.V. Divekar, R.M. Kulkarni and E.M. Cuerda-Correa, Desalination Water Treat., 57, 23965 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2016.1138329
  68. D. Goyal and A. Mishra, Curr. Environ. Eng., 1, 191 (2015); https://doi.org/10.2174/221271780103150522163248
  69. E.C.M. de Moura, P.R. do Vale Souza Gois, D.R. da Silva, D.M. de Araujo and C.A. Martinez-Huitle, Curr. Anal. Chem., 13, 202 (2017); https://doi.org/10.2174/1573411012666160622081420
  70. T. Metidji, H. Bendjeffal, A. Djebli, H. Mamine, H. Bekakria and Y. Bouhedja, Recent Innov. Chem. Eng., 14, 259 (2021); https://doi.org/10.2174/2405520414666210203221527
  71. S. Parlayici, K.T. Sezer and E. Pehlivan, Curr. Anal. Chem., 16, 880 (2020); https://doi.org/10.2174/1573411015666191114143128
  72. F. Shahram Forouz, S.A. Hosseini Ravandi and A.R. Allafchian, Curr. Nanosci., 12, 266 (2016); https://doi.org/10.2174/1573413712999151216162920
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 2 Download : 1