Issue

Vol. 34 No. 12 (2022): Vol 34 Issue 12, 2022

Copyright (c) 2022 AJC

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Phosphonium Grounded Ionic Liquid Influenced in Graphene Oxide Enabled to Magnetic Polysulfone (GO/Fe3O4@PSF) for the Elimination of 2,4-Dichlorophenol

https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2022.23860
M.S. Manojkumar
Department of Biotechnology, Vivekanandha College of Engineering for Women (Autonomous), Namakkal-637205, India
B. Sivaprakash
Department of Chemical Engineering, Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar-608002, India

Corresponding Author(s) : M.S. Manojkumar

msmanojkumar1987@gmail.com

Asian Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 34 No. 12 (2022): Vol 34 Issue 12, 2022

Abstract

The phase separation technique was used to create magnetic polysulfone facilitated to graphene oxide (GO/Fe3O4@PSF) entrapped with the phosphonium-based ionic liquid which removes the phenolic content from aqueous medium. Scanning electron microscopy, Brunauer-Emmett-Teller, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and thermogravimetric analysis were used to characterize the supplement and the immobilization of trihexyltetradecylphosphonium decanoate as ionic liquid in magnetic polysulfone assisted GO was ascertained to be 83.3%. Adsorbent analysis revealed that the established granules have the ability to remove a wide range of phenolic compounds. The strongest expulsion of 2,4-dichlorophenol (2,4-DCP) has been accomplished among pH 2.0 and 11. At 25-70 ºC had no substantial influences on adsorbent, displaying the adsorbent’s suitability for use with genuine effluents. Sorption capacity evidenced that the pathway takes place in second order and the Weber-Morris template constrained the adsorbent limiter as adsorbate molecules. The Redlich-Peterson concept was indeed the great candidate for the experimental evidence, with a significance of 0.82 approaching the Langmuir isotherm model, which also acquired a qmax of 404.50 mg/g. As a method of gathering data, these supplements have the great promise to be used in the treatment of phenolic compound caused environmental contamination.

Keywords

Phosphonium ionic liquid Phosphonium ionic liquid Weber Morris model Weber Morris model Langmuir isotherm Langmuir isotherm 2,4-Dichlorophenol 2,4-Dichlorophenol
Manojkumar, M., & Sivaprakash, B. (2022). Phosphonium Grounded Ionic Liquid Influenced in Graphene Oxide Enabled to Magnetic Polysulfone (GO/Fe3O4@PSF) for the Elimination of 2,4-Dichlorophenol. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 34(12), 3108–3114. https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2022.23860
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. M. Akhtar, M.I. Bhanger, S. Iqbal and S.M. Hasany, J. Hazard. Mater., 128, 44 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.07.025
  2. P. Antonio, K. Iha and M.E.V. Suárez-Iha, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 307, 24 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2006.11.031
  3. V. Archana, K.M. Meera S. Begum and N. Anantharaman, Arab. J. Chem., 9, 371 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.03.017
  4. A. Balasubramanian, S. Venkatesan and T. Nadu, Clean, 42, 64 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.201200168
  5. J.N. Hahladakis, C.A. Velis, R. Weber, E. Iacovidou and P. Purnell, J. Hazard. Mater., 344, 179 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.10.014
  6. V. Marturano, P. Cerruti and V. Ambrogi, Phys. Sci. Rev., 2, 20160130 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1515/psr-2016-0130
  7. C. Campanale, C. Massarelli, I. Savino, V. Locaputo and V.F. Uricchio, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17, 1212 (2020); https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041212
  8. K.A.M. Said, A.F. Ismail, Z.A. Karim, M.S. Abdullah and A. Hafeez, Process Saf. Environ. Prot.., 151, 257 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2021.05.015
  9. J. Fan, Y. Fan, Y. Pei, K. Wu, J. Wang and M. Fan, Sep. Purif. Technol., 61, 324 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2007.11.005
  10. E.O. Ezugbe and S. Rathilal, Membranes, 10, 89 (2020); https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes10050089
  11. W. Choi, I. Lahiri, R. Seelaboyina and Y.S. Kang, Crit. Rev. Solid State Mater. Sci., 35, 52 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1080/10408430903505036
  12. H. Ahmad, Mi. Fana and D. Hui, Compos. B: Eng., 145, 270 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.006
  13. X. Fan, G. Jiao, W. Zhao, P. Jin and X. Li, Nanoscale, 5, 1143 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1039/C2NR33158F
  14. S. Chong, G. Zhang, H. Tian and H. Zhao, J. Environ. Sci., 44, 148 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2015.11.022
  15. N. Venkatesha, P. Poojar, Y. Qurishi, S. Geethanath and C. Srivastava, J. Appl. Phys., 117, 154702 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4918605
  16. N.D. Koromilas,C. Anastasopoulos, E.K. Oikonomou and J.K. Kallitsis, Polymers, 11, 59 (2019); https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11010059
  17. H.T.V. Nguyen, Th.H.A. Ngo, K.D. Do, M.N. Nguyen, N.T.T. Dang, T.T.H. Nguyen, V. Vien and T.A. Vu, Adv. Nanomater. Green Growth, 2019, 3164373 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3164373
  18. C. Panisello, B. Peña, T. Gumí and R. Garcia-Valls, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 129, 1625 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1002/app.38868
  19. Z. Li, M. Wu, Z. Jiao, B. Bao and S. Lu, J. Hazard. Mater., 114, 111 (2004); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.07.014
  20. C. Panisello and R. Garcia-Valls, Procedia Eng., 44, 1305 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.08.764
  21. K. Singh, S. Devi, H.C. Bajaj, P. Ingole, J. Choudhari and H. Bhrambhatt, Sep. Sci. Technol., 49, 2630 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1080/01496395.2014.911023
  22. E. Bilgin Simsek, I. Novak, O. Sausa and D. Berek, Res. Chem. Intermed., 43, 503 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1007/s11164-016-2637-1
  23. B. Xie, J. Qin, S. Wang, X. Li, H. Sun and W. Chen, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17, 789 (2020); https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030789
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0