Issue

Vol. 34 No. 9 (2022): Vol 34 Issue 9

Copyright (c) 2022 AJC

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Decolourization of Safranine Dye by Iron(II)/HClO4/CAB System from Wastewater Assisted by Response Surface Modeling

https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2022.23873
Vijaya Latha
Department of Chemistry, School of Engineering, Presidency University, Bengaluru-560064, India
Anu Sukhdev
Department of Chemistry, School of Engineering, Presidency University, Bengaluru-560064, India ; Material Research Centre, Presidency University, Bengaluru-560064, India
Pradeep Bhaskar
Material Research Centre, Presidency University, Bengaluru-560064, India
P.R. Deepthi
Material Research Centre, Presidency University, Bengaluru-560064, India
P. Mohan Kumar
Material Research Centre, Presidency University, Bengaluru-560064, India
A.S. Manjunatha
Department of Chemistry, Don Bosco Institute of Technology (Affiliated to Visvesvaraya Technological University, Belagavi), Bengaluru560074, India

Corresponding Author(s) : Anu Sukhdev

anu.sukhdev@presidencyuniversity.in; anusukhdev@yahoo.co.in

Asian Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 34 No. 9 (2022): Vol 34 Issue 9

Abstract

The response surface methodology (RSM) is applied for predictive estimation and optimization of decolourization of safranine, a phenazine dye by a chemical oxidation process using iron(II) as homogeneous catalyst and chloramine B (CAB) as an oxidant in acid medium. All experiments were based on the statistical designs in order to develop the predictive regression models and for optimization. Four independent variables (temperature, catalyst, CAB and acid concentration) were chosen to optimize the decolourization of safranine. When variance was analyzed (ANOVA), values of R2 and adjusted R2 were 0.9618 and 0.9262, respectively. The data derived from the experiments were in alignment with a second order regression model. In order to achieve a maximum decolourization, the optimal settings were found to be 0.0178 M HClO4, 0.004 M CAB, 0.0016 M iron(II) and 43.1 ºC, respectively. Under optimal reaction conditions, effect of temperature (15, 25, 35, 45 ºC) on decolourization rate was studied. Data received were in congruence with the second order kinetics. Thermodynamic parameters were also computed for the decolourization process. Maximum percentage of decolourization of safranine was predicted and experimentally validated.

Keywords

Decolourization Safranine Response surface methodology Optimization Kinetic modeling Wastewater treatment
Latha, V., Sukhdev, A., Bhaskar, P., Deepthi, P., Mohan Kumar, P., & Manjunatha, A. (2022). Decolourization of Safranine Dye by Iron(II)/HClO4/CAB System from Wastewater Assisted by Response Surface Modeling. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 34(9), 2297–2306. https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2022.23873
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. H. Mamane, S. Altshuler, E. Sterenzon and V.K. Vadivel, Acta Innovat., 37, 36 (2020); https://doi.org/10.32933/ActaInnovations.37.3
  2. S. Natarajan, H.C. Bajaj and R.J. Tayade, J. Environ. Sci., 65, 201 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2017.03.011
  3. Z. Aksu, Process Biochem., 40, 997 (2005); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2004.04.008
  4. W. Przystas, E. Zablocka-Godlewska and E. Grabinska-Sota, Braz. J. Microbiol., 46, 415 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-838246246220140167
  5. S. Sarkar, A. Banerjee, U. Halder, R. Biswas and R. Bandopadhyay, Water Conserv. Sci. Eng., 2, 121 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1007/s41101-017-0031-5
  6. C.J. Ajaelu, V. Nwosu, L. Ibironke and A. Adeleye, J. Appl. Sci. Environ. Manag., 21, 1323 (2018); https://doi.org/10.4314/jasem.v21i7.18
  7. K. Shah and A. Parmar, Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res., 13, 10105 (2018).
  8. M. Fayazi, D. Afzali, M.A. Taher, A. Mostafavi and V.K. Gupta, J. Mol. Liq., 212, 675 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2015.09.045
  9. M.K. Sahu, U.K. Sahu and R.K. Patel, RSC Adv., 5, 42294 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA03777H
  10. S. Chowdhury, R. Mishra, P. Kushwaha and P. Saha, Asia-Pac. J. Chem. Eng., 7, 236 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1002/apj.525
  11. G. Crini and E. Lichtfouse, Environ. Chem. Lett., 17, 145 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-018-0785-9
  12. A. Sukhdev, A.S. Manjunatha and Puttaswamy, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng., 70, 150 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2016.10.033
  13. S. Malini, K. Raj and N. Suresha, Indian Res. J. Pharm. Sci., 7, 2063 (2020); https://doi.org/10.21276/irjps.2020.7.1.5
  14. A.S. Manjunatha, A. Sukhdev and Puttaswamy, Color. Technol., 130, 340 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1111/cote.12104
  15. J.C. Morris, J.A. Salazar and M.A. Wineman, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 70, 2036 (1948); https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01186a016
  16. M.M. Campbell and G. Johnson, Chem. Rev., 78, 65 (1978); https://doi.org/10.1021/cr60311a005
  17. S.C. Çira, A. Dag and A. Karakus, Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2016, 2349476 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2349476
  18. A.N.Z. Alshehria, K.M. Ghanem and S.M. Al-Garni, J. Taibah Univ. Sci., 10, 797 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtusci.2015.01.004
  19. B. Sadhukhan, N.K. Mondal and S. Chattoraj, Karbala Int. J. Modern Sci., 2, 145 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kijoms.2016.03.005
  20. D.C. Montgomery, Design and Analysis of Experiments, John Wiley & Sons: New York, Edn. 4 (1997).
  21. R.H. Myers and D.C. Montgomery, Response Surface Methodology, John Wiley & Sons: New York (1995).
  22. D. Ozturk, T. Sahan, T. Bayram and A. Erkus, Fresenius Environ. Bull., 26, 3285 (2017).
  23. M. Khosravi and S. Arabi, Water Sci. Technol., 74, 343 (2016); https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2016.122
  24. F. Ghorbani and S. Kamari, Adsorpt. Sci. Technol., 35, 317 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1177/0263617416675625
  25. J. Cao, Y. Wu, Y. Jin, P. Yilihan and W. Huang, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng., 45, 860 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2013.09.011
  26. J.N. Sahu, J. Acharya and B.C. Meikap, J. Hazard. Mater., 172, 818 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.07.075
  27. S. Heydari, M.H. Zaryabi and H. Ghiassi, Anal. Bioanal. Chem. Res., 6, 271 (2019); https://doi.org/10.22036/ABCR.2018.146754.1244
  28. A. Roy, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 28, 12011 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08820-2
  29. I.F. Macias-Quiroga, E.F. Rojas-Mendez, G.I. Giraldo-Gomez and N.R. Sanabria-Gonzalez, Data Brief, 30, 105463 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2020.105463
  30. M.S. Patil, N.D. Kapsikar, P.B. Sardar, Biosci. Discov., 9, 19 (2018).
  31. K.M. Jasim and L.M. Ahmed, IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng., 571, 012064 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/571/1/012064
  32. M.R. Abukhadra and A.S. Mohamed, Silicon, 11, 1635 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-018-9980-3
  33. H.A. Mohammed, Mesopor. Environ. J., 3, 37 (2016).
  34. U. Sneha, R. Poornima and S. Sridhar, J. Chem. Pharm. Res., 5, 219 (2013).
  35. J. Zhang, L. Sun, H. Zhang, S. Wang, X. Zhang and A. Geng, PLoS One, 13, e0202440 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202440
  36. V. Sydorchuk, S. Khalameida, B. Charmas, J. Skubiszewska-Zieba, V. Zazhigalov and L. Davydenko, J. Adv. Oxid. Technol., 20, 20160176 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1515/jaots-2016-0176
  37. K. Hayat, M.A. Gondal, M.M. Khaled, Z.H. Yamani and S. Ahmed, J. Hazard. Mater., 186, 1226 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.11.133
  38. M.R. Abukhadra, M. Shaban, F. Sayed and I. Saad, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int., 25, 33264 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3270-x
  39. M.R. Abukhadra, M. Shaban and M.A. Abd El Samad, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 162, 261 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.06.081
  40. A. Ikhlaq, H.Z. Anwar, F. Javed and S. Gull, Water Sci. Technol., 79, 1367 (2019); https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2019.132
  41. J. Pinto Da Costa, A.V. Girao, O.C. Monteiro, T. Trindade and M.C. Costa, J. Environ. Health, 50, 996 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2015.1038155
  42. M.A. Mohammed, A. Ibrahim and A. Shitu, Int. J. Environ. Monit. Anal., 2, 128 (2014); https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijema.20140203.11
  43. Suhas, R. Singh, M. Chaudhary and S. Kushwaha, Int. J. Sci. Technol. Manage., 4, 166 (2015).
  44. P.K. Malik, J. Phys. Chem. A, 108, 2675 (2004); https://doi.org/10.1021/jp031082r
  45. Z. Papp, Iran. J. Chem. Chem. Eng., 37, 151 (2018); https://doi.org/10.30492/IJCCE.2018.32912
  46. B.P. Nenavathu, S. Kandula and S. Verma, RSC Adv., 8, 19659 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RA02237B
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0