Issue

Vol. 34 No. 8 (2022): Vol 34 Issue 8, 2022

Copyright (c) 2022 AJC

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Design and Synthesis of Some 1,3,4-Thiadiazole Amines: Molecular Docking, in silico ADMET, in vitro Antimicrobials and Antioxidant Studies

https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2022.23760
Sakshith Raghavendra Prasad
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, National College of Pharmacy, Balaraj Urs Road, Shivamogga-577201, India
Nayak Devappa Satyanarayan
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Kuvempu University, Post-Graduate Centre, Kadur-577548, India
Avarse Satish Kumar Shetty
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, National College of Pharmacy, Balaraj Urs Road, Shivamogga-577201, India
Harishkumar Shivanna
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Kuvempu University, Post-Graduate Centre, Kadur-577548, India
Basaiah Thippeswamy
Department of P.G. Studies and Research in Microbiology, Jnanasahyadri, Kuvempu University, Shankaraghatta-577451, India

Corresponding Author(s) : Nayak Devappa Satyanarayan

satya1782005@gmail.com

Asian Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 34 No. 8 (2022): Vol 34 Issue 8, 2022

Abstract

An increase in free radical concentration in the human body due to medications leads to oxidative stress can be counteracted by novel antioxidative agents that lower the concentration of free radical and free radical damages in human body. In present study, 2-thiophene 4-thiadiazole quinoline derivatives (5a-e) were designed and synthesized using 2-thiophene quinoline 4-carboxylic acids and thiosemicarbazide. The designed compounds 5a-e were docked against the protein PDB-ID: 1OC3 and evaluated the antioxidant activity using DPPH assay and also screened for antibacterial and antifungal potential by Agar well diffusion assay followed by in vitro antitubercular assay by MABA method. The IC50 values for compounds 5a and 5b were 415 μg/mL and 396 μg/mL. The binding affinity of docked ligands against the protein 1OC3 ranges from -6.2 to -5.7 kcal/mol. In an antimicrobial investigation, the compounds were found to be active against both bacteria and fungi, as well as sensitive to M. tuberculosis.

Keywords

Quinoline 1OC3 DPPH assay 1,3,4-Thiadiazole amines MABA
Raghavendra Prasad, S., Devappa Satyanarayan, N., Satish Kumar Shetty, A., Shivanna, H., & Thippeswamy, B. (2022). Design and Synthesis of Some 1,3,4-Thiadiazole Amines: Molecular Docking, in silico ADMET, in vitro Antimicrobials and Antioxidant Studies. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 34(8), 2067–2073. https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2022.23760
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. I. Cho and M.J. Blaser, Natl. Rev., 13, 260 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3182
  2. C.M. Kunin, N. Engl. J. Med., 360, 550 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMbkrev0807044
  3. D.L. da Silva, F.S. Reis, D.R. Muniz, A.L.T.G. Ruiz, J.E. de Carvalho, A.A. Sabino, L.V. Modolo and Â. de Fátima, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 20, 2645 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2012.02.036
  4. H. Alkadi, Infectious Disorders-Drug Targets, 20, 16 (2020); https://doi.org/10.2174/1871526518666180628124323
  5. B.L. Tan, M.E. Norhaizan, W.-P.-P. Liew and H.S. Rahman, Front. Pharmacol., 9, 1162 (2018); https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.01162
  6. P.H. Lien, H. Hua and P.H. Chuong, Int. J. Biomed. Sci., 4, 89 (2008).
  7. E. Herrera and C. Barbas, J. Physiol. Biochem., 57, 43 (2001); https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03179812
  8. E. Taflan, H. Bayrak, M. Er, S. Alpay Karaoglu and A. Bozdeveci, Bioorg. Chem., 89, 102998 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2019.102998
  9. F. Cheng, W. Li, Y. Zhou, J. Shen, Z. Wu, G. Liu, P.W. Lee and Y. Tang, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 52, 3099 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1021/ci300367a
  10. J.H. Lin and M. Yamazaki, Clin. Pharmacokinet., 42, 59 (2003); https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-200342010-00003
  11. S. Dallakyan and A.J. Olson, Methods Mol. Biol., 1263, 243 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2269-7_19
  12. P. Patil, A. Yadav, L. Bavkar, B.N. Nippu, N.D. Satyanarayan, A. Mane, A. Gurav, S. Hangirgekar and S. Sankpal, J. Mol. Struct., 1242, 130672 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2021.130672
  13. S. Harishkumar, N.D. Satyanarayan and S.M. Santhosha, Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res., 11, 306 (2018); https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2018.v11i4.24147
  14. B.A. Arthington-Skaggs, M. Motley, D.W. Warnock and C.J. Morrison, J. Clin. Microbiol., 38, 2254 (2000); https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.38.6.2254-2260.2000
  15. L. Rocha, A. Marston, O. Potterat, M.A. Kaplan, H. Stoeckli-Evans and K. Hostettmann, Phytochemistry, 40, 1447 (1995); https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9422(95)00507-4
  16. D.J. Mac Lowry, M.J. Jaqua and S.T. Selepak, Appl. Microbiol., 20, 46 (1970); https://doi.org/10.1128/am.20.1.46-53.1970
  17. A. Portillo, R. Vila, B. Freixa, T. Adzet and S. Canigueral, J. Ethnopharmacol., 76, 93 (2001); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8741(01)00214-8
  18. M.C.S. Lourenço, M.V.N. de Souza, A.C. Pinheiro, M. de L. Ferreira, R.S.B. Gonçalves, T.C.M. Nogueira and M.A. Peralta, ARKIVOC, 181 (2007); https://doi.org/10.3998/ark.5550190.0008.f18
  19. W. Brand-Williams, M.E. Cuvelier and C. Berset, Lebensm. Wiss. Technol., 28, 25 (1995); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0023-6438(95)80008-5
  20. C.A. Lipinski, Drug Discov. Today. Technol., 1, 337 (2004); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ddtec.2004.11.007
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 2 Download : 1