Issue

Vol. 26 No. 11 (2014): Vol 26 Issue 11

Copyright (c) 2014 AJC

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Elemental Compositions and Size Distributions of PM Between Urban and Rural Site in Beijing During the Spring of 2012

https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2014.15876
Yongjie Yang
National Research Center for Environmental Analysis and Measurement, Beijing 100029, P.R. China
Yue Yu
National Research Center for Environmental Analysis and Measurement, Beijing 100029, P.R. China
Rui Zhou
National Research Center for Environmental Analysis and Measurement, Beijing 100029, P.R. China
Zhiqiang Ma
Beijing Urban Meteorological Engineering Technology Research Center, Beijing 100089, P.R. China
Lijun Ren
National Research Center for Environmental Analysis and Measurement, Beijing 100029, P.R. China
Lejian Zhang
Meteorological Observation Center, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100081, P.R. China
Yi'an Di
National Research Center for Environmental Analysis and Measurement, Beijing 100029, P.R. China

Corresponding Author(s) : Yi'an Di

yyj800308@163.com

Asian Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 26 No. 11 (2014): Vol 26 Issue 11

Abstract

Particulate matter samples were collected by Thermo Scientific Andersen impactors in order to investigate the characteristic of size distributions and elemental compositions of particulate matter between urban and rural region in Beijing. The concentrations of 23 elements including Na, Mg, Al, K, Ca, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, As, Se, Sr, Mo, Cd, Ba, Tl, Pb, Th and U were detected by ICP-MS. The results showed that the total concentration of the elements at urban site detected was 38001.5 ng m-3, which was 1.4 times higher than that at rural site. The concentration of pollution elements Cr, Ni, Cu, Zn, As and Pb at urban site were 71, 34, 58, 411.1, 10.2 and 202.4 ng m-3 in the fine particles and 70.2, 38.6, 46.5, 298.3, 5.0 and 51.5 ng m-3 in the coarse particles, 1.2-2.0 times higher and 1.0-1.8 times higher than those at rural site, respectively. Then, it was found that Al, Ca, Mg, Fe, Ba, Th and Sr were mainly associated with coarse particles with a peak at 4.7-5.8 μm, Cd, As, Tl and Pb were found to be most dominant in fine particles with the peak at 0.43-1.1 μm and Na, K, Ni, V, Zn, Cr, Se, Co, Mo, Cu, Mn and U had a multi-mode distribution, with peaks at 0.43 to 1.1 μm and 4.7 to 5.8 μm. Investigation using backward air mass trajectory cluster analysis indicates that the air masses (61.1 %) reaching urban site and (59.6 %) reaching rural site originated from the south and southeast of the sites.

Keywords

Particulate matter Size distribution Enrichment factor
Yang, Y., Yu, Y., Zhou, R., Ma, Z., Ren, L., Zhang, L., & Di, Y. (2014). Elemental Compositions and Size Distributions of PM Between Urban and Rural Site in Beijing During the Spring of 2012. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 26(11), 3180–3186. https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2014.15876
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. S. Twomey, Atmos. Environ., 8, 1251 (1974); doi:10.1016/0004-6981(74)90004-3.
  2. R.J. Charlson, S.E. Schwartz, J.M. Hales, R.D. Cess, J.A. Coakley, J.E. Hansen and D.J. Hofmann, Science, 255, 423 (1992); doi:10.1126/science.255.5043.423.
  3. N. Bellouin, O. Boucher, J. Haywood and M.S. Reddy, Nature, 438, 1138 (2005); doi:10.1038/nature04348.
  4. J.M. Haywood and O. Boucher, Rev. Geophys., 38, 513 (2000); doi:10.1029/1999RG000078.
  5. P.R. Buseck, D.J. Jacob, M. Posfai, J. Li and J.R. Anderson, Int. Geol. Rev., 42, 577 (2000); doi:10.1080/00206810009465101.
  6. IPCC, Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 996 (2007).
  7. W.L. Chameides, H. Yu, S.C. Liu, M. Bergin, X. Zhou, L. Mearns, G. Wang, C.S. Kiang, R.D. Saylor, C. Luo, Y. Huang, A. Steiner and F. Giorgi, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 96, 13626 (1999); doi:10.1073/pnas.96.24.13626.
  8. D.W. Dockery, C.A. Pope, X. Xu, J.D. Spengler, J.H. Ware, M.E. Fay, B.G. Ferris Jr. and F.E. Speizer, N. Engl. J. Med., 329, 1753 (1993); doi:10.1056/NEJM199312093292401.
  9. J. Schwartz, D.W. Dockery and L.M. Neas, J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc., 46, 927 (1996); doi:10.1080/10473289.1996.10467528.
  10. J.-T. Lee, H. Kim, Y.-C. Hong, H.-J. Kwon, J. Schwartz and D.C. Christiani, Environ. Res. Sec. A, 84, 247 (2000); doi:10.1006/enrs.2000.4096.
  11. A.J. Ghio, J. Stonehuerner, L.A. Dailey and J.D. Carter, Inhal. Toxicol., 11, 37 (1999); doi:10.1080/089583799197258.
  12. G. Muránszky, M. Óvári, I. Virág, P. Csiba, R. Dobai and G. Záray, Microchem. J., 98, 1 (2011); doi:10.1016/j.microc.2010.10.002.
  13. J.D. Carter, A.J. Ghio, J.M. Samet and R.B. Devlin, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 146, 180 (1997); doi:10.1006/taap.1997.8254.
  14. I. Mori, M. Nishikawa, T. Tanimura and H. Quan, Atmos. Environ., 37, 4253 (2003); doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(03)00535-1.
  15. Y. Sun, G. Zhuang, Y. Wang, L. Han, J. Guo, M. Dan, W. Zhang, Z. Wang and Z. Hao, Atmos. Environ., 38, 5991 (2004); doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.07.009.
  16. Y. Wang, G. Zhuang, A. Tang, H. Yuan, Y. Sun, S. Chen and A. Zheng, Atmos. Environ., 39, 3771 (2005); doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.03.013.
  17. K. He, F. Yang, Y. Ma, Q. Zhang, X. Yao, C. Chan, S. Cadle, T. Chan and P. Mulawa, Atmos. Environ., 35, 4959 (2001); doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00301-6.
  18. L.T. Wang, J. Yang, P. Zhang, X.J. Zhao, Z. Wei, F.F. Zhang, J. Su and C.C Meng, Open J. Air Pollut., 2, 47 (2013); doi:10.4236/ojap.2013.23007.
  19. X. Zhao, X. Zhang, X. Xu, J. Xu, W. Meng and W. Pu, Atmos. Environ., 43, 2893 (2009); doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.03.009.
  20. Y. Yang, Y. Wang, W. Huang, B. Hu, T. Wen and Y. Zhao, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 27, 663 (2010); doi:10.1007/s00376-009-8197-1.
  21. J. Duan, J. Tan, S. Wang, J. Hao and F. Chai, J. Environ. Sci. (China), 24, 87 (2012); doi:10.1016/S1001-0742(11)60731-6.
  22. Y.J. Yang, J.Q. Liu, Y. Di, Y. Yu, R. Zhou, W. Xu, X.H. Bu and Z.Q. Ma, Y.W. Li and L.J. Ren, Environ. Chem., 32, 968 (2013) (in Chinese).
  23. A. Karanasiou, I. Sitaras, P. Siskos and K. Eleftheriadis, Atmos. Environ., 41, 2368 (2007); doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.11.006.
  24. E. Manoli, D. Voutsa and C. Samara, Atmos. Environ., 36, 949 (2002); doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00486-1.
  25. R.A. Duce, G.L. Hoffman and W.H. Zoller, Science, 187, 59 (1975); doi:10.1126/science.187.4171.59.
  26. W.H. Zoller, E.S. Gladney and R.A. Duce, Science, 183, 198 (1974); doi:10.1126/science.183.4121.198.
  27. S.R. Taylor and S.M. McLennan, Rev. Geophys., 33, 241 (1995); doi:10.1029/95RG00262.
  28. J.Y. Zhao, X.Y. Tang and W.H. Huang, Coal Geol. China, 14, 5 (2002).
  29. D. Voutsa and C. Samara, Atmos. Environ., 36, 3583 (2002); doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00282-0.
  30. Y. Sun, G. Zhuang, W. Zhang, Y. Wang and Y. Zhuang, Atmos. Environ., 40, 2973 (2006); doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.12.032.
  31. J.O. Nriagu and J.M. Pacyna, Nature, 333, 134 (1988); doi:10.1038/333134a0.
  32. J.M. Pacyna, Atmos. Environ., 18, 41 (1984); doi:10.1016/0004-6981(84)90227-0.
  33. W. Chueinta, P.K. Hopke and P. Paatero, Atmos. Environ., 34, 3319 (2000); doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00433-1.
  34. R.R. Draxler and G.D. Rolph, HYSPLIT (Hybrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory) Model access via NOAA ARL READY Website (http://ready.arl.noaa.gov/HYSPLIT.php), NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, Silver Spring, MD (2013).
  35. G.D. Rolph, Real-time Environmental Applications and Display system (READY) Website (http://ready.arl.noaa.gov), NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, Silver Spring, MD (2013).
  36. G. Tang, X. Li, Y. Wang, J. Xin and X. Ren, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 8813 (2009); doi:10.5194/acp-9-8813-2009.
  37. D. Ji, Y. Wang, L. Wang, L. Chen, B. Hu, G. Tang, J. Xin, T. Song, T. Wen, Y. Sun, Y. Pan and Z. Liu, Atmos. Environ., 50, 338 (2012); doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.11.053.
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0