Issue

Vol. 34 No. 3 (2022): Vol 34 Issue 3, 2022

Copyright (c) 2022 AJC

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Quality of Microporous Activated Charcoal from Coconut Shell Waste in Industrial Scale

https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2022.23454
S. Darmawan
Forest Product Research and Development Center, Ministry of Environment and Forestry, Jl Gunung Batu No. 5, Bogor, Indonesia
L. Efiyanti
Forest Product Research and Development Center, Ministry of Environment and Forestry, Jl Gunung Batu No. 5, Bogor, Indonesia
N.A. Saputra
Forest Product Research and Development Center, Ministry of Environment and Forestry, Jl Gunung Batu No. 5, Bogor, Indonesia
H.S. Wibisono
Forest Product Research and Development Center, Ministry of Environment and Forestry, Jl Gunung Batu No. 5, Bogor, Indonesia
G. Pari
Forest Product Research and Development Center, Ministry of Environment and Forestry, Jl Gunung Batu No. 5, Bogor, Indonesia
D. Hendra
Forest Product Research and Development Center, Ministry of Environment and Forestry, Jl Gunung Batu No. 5, Bogor, Indonesia
J. Adam
Nui Hia Prima Company, Jl Ongkoba, Sula, North Maluku 97795, Indonesia
Mufti
Nui Hia Prima Company, Jl Ongkoba, Sula, North Maluku 97795, Indonesia

Corresponding Author(s) : S. Darmawan

lisnaefiyanti@gmail.com

Asian Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 34 No. 3 (2022): Vol 34 Issue 3, 2022

Abstract

Due to its diverse applications in the adsorption process, the activated charcoal encourages the manufacturing technology to produce high-quality products. In present study, an industrial-scale activated charcoal was prepared in activated charcoal manufacturing companies using coconut shells waste as raw material. The process of making activated charcoal begins with preparation, carbonization and activation of charcoal into activated charcoal using the addition of steam as an activator. The resulting activated charcoal products meet the quality requirements of the Indonesian National Standard (SNI). The best-activated charcoal product from PT Nui Hia Prima produces iodine adsorption reaching 876.2 mg/g with the surface area of 504.306 m2/g and a total pore volume of 0.298 cm3/g. After some treatment with steam addition, the best product resulting in iodine and methylene blue adsorption are 973.9 mg/g and 121.25 mg/g, respectively. The development of the activated charcoal products expected to adjust with a technology that is more capable of producing better quality activated charcoal.

Keywords

Activated charcoal Activated charcoal Industry Industry Coconut shell Coconut shell
Darmawan, S., Efiyanti, L., Saputra, N., Wibisono, H., Pari, G., Hendra, D., … Mufti, . (2022). Quality of Microporous Activated Charcoal from Coconut Shell Waste in Industrial Scale. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 34(3), 543–549. https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2022.23454
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. X. Lu, J. Jiang, K. Sun, J. Wang and Y. Zhang, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 78, 69 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.11.007
  2. M.A. Ahmad, N.A. Ahmad Puad and O.S. Bello, Water Resour. Ind., 6, 18 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wri.2014.06.002
  3. E. Carrari, E. Ampoorter, F. Bussotti, A.G. Nogales, M. Pollastrini, A. Coppi, K. Verheyen and F. Selvi, For. Ecol. Manage., 427, 37 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.05.038
  4. X. Guo, C. Zhu and F. Guo, BioResources, 11, 2457 (2016).
  5. J. Xu, H. Liu, R. Yang, G. Li and C. Hu, Chin. J. Catal., 33, 1622 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-2067(11)60444-0
  6. P.W. Baker, A. Winters and M.D.C. Hale, Bioresource, 11, 4379 (2016); https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.11.2.4379-4391
  7. X. Peng, S. Shen, C. Wang, T. Li, Y. Li, S. Yuan and X. Wen, J. Mol. Catal., 442, 133 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcat.2017.09.012
  8. N. Suriyachai, V. Champreda, C. Sakdaronnarong, A. Shotipruk and N. Laosiripojana, Renew. Energy, 113, 1141 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.06.003
  9. F. Shen, T. Guo, C. Bai, M. Qiu and X. Qi, Fuel Process. Technol., 169, 244 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2017.10.015
  10. E. Elaiyappillai, R. Srinivasan, Y. Johnbosco, P. Devakumar, K. Murugesan, K. Kesavan and P.M. Johnson, Appl. Surf. Sci., 486, 527 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.05.004
  11. N.T. Abdel-Ghani, G.A. El-Chaghaby, E.S.A. Rawash and E.C. Lima, J. Adv. Res., 17, 55 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2018.12.004
  12. M.D. Tudjuka, K.D. Walanda and B. Hamzah, J. Akad. Kim., 6, 119 (2017); https://doi.org/10.22487/j24775185.2017.v6.i2.9243
  13. E.A. Khan, Shahjahan and T.A. Khan, J. Mol. Liq., 249, 1195 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2017.11.125.
  14. G.S. Pambayun, R.Y.E. Yulianto, M. Rachimoellah and E.M.M. Putri, J. Tek. Pomits, 2, 116 (2013).
  15. W. Widiyastuti, M. Fahrudin Rois, N.M.I.P. Suari and H. Setyawan, Adv. Powder Technol., 31, 3267 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2020.06.012
  16. T. Sruthi, J. Ashok, S.M. Nissy, C.K. Rao and M. Vangalapati, Mater. Today Proc., 18, 5240 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.07.524
  17. L.T.N. Huynh, T.N. Pham, T.H. Nguyen, V.H. Le, T.T. Nguyen, T.D.K. Nguyen, T.N. Tran, P.A.V. Ho, T.T. Co, T.T.T. Nguyen, T.K.A. Vo, T.H. Nguyen, T.T. Vu, V.M. Luong, H. Uyama, G.V. Pham, T. Hoang and D.L. Tran, Synth. Met., 265, 116415 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.synthmet.2020.116415
  18. D. DasSharma, S. Samanta, D.N.K. S and G. Halder, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 8, 104140 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104140
  19. Z. Hao, C. Wang, Z. Yan, H. Jiang and H. Xu, Chemosphere, 211, 962 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.08.038
  20. R. Khosravi, A. Azizi, R. Ghaedrahmati, V.K. Gupta and S. Agarwal, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 54, 464 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2017.06.036
  21. A.K. Prajapati and M.K. Mondal, J. Mol. Liq., 307, 112949 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2020.112949
  22. J. Xiong, S. Yu, H. Zhu, S. Wang, Y. Chen and S. Liu, BioResources, 11, 3813 (2016); https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.11.2.3813-3824
  23. Y. Zhu and P. Kolar, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng., 68, 138 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2016.07.044
  24. M.S. Gamal, N. Asikin-Mijan, M. Arumugam, U. Rashid and Y. Taufiq-Yap, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 144, 104690 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2019.104690
  25. X. Xing, T. Li, Z. Bi, P. Qi, Z. Li, H. Wang, L. Lyu, Y. Gao and C. Hu, J. Hazard. Mater., 392, 122077 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122077
  26. H. Adamu, A. Sabo, A.A. Chinade and A.F. Lame, Int. J. Renew. Energy Res., 8, 1508 (2018).
  27. Q. Liang, Y. Liu, M. Chen, L. Ma, B. Yang, L. Li and Q. Liu, Mater. Chem. Phys., 241, 122327 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.122327
  28. S. Jamilatun and S. Martomo, Spectrum Ind., 12, 73 (2014).
  29. L.S. Queiroz, L.K.C. de Souza, K.T.C. Thomaz, E.T.L. Lima, G.N. da Rocha Filho, L.A.S. do Nascimento, L.H. de Oliveira Pires, K. do Carmo Freitas Faial and C.E.F. da Costa, J. Environ. Manag., 270, 110868 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110868
  30. K. Promdee, J. Chanvidhwatanakit, S. Satitkune, C. Boonmee, T. Kawichai, S. Jarernprasert and T. Vitidsant, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 75, 1175 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.099
  31. J.V. Freitas, F.G.E. Nogueira and C.S. Farinas, Ind. Crops Prod., 137, 16 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.05.018
  32. C.W. Purnomo, E.P. Kesuma, I. Perdana and M. Aziz, Waste Manag., 79, 454 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.08.017
  33. C. Jiang, G.A. Yakaboylu, T. Yumak, J.W. Zondlo, E.M. Sabolsky and J. Wang, Renew. Energy, 155, 38 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.03.111
  34. R. Fang, H. Huang, J. Ji, M. He, Q. Feng, Y. Zhan and D.Y.C. Leung, Chem. Eng. J., 334, 2050 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.11.176
  35. K. Sun, C. Leng, J. Jiang, Q. Bu, G. Lin, X. Lu and G. Zhu, N. Carbon Mater., 32, 451 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-5805(17)60134-3
  36. A.R. Hidayu and N. Muda, Procedia Eng., 148, 106 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.463
  37. A. Kumar and H.M. Jena, Results Phys., 6, 651 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2016.09.012
  38. Z. Zhang, Y. Lei, D. Li, J. Zhao, Y. Wang, G. Zhou, C. Yan and Q. He, Renew. Energy, 153, 1091 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.02.059
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 1 Download : 0