Issue

Vol. 30 No. 10 (2018): Vol 30 Issue 10, 2018

Copyright (c) 2018 AJC

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Biodegradability Nature of Polybenzimidazole Analogs by Modulating Two Histidine Degradation Enzymes (Urocanase and Formiminoglutamase): in silico Approach

https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2018.21375
Vijayakumar Veeraragavan
Organic Chemistry Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R & D Institute of Science and Technology, Avadi, Chennai-600 062, India
Rameshkumar Chidambaram
Organic Chemistry Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R & D Institute of Science and Technology, Avadi, Chennai-600 062, India
Radhakrishnan Narayanaswamy
Bio Incubator, Vel Tech Technology Incubator (Vel Tech TBI) Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R & D Institute of Science and Technology, Avadi, Chennai-600 062, India; Department of Biotechnology, Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R & D Institute of Science and Technology, Avadi, Chennai-600 062, India

Corresponding Author(s) : Rameshkumar Chidambaram

nscrameshkumar@gmail.com

Asian Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 30 No. 10 (2018): Vol 30 Issue 10, 2018

Abstract

Biodegradation pathway of substituted imidazole compounds has been reported to have close analogue to histidine degradation pathway. The present study carried out on four different types of polybenzimidazole (PBI) analogs such as m-PBI (where n = 1, 2 and 3), p-PBI (where n = 1, 2 and 3), pyridine-m-PBI (where n = 1, 2 and 3) and alkylated-m-PBI (where n = 1, 2 and 3). These polybenzimidazole analogs were evaluated on the docking behaviour of urocanase and formiminoglutamase (FIGase) using PatchDock. Besides, molecular physico-chemical, drug-likeness, ADME (absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion analyses) were studied. ADME analysis showed that m-PBI (where n = 1) and pyridine-m-PBI (where n = 1) predicated to have cytochrome P450 (CYP1A2, CYP2C19, CYP2D6 and CYP3A4) inhibition effect. Docking studies revealed that alkylated-m-PBI (where n = 2) showed the least atomic contact energy (-123.83 kcal/mol) with that of urocanase. Similarly, m-PBI (where n = 1) showed the least ACE (-123.83 kcal/mol) with that of formiminoglutamase.

Keywords

Polybenzimidazole polymer Molecular docking Urocanase Formiminoglutamase
Veeraragavan, V., Chidambaram, R., & Narayanaswamy, R. (2018). Biodegradability Nature of Polybenzimidazole Analogs by Modulating Two Histidine Degradation Enzymes (Urocanase and Formiminoglutamase): in silico Approach. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 30(10), 2205–2209. https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2018.21375
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. M. Shimao, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 12, 242 (2001); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-1669(00)00206-8.
  2. E.W. Choe and D.D. Choe, ed.: J.C. Salamone, Polymeric Materials Encyclopedia, CRC Press, New York, pp. 5619-5638 (1996).
  3. H. Lee, D. Stoffey and K. Neville, New Linear Polymers, McGraw-Hill, New-York, Chap. 9 (1967).
  4. A.H. Frazerr, High Temperature Resistant Polymers, Interscience, New York, vol. 138 (1968).
  5. D.J. Jones and J. Roziere, J. Membr. Sci., 185, 41 (2001); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(00)00633-5.
  6. D. Mecerreyes, H. Grande, O. Miguel, E. Ochoteco, R. Marcilla and I. Cantero, Chem. Mater., 16, 604 (2004); https://doi.org/10.1021/cm034398k.
  7. Q. Li, R. He, J.O. Jensen and N.J. Bjerrum, Fuel Cells, 4, 147 (2004); https://doi.org/10.1002/fuce.200400020.
  8. K.Y. Wang, T.-S. Chung and R. Rajagopalan, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 46, 1572 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1021/ie061435j.
  9. K.Y. Wang, T.-S. Chung and J.-J. Qin, J. Membr. Sci., 300, 6 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2007.05.035.
  10. Y. Wang, M. Gruender and T.-S. Chung, J. Membr. Sci., 363, 149 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.07.024.
  11. M. Chanda, K.F. O’Driscoll and G.L. Rempel, React. Polym. Ion Exchang. Sorb., 5, 157 (1987); https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6989(87)90190-5.
  12. M. Chanda, K.F. O’Driscoll and G.L. Rempel, React. Polym. Ion Exchang. Sorb., 7, 277 (1987); https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6989(88)90253-X.
  13. M. Chanda and G.L. Rempel, React. Polym., 11, 165 (1989); https://doi.org/10.1016/0923-1137(89)90099-7.
  14. D.-Y. Xing, S.-Y. Chan and T.-S. Chung, Green Chem., 14, 1405 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1039/c2gc35134j.
  15. K.V. Peineman and S.P. Nunes, Membranes for Energy Conversion, Wiley-VCH (2008).
  16. V. Vijayakumar, C.R. Kumar, A. Suresh, S. Jayalakshmi, U.K. Mudali, N. Sivaraman, Roy. Soc. Open Sci., 5, 171701 (2018); http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.171701.
  17. R. Vijayakumar, S.S. Abd Gani and N.F. Mohd Mokhtar, Asian. J. Pharm. Clin. Res., 10, 251 (2017); https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2017.v10i8.19048.
  18. V. Vijayakumar, N. Radhakrishnan and C.R. Kumar, In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Smart Technologies and Management for Computing, Communication, Controls, Energy and Materials (ICSTM), pp. 513-516 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSTM.2017.8089213.
  19. R. Narayanaswamy, L. Kok Wai and I.S. Ismail, Int. J. Food Prop., 18, 2155 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2014.963870.
  20. E. Rorije, F. Germa, B. Philipp, B. Schink and D.B. Beimborn, SAR QSAR Environ. Res., 13, 199 (2002); https://doi.org/10.1080/10629360290002271.
  21. C.A. Lipinski, F. Lombardo, B.W. Dominy and P.J. Feeney, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 46, 3 (2001); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-409X(00)00129-0.
  22. S. Singh, A.K. Gupta and A. Verma, Res. J. Pharm. Biol. Chem. Sci., 4, 876 (2013).
  23. J. Wang and L. Urban, Drug Discovery World, 5, 73 (2004).
  24. D. Kessler, J. Retey and G.E. Schulz, J. Mol. Biol., 342, 183 (2004); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2004.07.028.
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 3 Download : 1