Issue

Vol. 30 No. 6 (2018): Vol 30 Issue 6

Copyright (c) 2018 AJC

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Synthesis and Catalytic Activity of Magnesium Hydroxide Fluorides for Production of Biodiesel: Influence of Different Mg/F Ratios

https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2018.21035
S. Indrayanah
Departemen Kimia, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember Kampus ITS Sukolilo-Surabaya 60111, Indonesia
R. Ediati
Departemen Kimia, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember Kampus ITS Sukolilo-Surabaya 60111, Indonesia
D. Hartanto
Departemen Kimia, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember Kampus ITS Sukolilo-Surabaya 60111, Indonesia
I.N. Marsih
Jurusan Kimia, Institut Teknologi Bandung Kampus ITB JL. Ganesha 10-Bandung 40132, Indonesia
I.K. Murwani
Departemen Kimia, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember Kampus ITS Sukolilo-Surabaya 60111, Indonesia

Corresponding Author(s) : I.K. Murwani

irmina@chem.its.ac.id

Asian Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 30 No. 6 (2018): Vol 30 Issue 6

Abstract

The magnesium hydroxide fluorides having formula MgFx(OH)2-x with diverse Mg/F ratios were prepared by fluorolytic sol-gel method. The XRD, FT-IR, SEM, nitrogen adsorption-desorption, TG/DTG and pyridine FT-IR were performed to study properties and characteristics of samples. Based on the characterization results, the samples show dissimilar structure, thermal stability, porosity, surface acidity and morphology. In addition, the average pore diameter and total pore volume of the MgFx(OH)2-x decrease with increase in fluorine contents. The activity of solids as heterogeneous catalyst for production of biodiesel from used frying oil exhibits that MgFx(OH)2-x with Mg/F ratio of 1:2 gives higher yield of biodiesel (75.29 %) compared to MgFx(OH)2-x (x < 2). The higher activity of MgFx(OH)2-x (x = 2) catalyst for biodiesel production can be attributed to acid sites (Lewis and Brønsted), average pore diameter and total pore volume. Moreover, performance of catalyst decreases after three cycles.

Keywords

Magnesium hydroxide fluorides Sol gel method Heterogeneous catalyst Biodiesel Used frying oil
Indrayanah, S., Ediati, R., Hartanto, D., Marsih, I., & Murwani, I. (2018). Synthesis and Catalytic Activity of Magnesium Hydroxide Fluorides for Production of Biodiesel: Influence of Different Mg/F Ratios. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 30(6), 1190–1194. https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2018.21035
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. A.T. Kiakalaieh, N.A.S. Amin and H. Mazaheri, Appl. Energy, 104, 683 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.11.061.
  2. M. Tariq, S. Ali and N. Khalid, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 16, 6303 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.07.005.
  3. A.K. Endalew, Y. Kiros and R. Zanzi, Biomass Bioenergy Rev., 35, 3787 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.06.011.
  4. A.P.S. Chouhan and A.K. Sarma, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 15, 4378 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.112.
  5. K. Ramachandran, T. Suganya, N.N. Gandhi and S. Renganathan, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 22, 410 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.01.057.
  6. D.Y.C. Leung, X. Wu and M.K.H. Leung, Appl. Energ. Rev., 87, 1083 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.10.006.
  7. M.K. Lam, K.L. Lee and A.R. Mohamed, Biotechnol. Adv. Rev., 28, 500 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.03.002.
  8. M.R. Shahbazi, B. Khoshandam, M. Nasiri and M. Ghazvini, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng., 43, 504 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2012.01.009.
  9. V.G. Deshmane and Y.G. Adewuyi, Appl. Catal. A, 462-463, 196 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2013.05.005.
  10. L. Chen, P. Yin, X. Liu, L. Yang, Z. Yu, X. Guo and X. Xin, Energy, 36, 175 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.10.056.
  11. C. Domingues, M.J.N. Correia, R. Carvalho, C. Henriques, J. Bordado and A.P.S. Dias, J. Biotechnol., 164, 433 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2012.07.009.
  12. Y. Ma, Q. Wang, Z. Gao, X. Sun, N. Wang, R. Niu and H. Ma, Renew. Energy, 86, 643 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.08.079.
  13. G. Shi, F. Yu, Y. Wang, D. Pan, H. Wang and R. Li, Renew. Energy, 92, 22 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.01.094.
  14. Y.M. Sani, P.A. Alaba, A.O. Raji-Yahya, A.R. Abdul Aziz and W.M.A. Wan Dauda, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng., 59, 195 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2015.07.016.
  15. Y.Z. Han, L. Hong, X.Q. Wang, J.Z. Liu, J. Jiao, M. Luo and Y.J. Fu, Ind. Crops Prod., 89, 332 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.05.015.
  16. S.S. Vieira, Z.M. Magriotis, M.F. Ribeiro, I. Graca, A. Fernandes, J.M.F.M. Lopes, S.M. Coelho, N.A.V. Santos and A.A. Saczk, Micropor. Mesopor. Mater., 201, 160 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2014.09.015.
  17. S. Indrayanah, A. Rosyidah, H. Setyawati and I.K. Murwani, Rasayan J. Chem., 11, 312 (2018); https://doi.org/10.7324/RJC.2018.1111904.
  18. D.A. Torres-Rodríguez, I.C. Romero-Ibarra, I.A. Ibarra and H. Pfeiffer, Renew. Energy, 93, 323 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.02.061.
  19. S. Indrayanah, I.N. Marsih and I.K Murwani, J. Korean Chem. Soc., 62, 7 (2018); https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2018.62.1.7.
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0