Issue

Vol. 30 No. 6 (2018): Vol 30 Issue 6

Copyright (c) 2018 AJC

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Triton X-100/β-Cyclodextrin Cloud Point Extraction for Removal of Phenol Using Different of Sodium Salts as Inducing Phase Separation Agent

https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2018.21228
Saliza Asman
Department of Physics and Chemistry, Faculty of Applied Sciences and Technology, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Pagoh Campus, 84600 Pagoh, Muar, Johor, Malaysia
Nur Azlie Abas
Department of Physics and Chemistry, Faculty of Applied Sciences and Technology, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Pagoh Campus, 84600 Pagoh, Muar, Johor, Malaysia

Corresponding Author(s) : Saliza Asman

salizaa@uthm.edu.my

Asian Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 30 No. 6 (2018): Vol 30 Issue 6

Abstract

A simple and low-cost cloud point extraction (CPE) method was developed for the removal of phenol in water samples prior to its spectrophotometric detection. Two CPE methods i.e., CPE-(TX/βCD)-NaOH and CPE-(TX/βCD)-Na2CO3 were developed based on Triton X-100/β-cyclodextrin (TX-100/β-CD) using electrolytes of sodium hydroxide and sodium carbonate, respectively as inducing phase separation agents.The effects of parameters; electrolytes, surfactant, β-cyclodextrin and analyte concentrations, temperature, incubation time and pH were evaluated in the context of extracting phenol from an aqueous media. Under optimized conditions, the CPE-(TX-βCD)-NaOH was selected to extract phenol from real water samples due to its superior performance vis-a-vis CPE-(TX-βCD)-Na2CO3. The calibration curve was linear in the range of 1.0 to 3.0 mg L-1 of phenol, with a regression coefficient of 0.9855. The extraction efficiency in spiked and without spiked phenol in real water samples was in the range of 91.9-116.1 %. The results confirmed that the developed method can be applied satisfactorily to detect the presence of phenol in real water samples.

Keywords

Cloud point extraction Triton X-100 β-Cyclodextrin Sodium salts Phenol
Asman, S., & Abas, N. A. (2018). Triton X-100/β-Cyclodextrin Cloud Point Extraction for Removal of Phenol Using Different of Sodium Salts as Inducing Phase Separation Agent. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 30(6), 1299–1305. https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2018.21228
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. V.C. Srivastava, M.M. Swamy, I.D. Mall, B. Prasad and I.M. Mishra, Colloids Surf. A, 272, 89 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2005.07.016.
  2. S. Kumar, D. Arya, A. Malhotra, S. Kumar and B. Kumar, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 1, 865 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2013.07.027.
  3. D.J. Swift, J. Fish Biol., 13, 7 (1978); https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1978.tb03408.x.
  4. N.N. Dutta, S. Borthakur and R. Baruah, Water Environ. Res., 70, 4 (1998); https://doi.org/10.2175/106143098X126838.
  5. M.A. Al-Obaidi, C. Kara-Zaïtri and I.M. Mujtaba, J. Water Process Eng., 18, 20 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2017.05.005.
  6. K. Chen, S. Hao, H. Lyu, G. Luo, S. Zhang and J. Chen, Sep. Purif. Technol., 172, 100 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2016.08.004.
  7. N. Othman, N.F.M. Noah, L.Y. Shu, Z.-Y. Ooi, N. Jusoh, M. Idroas and M. Goto, Chin. J. Chem. Eng., 25, 45 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2016.06.002.
  8. L.G.C. Villegas, N. Mashhadi, M. Chen, D. Mukherjee, K.E. Taylor and N. Biswas, Curr. Pollut. Reports, 2, 157 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-016-0035-3.
  9. H.B. Senturk, D. Ozdes, A. Gundogdu, C. Duran and M. Soylak, J. Hazard. Mater., 172, 353 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.07.019.
  10. M. Saraji and M. Bakhshi, J. Chromatogr. A, 1098, 30 (2005); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2005.08.063.
  11. I. Nukatsuka, S. Nakamura, K. Watanabe and K. Ohzeki, Anal. Sci., 16, 269 (2000); https://doi.org/10.2116/analsci.16.269.
  12. S.Y. Sheikheldin, T.J. Cardwell, R.W. Cattrall, M.D. Luque de Castro and S.D. Kolev, Anal. Chim. Acta, 419, 9 (2000); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(00)00991-0.
  13. M.I. Turnes, M.C. Mejuto and R. Cela, J. Chromatogr. A, 733, 395 (1996); https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9673(95)00800-4.
  14. H. Watanabe and H. Tanaka, Talanta, 25, 585 (1978); https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-9140(78)80151-9.
  15. F.H. Quina and W.L. Hinze, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 38, 4150 (1999); https://doi.org/10.1021/ie980389n.
  16. A. Favre-Réguillon, M. Draye, G. Lebuzit, S. Thomas, J. Foos, G. Cote and A. Guy, Talanta, 63, 803 (2004); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2003.12.033.
  17. C.C. Nascentes and M.A.Z. Arruda, Talanta, 61, 759 (2003); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-9140(03)00367-9.
  18. D. Sicilia, S. Rubio, D. Pérez-Bendito, N. Maniasso and E.A.G. Zagatto, Anal. Chim. Acta, 392, 29 (1999); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(99)00054-9.
  19. M.F. Nazar, S.S. Shah, J. Eastoe, A.M. Khan and A. Shah, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 363, 490 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2011.07.070.
  20. C.D. Stalikas, Trends Analyt. Chem., 21, 343 (2002); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-9936(02)00502-2.
  21. H.-N. Xu, S.-F. Ma and W. Chen, Soft Matter, 8, 3856 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1039/C2SM07371D.
  22. A.J.M. Valente and O. Söderman, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 205, 156 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2013.08.001.
  23. L. Karlson, K. Thuresson and B. Lindman, Carbohydr. Polym., 50, 219 (2002); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8617(02)00036-X.
  24. T. Tang, K. Qian, T. Shi, F. Wang, J. Li and Y. Cao, Anal. Chim. Acta, 680, 26 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2010.09.034.
  25. A. Santalad, R. Burakham, S. Srijaranai, S. Srijaranai and R.L. Deming, J. Chromatogr. Sci., 50, 523 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1093/chromsci/bms043.
  26. M.K. Purkait, S.D. Gupta and S. De, J. Hazard. Mater., 137, 827 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.03.003.
  27. N.N.M. Zain, M. Raoov, N.K. Abu Bakar and S. Mohamad, J. Inclusion Phenom. Mol. Recognit. Chem., 84, 137 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10847-015-0591-y.
  28. H. Akbas and C. Batigöc, Fluid Phase Equilib., 279, 115 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2009.02.014.
  29. L.M. Coelho and M.A.Z. Arruda, Spectrochim. Acta B: Atom. Spectrosc., 60,743 (2005); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sab.2005.02.016.
  30. E.K. Paleologos, D.L. Giokas and M.I. Karayannis, Trends Analyt. Chem., 24, 426 (2005); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2005.01.013.
  31. X. Zhu, X. Zhu, Y. Hu, S. Yu and B. Wang, Anal. Lett., 39, 1853 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1080/00032710600721522.
  32. H.-N. Xu, S.-F. Ma and W. Chen, Soft Matter, 8, 3856 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1039/c2sm07371d.
  33. D.J. Jobe, R.E. Verrall, E. Junquera and E. Aicart, J. Phys. Chem., 97, 1243 (1993); https://doi.org/10.1021/j100108a022.
  34. M. Singh, R. Sharma and U.C. Banerjee, Biotechnol. Adv., 20, 341 (2002); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-9750(02)00020-4.
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0