Issue

Vol. 33 No. 1 (2021): Vol 33 Issue 1

Copyright (c) 2021 AJC

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Development of Chitosan-Collagen/Substituted Hydroxyapatite-Polypyrrole Biocomposite with Prospective Application in Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffolds

https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2021.22943
P. Lavanya
Department of Chemistry, Government Arts College for Women, Salem-636008, India ; Department of Chemistry, Vivekanandha College for Arts and Science for Women, Veerachipalayam, Sankari-637303, India
N. Vijayakumari
Department of Chemistry, Government Arts College for Women, Salem-636008, India
R. Sangeetha
Department of Chemistry, Government Arts College for Women, Salem-636008, India ; Department of Chemistry, Shri Sakthikailassh Women′s College, Salem-636003, India
G. Priya
Department of Chemistry, Government Arts College for Women, Salem-636008, India ; Department of Chemistry, Shri Sakthikailassh Women′s College, Salem-636003, India

Corresponding Author(s) : P. Lavanya

srilavs870@gmail.com

Asian Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 33 No. 1 (2021): Vol 33 Issue 1

Abstract

An innovative hybrid based on chitosan-collagen/copper, manganese substituted hydroxyapatite-polypyrrole (CS-COL/CMHA-PPY) was developed in present study to further enhance the surface morphology of regenerative medicine scaffolds by combining the synthesized copper, manganese substituted hydroxyapatite (CMHA) and polypyrrole with the chitosan and collage solution accompanied by solvent casting techniques. The fabricated biocomposite was characterized using FTIR, XRD and SEM techniques. It investigated the effects of CMHA and polypyrrole on the scaffold's physico-chemical characteristics like swelling proportion, degradation, and mechanical nature. The CS-COL/CMHA-PPY biocomposite demonstrated lower deterioration rate and higher mechanical properties according to the chitosan-collagen and CS-COL/CMHA biocomposite. MTT assay conducted a tentative evaluation of the tissue engineering and cytotoxicity of the chitosan-biocomposite scaffold utilizing osteoblast cells. Tests demonstrated no toxicity, so osteoblast cells were bound to the biocomposite pore surfaces so propagated. Such results indicated that the scaffold established has the preconditions which can be used as a scaffold for the reconstruction of bone tissue.

Keywords

Bone Composite Polypyrrole Scaffolds Tissue engineering
Lavanya, P., Vijayakumari, N., Sangeetha, R., & Priya, G. (2020). Development of Chitosan-Collagen/Substituted Hydroxyapatite-Polypyrrole Biocomposite with Prospective Application in Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffolds. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 33(1), 76–82. https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2021.22943
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. G.S. Hussey, J.L. Dziki and S.F. Badylak, Nat. Rev. Mater., 3, 159 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-018-0023-x
  2. M. Walraven and B. Hinz, Matrix Biol., 71-72, 205 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matbio.2018.02.020
  3. W. Friess, Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm., 45, 113 (1998); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0939-6411(98)00017-4
  4. K. Kalantari, A.M. Afifi, H. Jahangirian and T.J. Webster, Carbohydr. Polym., 207, 588 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.12.011
  5. K. Aoki and N. Saito, Pharmaceutics, 12, 95 (2020);https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics12020095
  6. R. Ghosh, O. Swart, S. Westgate, B.L. Miller and M.Z. Yates, Langmuir,35, 5957 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b00919
  7. S. Kandasamy, V. Narayanan and S. Sumathi, Int. J. Biol. Macromol.,145, 1018 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.09.193
  8. T. Tite, A.C. Popa, L.M. Balescu, I.M. Bogdan, I. Pasuk, J.M. Ferreira and G.E. Stan, Materials, 11, 2081 (2018);https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11112081
  9. B. Guo, L. Glavas and A.C. Albertsson, Prog. Polym. Sci., 38, 1263 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016 j.progpolymsci.2013.06.003
  10. A. Talebi, S. Labbaf and F. Karimzadeh, Polym. Compos., 41, 645 (2020);https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.25395
  11. N. Thongtham, P. Chaiin, O. Unger, S. Boonrungsiman and O.Suwantong, Polym. Adv. Technol., 31, 1496 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.4879
  12. M.F. Abou Taleb, A. Alkahtani and S.K. Mohamed, Polym. Bull., 72,725 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-015-1301-z
  13. J. Venkatesan, R. Pallela, I. Bhatnagar and S.-K. Kim, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 51, 1033 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2012.08.020
  14. Y.S. Wei, K.S. Chen and L.T. Wu, J. Inorg. Biochem., 164, 17 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2016.08.007
  15. R. Jolly, A.A. Khan, S.S. Ahmed, S. Alam, S. Kazmi, M. Owais, M.A. Farooqi and M. Shakir, Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 109, 110554 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.110554
  16. J. Zhang, G. Liu, Q. Wu, J. Zuo, Y. Qin and J. Wang, J. Bionics Eng., 9,243 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(11)60117-0
  17. J. Mobika, M. Rajkumar, V.N. Priya and S.P. Linto Sibi, J. Mol. Struct.,1206, 127739 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2020.127739
  18. R. Sarkar, A. Agrawal and R. Ghosh, Trans. Indian Ceram. Soc., 78,101 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1080/0371750X.2019.1619484
  19. L. Sundarabharathi, D. Ponnamma, H. Parangusan, M. Chinnaswamy and M.A.A. Al-Maadeed, SN Appl. Sci., 2, 94 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-1807-3
  20. S.F. Ivanova and N.N. Petrova, Mater. Sci. Forum, 945, 422 (2019): https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.945.422
  21. K.P. Ananth, A.J. Nathanael, S.P. Jose, T.H. Oh and D. Mangalaraj, Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 59, 1110 (2016);https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.10.045
  22. M. Catauro, F. Barrino, I. Blanco, S. Piccolella and S. Pacifico, Coatings, 10, 203 (2020); https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings10030203
  23. D. Luo, L. Sang, X. Wang, S. Xu and X. Li, Mater. Lett., 65, 2395 (2011);https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2011.05.011
  24. L. Wang and C. Li, Carbohydr. Polym., 68, 740 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2006.08.010
  25. M. Lee, R. Rizzo, F. Surman and M. Zenobi-Wong, Chem. Rev., 120, 10950 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00077
  26. R. Junka and X. Yu, Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 113, 110981 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.110981
  27. A. Sionkowska, A. Tuwalska, Int. J. Polym. Anal. Charact., 25, 315 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1080/1023666X.2020.1786271
  28. V. Sencadas, S. Sadat and D.M. Silva, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater.,102, 103474 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103474
  29. P. Datta, B. Ayan and I.T. Ozbolat, Acta Biomater., 51, 1 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.01.035
  30. M. Geraghty, J.F. Cronin, M. Devereux and M. McCann, Biometals, 13, 1 (2000); https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009271221684
  31. A. Talebi, S. Labbaf and F. Karimzadeh, Polym. Test., 75, 254 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.02.029
  32. I. Denry and L.T. Kuhn, Dent. Mater., 32, 43 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.09.008
  33. Y. Wu, Y. Wang, H. Chen, S. Ge, J. Zhang, C. Mao, H. Ding and J. Shen, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol., 16, 2343 (2016);https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2016.10955
  34. J. Liao, X. Guo, D. Nelson, F. Kurtis-Kasper and A.G. Mikos, ActaBiomater., 6, 2386 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.01.011
  35. A. Fahlgren, C. Bratengeier, A. Gelmi, C.M. Semeins, J. Klein-Nulend, E.W.H. Jager and A.D. Bakker, PLoS One, 10, e0134023 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134023
  36. H. Castano, E.A. O’Rear, P.S. McFetridge and V.I. Sikavitsas, Macromol.Biosci., 4, 785 (2004);https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.200300123
  37. J.G. Hardy, M.K. Villancio-Wolter, R.C. Sukhavasi, D.J. Mouser, D.Aguilar Jr., S.A. Geissler, D.L. Kaplan and C.E. Schmidt, Macromol.Rapid Commun., 36, 1884 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.201500233
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0