Issue

Vol. 29 No. 11 (2017): Vol 29 Issue 11

Copyright (c) 2017 AJC

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Synthesis of Polyaniline Based Nanocomposite Graphite Paste Electrode Modified with and Without Rice Husk for Sensor Application: A Comparative Study

https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2017.20855
K.S. Paithankar
Department of Physics Research Center, Ahmednagar College, Ahmednagar-414 001, India
V.B. Deshmukh
Department of Physics Research Center, Ahmednagar College, Ahmednagar-414 001, India
U.N. Shelke
Department of Physics Research Center, Ahmednagar College, Ahmednagar-414 001, India
S.B. Iyyer
Department of Physics Research Center, Ahmednagar College, Ahmednagar-414 001, India
S.T. More
Department of Physics, Institute of Technology, Kuran, Pune-410 511, India
V.K. Gade
Department of Physics, Shri Anand College, Pathardi-414 102, India

Corresponding Author(s) : K.S. Paithankar

paithankar86@gmail.com

Asian Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 29 No. 11 (2017): Vol 29 Issue 11

Abstract

Polyaniline based nanocomposite graphite paste electrode modified with rice husk (PANI/Gr/RH) and without rice husk (PANI/Grph) to compare the amperometric response caused by the addition of rice husk in conventional sensor. Organized materials were characterized by analytical techniques such as UV-visible, XRD and FE-SEM analyses. The performance of the developed sensor was evaluated and the obtained urea biosensor exhibited shorter response time (3 s), wider range 1 × 10-9 to 9 × 10-9 M and the detection limit were found to be 1 × 10-9. About 90 % of the enzyme activity is retained for about 40 days. Modified rice husk sensor gives better result than sensor without rice husk.

Keywords

Amperometric Biosensor Rice husk Nanocomposite Polyaniline
Paithankar, K., Deshmukh, V., Shelke, U., Iyyer, S., More, S., & Gade, V. (2017). Synthesis of Polyaniline Based Nanocomposite Graphite Paste Electrode Modified with and Without Rice Husk for Sensor Application: A Comparative Study. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 29(11), 2545–2548. https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2017.20855
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. I. Svancara, K. Vytras, K. Kalcher, A. Walcarius and J. Wang, Electroanalysis, 21, 7 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.200804340.
  2. N.S. Gadhari, B.J. Sanghavi and A.K. Srivastava, Anal. Chim. Acta, 703, 31 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2011.07.017.
  3. B. Lakard, G. Herlem, S. Lakard, A. Antoniou and B. Fahys, Biosens. Bioelectron., 19, 1641 (2004); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2003.12.035.
  4. A. Sehitogullari and A.H. Uslan, Talanta, 57, 1039 (2002); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-9140(02)00149-2.
  5. S.B. Adeloju, S.J. Shaw and G.G. Wallace, Anal. Chim. Acta, 281, 621 (1993); https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2670(93)85023-D.
  6. A. Sassolas, B. Prieto-Simón and J.-L. Marty, Am. J. Anal. Chem., 3, 210 (2012); https://doi.org/10.4236/ajac.2012.33030.
  7. G.G. Guilbault and J.G. Montalvo, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 92, 2533 (1970); https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00711a052.
  8. E. Bakker and M.E. Meyerhoff, eds.: A.J. Bard, M. Stratmann and G.S. Wilson, Ion-Selective Electrodes for Measurements in Biological Fluids, In: Encyclopedia of Electrochemistry, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, vol. 9 (2002).
  9. S. Uchiyama, M. Kobayashi and Y. Hasebe, Electroanalysis, 14, 1644 (2002); https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.200290005.
  10. R. Sahney, B.K. Puri and S. Anand, Anal. Chim. Acta, 542, 157 (2005); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2005.03.069.
  11. P. Bertocchi, D. Compagnone and G. Palleschi, Biosens. Bioelectron., 11, 1 (1996); https://doi.org/10.1016/0956-5663(96)83708-0.
  12. M. Senda and Y. Yamamoto, Electroanalysis, 5, 775 (1993); https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.1140050910.
  13. K. Yoneyama, Y. Fujino, T. Osaka and I. Satoh, Sens. Actuators B Chem., 76, 152 (2001); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-4005(01)00613-X.
  14. W.J. Cho and H.J. Huang, Anal. Chem., 70, 3946 (1998); https://doi.org/10.1021/ac980004a.
  15. V. Rajesh, W. Bisht, W. Takashima and K. Kaneto, Biomaterials, 26, 3683 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.024.
  16. M. Trojanowicz, A. Lewenstam, T.K.V. Krawczyk, I. Lahdesmaki and W. Szczepek, Electroanalysis, 8, 233 (1996); https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.1140080307.
  17. P.C. Pandey and A.P. Mishra, Analyst, 113, 329 (1988); https://doi.org/10.1039/an9881300329.
  18. B.E.Y. Yon Hin, R.S. Sethi and C.R. Lowe, Sens. Actuators, 1, 550 (1990); https://doi.org/10.1016/0925-4005(90)80271-Z.
  19. S.B. Adeloju, S.J. Shaw and G.G. Wallace, Anal. Chim. Acta, 341, 155 (1997); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(96)00502-8.
  20. S.B. Adeloju, S.J. Shaw and G.G. Wallace, Anal. Chim. Acta, 323, 107 (1996); https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2670(95)00562-5.
  21. I. Vostiar, J. Tkac, E. Sturdik and P. Gemeiner, Bioelectrochemistry, 56, 113 (2002); https://doi.org/10.1016/S1567-5394(02)00042-7.
  22. D. Kirstein, L. Kirstein and F. Scheller, Biosensors, 1, 117 (1985); https://doi.org/10.1016/0265-928X(85)85007-0.
  23. D. Kirstein, F. Scheller, B. Olsson and G. Johansson, Anal. Chim. Acta, 171, 345 (1985); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(00)84213-0.
  24. S. Uchiyama, H. Watanabe, H. Yamazaki, A. Kanazawa, H. Hamana and Y. Okabe, J. Electrochem. Soc., 154, F31 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2402127.
  25. D.K. Bandgar, G.D. Khuspe, R.C. Pawar, C.S. Lee and V.B. Patil, Appl. Nanosci., 4, 27 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-012-0175-8.
  26. S.K. Shukla, A. Bharadvaja, A. Tiwari, G.K. Parashar and G.C. Dubey, Adv. Mater. Letts., 1, 129 (2010). https://doi.org/10.5185/amlett.2010.3105.
  27. V.K. Gade, D.J. Shirale, P.D. Gaikwad, P.A. Savale, K.P. Kakde, H.J. Kharat and M.D. Shirsat, React. Funct. Polym., 66, 1420 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2006.04.005.
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0