Issue

Vol. 29 No. 11 (2017): Vol 29 Issue 11

Copyright (c) 2017 AJC

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Characterization of Cellulose Phthalate and Ionic Conductivity of Cellulose Phthalate-LiClO4 Complexes

https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2017.20746
Aruukhan Dashkhuu Khasbaatar
Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, National University of Mongolia, P.O. Box 46A/257, zip code 14201 Main building of NUM, University Street 1, Sukhbaatar District, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
Ung Su Choi
Center for Urban Energy System Research, Green City Technology Institute, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, 5, Hwarang-ro 14-gil, Seongbuk-Gu, Seoul 02792, Republic of Korea
Bayanjargal Ochirkhuyag
Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, National University of Mongolia, P.O. Box 46A/257, zip code 14201 Main building of NUM, University Street 1, Sukhbaatar District, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

Corresponding Author(s) : Aruukhan Dashkhuu Khasbaatar

d_khasbaatar@seas.num.edu.mn

Asian Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 29 No. 11 (2017): Vol 29 Issue 11

Abstract

In this article, ion-conducting solid polymer electrolytes based on cellulose phthalate (CP) with lithium perchlorate were prepared by the solution casting method. The host polymer cellulose phthalate was successfully synthesized and characterized by Fourier transform infrared analysis, HR X-Ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, thermogravimetric analyzer. The maximum degree of substitution of phthalic groups on anhydroglucose unit of cellulose (CPm) was 2.33. Ionic conductivities of CPm-LiClO4 complexes were studied with various salt concentration and temperatures. The ionic conductivity was investigated using alternating current (AC) impedance spectroscopy. The highest ionic conductivity (2.54 × 10-5 S/cm) at room temperature was obtained for CPm-LiClO4-4 when the ratio between degree of substitution (DS) of CPm and LiClO4 is 2.33:2.0. Ionic conductivity of CPm complex was increased with the increase of temperature due to free volume theory. The trends of the ionic conductivity of CPm complexes were fitted to Arrhenius behaviour.

Keywords

Cellulose phthalate Ionic Conductivity Solid polymer electrolyte HR X-Ray Degree of substitution
Khasbaatar, A. D., Choi, U. S., & Ochirkhuyag, B. (2017). Characterization of Cellulose Phthalate and Ionic Conductivity of Cellulose Phthalate-LiClO4 Complexes. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 29(11), 2453–2458. https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2017.20746
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. Q. Zhao, J.W.C. Dunlop, X. Qiu, F. Huang, Z. Zhang, J. Heyda, J. Dzubiella, M. Antonietti and J. Yuan, Nat. Commun., 5, 4293 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5293.
  2. G. Wang, L. Zhang and J. Zhang, Chem. Soc. Rev., 41, 797 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1039/C1CS15060J.
  3. J. Migdalski, T. Blaz and A. Lewenstam, Electrochim. Acta, 133, 316 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2014.03.169.
  4. Z. Cui, E. Drioli and Y.M. Lee, Prog. Polym. Sci., 39, 164 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.07.008.
  5. A. Manuel Stephan and K.S. Nahm, Polymer, 47, 5952 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2006.05.069.
  6. S. Rajendran, R.S. Babu and P. Sivakumar, J. Power Sources, 170, 460 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.04.041.
  7. K. Kesavan, S. Rajendran and C.M. Mathew, Polym. Sci. Ser. B, 56, 520 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1134/S1560090414040034.
  8. M.I.H. Sohaimy and M.I.N. Isa, Fibers Polym., 16, 1031 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-015-1031-8.
  9. C.V. Subba Rao, M. Ravi, V. Raja, P.B. Bhargav, A.K. Sharma and V.V.R. Narasimha Rao, Iran. Polym. J., 21, 531 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1007/s13726-012-0058-6.
  10. V.L. Finkenstadt, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 67, 735 (2005); https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-005-1931-4.
  11. P.K. Khare, J.M. Keller, M.S. Gaur, R. Singh and S.C. Datt, Polym. Int., 35, 337 (1994); https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.1994.210350406.
  12. M. Chelmecki, W.H. Meyer and G. Wegner, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 105, 25 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1002/app.26108.
  13. M. Rahman and C.S. Brazel, Prog. Polym. Sci., 29, 1223 (2004); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2004.10.001.
  14. A.D. Khasbaatar, Y.J. Chun and U.S. Choi, Polym. J., 40, 302 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1295/polymj.PJ2007127.
  15. A.N. Papadopoulos, Holz Roh- Werkst., 64, 245 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-006-0110-3.
  16. C. Saikia, A. Hussain, A. Ramteke, H.K. Sharma, P. Deb and T.K. Maji, Iran. Polym. J., 24, 815 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1007/s13726-015-0370-z.
  17. K. Bilba and A. Ouensanga, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 38, 61 (1996); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-2370(96)00952-7.
  18. S.-B. Lee, Polymer Interfaces and Emulsions, Marcel Dekker, Inc, New York (1999).
  19. T. Yoshimura, K. Matsuo and R. Fujioka, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 99, 3251 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1002/app.22794.
  20. R. Jayakumar, R. Balaji and S. Nanjundan, Eur. Polym. J., 36, 1659 (2000); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-3057(99)00244-X.
  21. A.D. Khasbaatar, Y.G. Ko and U.S. Choi, React. Funct. Polym., 67, 312 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2007.01.003.
  22. L.M. Matuana, J.J. Balatinecz, R.N.S. Sodhi and C.B. Park, Wood Sci. Technol., 35, 191 (2001); https://doi.org/10.1007/s002260100097.
  23. J.R.E. Barker and C.R. Thomas, J. Appl. Phys., 35, 3203 (1964); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1713200.
  24. H.Y. Yang, G. Wu, H. Chen, F. Yuan, M. Wang and R.-J. Fu, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 101, 461 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1002/app.23291.
  25. S. Rajendran, P. Sivakumar and R.S. Babu, J. Power Sources, 164, 815 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.09.011.
  26. Y.K. Siew, G. Sarkar, X. Hu, J. Hui, A. See and C.T. Chua, J. Electrochem. Soc., 147, 335 (2000); https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1393196.
  27. M. Armand and J.-M. Tarascon, Nature, 451, 652 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1038/451652a.
  28. M.A. Ratner and D.F. Shriver, Chem. Rev., 88, 109 (1988); https://doi.org/10.1021/cr00083a006.
  29. M.M.E. Jacob, S.R.S. Prabaharan and S. Radhakrishna, Solid State Ion., 104, 267 (1997); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2738(97)00422-0
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0